• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带有钛质皮质纽扣和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线的ACL TightRope® RT对肱二头肌远端肌腱进行解剖复位的回顾性评估:初步报告

A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report.

作者信息

Witkowski Jarosław, Kentel Maciej, Królikowska Aleksandra, Reichert Paweł

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Clinic of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Wroclaw University Clinical Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.

eMKaMED Medical Centre, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Polim Med. 2016 Jul-Dec;46(2):163-169. doi: 10.17219/pim/0000.

DOI:10.17219/pim/0000
PMID:28397457
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various surgical techniques for treating distal biceps brachii tendon injury have been described, and to date there is no consensus regarding the preferred fixation method for the anatomic reinsertion of the ruptured tendon.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to clinically and functionally evaluate the upper limb after surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon using an ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) suture, and to assess postoperative complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The sample comprised 3 patients. Clinical examination (history, measurements of the active range of forearm motion, arm circumference, the maximum isometric forearm supination and flexion muscle torque), pain evaluation (on a visual analogue scale [VAS]) and functional assessment (the Mayo Elbow Performance Index [MEPI] and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) were carried out. Complications were documented.

RESULTS

The results of the range of motion measurements, arm circumferences and normalized isometric torque values of the muscle groups being studied were comparable in the involved and uninvolved limbs. The MEPI (x = 95.00 ± 10.42) and Quick DASH (x = 8.66 ± 18.04) scores revealed very good results. The VAS results were close to no pain (x = 3.33 ± 5.77 mm). No complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary comprehensive clinical and functional assessment of the upper limb justify the clinical use of the ACL TightRope® RT with a titanium cortical button and UHMWPE suture in surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. The early results with a small sample were encouraging, but studies with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up are needed.

摘要

背景

已经描述了多种治疗肱二头肌远端肌腱损伤的手术技术,迄今为止,对于断裂肌腱的解剖再植入的首选固定方法尚无共识。

目的

本研究的目的是对使用带有钛质皮质纽扣和超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)缝线的ACL TightRope® RT对肱二头肌远端肌腱进行手术解剖再植入后的上肢进行临床和功能评估,并评估术后并发症。

材料与方法

样本包括3例患者。进行了临床检查(病史、前臂活动范围测量、上臂围、最大等长前臂旋后和屈曲肌肉扭矩)、疼痛评估(视觉模拟量表[VAS])和功能评估(梅奥肘关节功能指数[MEPI]和手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表[DASH])。记录并发症情况。

结果

所研究肌肉群的活动范围测量、上臂围和标准化等长扭矩值在患侧和未患侧肢体中具有可比性。MEPI(x = 95.00 ± 10.42)和快速DASH(x = 8.66 ± 18.04)评分显示结果非常好。VAS结果接近无痛(x = 3.33 ± 5.77 mm)。未观察到并发症。

结论

对上肢进行的初步综合临床和功能评估证明,在肱二头肌远端肌腱的手术解剖再植入中,使用带有钛质皮质纽扣和UHMWPE缝线的ACL TightRope® RT具有临床应用价值。小样本的早期结果令人鼓舞,但需要更多病例和更长随访时间的研究。

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report.使用带有钛质皮质纽扣和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线的ACL TightRope® RT对肱二头肌远端肌腱进行解剖复位的回顾性评估:初步报告
Polim Med. 2016 Jul-Dec;46(2):163-169. doi: 10.17219/pim/0000.
2
A comparative clinical and functional assessment of cortical button versus suture anchor in distal biceps brachii tendon repair.肱二头肌远端肌腱修复中皮质纽扣与缝线锚钉的比较临床和功能评估
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Anatomical Repair of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture Using Suture Anchor Fixation.采用缝线锚定修复术治疗肱二头肌肌腱远端撕裂的回顾性评估。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Oct 17;23:4961-4972. doi: 10.12659/msm.903723.
4
Treatment of primary total distal biceps tendon rupture using cortical button, transosseus fixation and suture anchor: A single center experience.采用皮质纽扣、经骨固定和缝线锚定治疗原发性全远端肱二头肌腱断裂:单中心经验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Oct;104(6):859-863. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Surgical Treatment of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Analysis of Complications in 784 Surgical Repairs.肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂的手术治疗:784例手术修复的并发症分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3020-3029. doi: 10.1177/0363546517720200. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
The effect of steroid-abuse on anatomic reinsertion of ruptured distal biceps brachii tendon.类固醇滥用对肱二头肌肌腱远端撕裂的解剖再植入的影响。
Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.018. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
7
Chronic distal biceps avulsion treated with suture button.采用缝线纽扣治疗慢性远端肱二头肌撕脱伤。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Aug;29(8):1548-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.103. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
High complication rate following distal biceps refixation with cortical button.远端肱二头肌皮质扣固定后并发症发生率高。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Oct;133(10):1361-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1819-1. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
9
Intramedullary Cortical Button Repair for Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture: A Single-Center Experience.髓内皮质纽扣修复治疗肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂:单中心经验
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 May;44(5):418.e1-418.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
Distal biceps tendon repair using a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique.采用双皮质内纽扣解剖足迹修复技术修复肱二头肌远端肌腱。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2243-2251. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.028. Epub 2024 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A new minimally invasive method for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a Tightrope system.一种使用Tightrope系统对踝关节外侧韧带进行解剖重建的新型微创方法。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1549-1555. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2955-4. Epub 2018 Jun 6.