• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用缝线锚定修复术治疗肱二头肌肌腱远端撕裂的回顾性评估。

Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Anatomical Repair of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture Using Suture Anchor Fixation.

机构信息

Department and Clinic of Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Department of Physiotherapy, The College of Physiotherapy in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2017 Oct 17;23:4961-4972. doi: 10.12659/msm.903723.

DOI:10.12659/msm.903723
PMID:29040248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5656101/
Abstract

BACKGROUND To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the preferred fixation method to use in the repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture. The aim of this study was to clinically and functionally (Mayo Elbow Performance Index, MEPI) assess the upper limb after surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon with the use of suture anchor fixation method with regard to postoperative time and limb dominance, and to assess postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS The sample comprised 18 males (age 52.09±8.89 years) after surgical anatomical distal biceps brachii reinsertion using suture anchor fixation. A comprehensive clinical and functional evaluation and pain assessment were performed. RESULTS In terms of postoperative complications, an isolated case of surgical site sensory disturbances was noted. Circumferences (p-value 0.21-1.00) and ROM (p-value 0.07-1.00) were similar in the operated and nonoperated limbs. The isometric torque (IT) values of muscles flexing and supinating the forearm were comparable in both limbs (p-value 0.14-0.95), but in patients with the operated dominant limb, the mean IT value was not higher than the value obtained in the nonoperated nondominant one. The MEPI indicated good and excellent results (80.00±15.00-90.00±8.66 points), but a detailed individual analysis showed that reported scores were not in line with objectively measured features. CONCLUSIONS The results of the comprehensive retrospective evaluation justify the clinical use of suture anchors fixation method in the surgical anatomical reinsertion of a ruptured distal biceps brachii tendon. The assessment of a patient should always report both subjective and objective measures.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,对于修复肱二头肌远端肌腱撕裂,哪种固定方法更优,尚未达成共识。本研究旨在通过使用缝线锚定固定方法对肱二头肌远端肌腱进行解剖复位,从临床和功能(Mayo 肘部功能指数,MEPI)方面评估术后时间和肢体优势对上肢的影响,并评估术后并发症。

材料与方法

该样本包括 18 名男性(年龄 52.09±8.89 岁),均接受了使用缝线锚定固定方法的肱二头肌远端肌腱解剖复位手术。对所有患者进行了全面的临床和功能评估及疼痛评估。

结果

在术后并发症方面,仅出现 1 例手术部位感觉障碍的孤立病例。患侧和健侧的周径(p 值 0.21-1.00)和 ROM(p 值 0.07-1.00)相似。患侧和健侧的前臂屈肌和旋后肌等速扭矩(IT)值具有可比性(p 值 0.14-0.95),但在患侧优势上肢中,平均 IT 值并不高于非患侧非优势上肢的 IT 值。MEPI 显示出良好和优秀的结果(80.00±15.00-90.00±8.66 分),但详细的个体分析表明,报告的分数与客观测量的特征不一致。

结论

综合回顾性评估的结果证明了缝线锚定固定方法在肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂的手术解剖复位中的临床应用价值。对患者的评估应始终报告主观和客观测量结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/7b93ad6621c7/medscimonit-23-4961-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/3c96694a9a9f/medscimonit-23-4961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/2b8cd7cca3b6/medscimonit-23-4961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/b4b7c0d9bff1/medscimonit-23-4961-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/d957c20bab2c/medscimonit-23-4961-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/b76e4f55f7ce/medscimonit-23-4961-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/c9ab2c0bfc54/medscimonit-23-4961-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/9e7c6bb74272/medscimonit-23-4961-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/fa2d20597a92/medscimonit-23-4961-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/3f049f5941a8/medscimonit-23-4961-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/8cc079a2858c/medscimonit-23-4961-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/7b93ad6621c7/medscimonit-23-4961-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/3c96694a9a9f/medscimonit-23-4961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/2b8cd7cca3b6/medscimonit-23-4961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/b4b7c0d9bff1/medscimonit-23-4961-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/d957c20bab2c/medscimonit-23-4961-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/b76e4f55f7ce/medscimonit-23-4961-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/c9ab2c0bfc54/medscimonit-23-4961-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/9e7c6bb74272/medscimonit-23-4961-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/fa2d20597a92/medscimonit-23-4961-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/3f049f5941a8/medscimonit-23-4961-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/8cc079a2858c/medscimonit-23-4961-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59bb/5656101/7b93ad6621c7/medscimonit-23-4961-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Anatomical Repair of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture Using Suture Anchor Fixation.采用缝线锚定修复术治疗肱二头肌肌腱远端撕裂的回顾性评估。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Oct 17;23:4961-4972. doi: 10.12659/msm.903723.
2
A comparative clinical and functional assessment of cortical button versus suture anchor in distal biceps brachii tendon repair.肱二头肌远端肌腱修复中皮质纽扣与缝线锚钉的比较临床和功能评估
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jan;24(1):103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
A Retrospective Evaluation of Anatomical Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Using an ACL TightRope® RT with a Titanium Cortical Button and Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture: A Preliminary Report.使用带有钛质皮质纽扣和超高分子量聚乙烯缝线的ACL TightRope® RT对肱二头肌远端肌腱进行解剖复位的回顾性评估:初步报告
Polim Med. 2016 Jul-Dec;46(2):163-169. doi: 10.17219/pim/0000.
4
Treatment of primary total distal biceps tendon rupture using cortical button, transosseus fixation and suture anchor: A single center experience.采用皮质纽扣、经骨固定和缝线锚定治疗原发性全远端肱二头肌腱断裂:单中心经验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Oct;104(6):859-863. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
No functional differences in anatomic reconstruction with one vs. two suture anchors after non-simultaneous bilateral distal biceps brachii tendon rupture: a case report and review of the literature.非同期双侧肱二头肌长头肌腱断裂后,使用 1 枚 vs. 2 枚缝线锚钉行解剖重建无功能差异:病例报告及文献复习。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 27;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03304-3.
6
Good isometric and isokinetic power restoration after distal biceps tendon repair with anchors.使用锚钉修复肱二头肌远端肌腱后,等长和等速力量恢复良好。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul;137(7):939-944. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2724-9. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
7
Functional outcome in patients who underwent distal biceps tendon repair.接受肱二头肌远端肌腱修复术患者的功能预后
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1541-1548. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3018-6. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
8
Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion--clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years.肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂:保守治疗与解剖复位——2年后的临床和影像学评估
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Oct;127(8):705-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0326-7. Epub 2007 Apr 28.
9
[Evaluation of surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures].[肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂的手术修复评估]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Feb;76(1):47-53.
10
Anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon rupture through a single anterior approach: extensile or mini-invasive approach? A retrospective study at mean 45-month follow-up.通过单一前入路对肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂进行解剖复位:扩展性入路还是微创入路?一项平均随访45个月的回顾性研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2014 Apr;98 Suppl 1:71-6. doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0318-z. Epub 2014 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinsertion of Distal Brachial Biceps Tendon Rupture through Single Incision Using Anchors.使用锚钉通过单一切口重新植入肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂处
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr;55(2):191-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400525. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Endobutton versus transosseous suture repair of distal biceps rupture using the two-incision technique: a comparison series.使用双切口技术对肱二头肌远端断裂进行Endobutton与经骨缝合修复的比较系列研究
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):928-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.032. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
2
Low incidence of tendon rerupture after distal biceps repair by cortical button and interference screw.经皮质纽扣和干扰螺钉修复肱二头肌远端后,肌腱再断裂的发生率较低。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Oct;23(10):1532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.013.
3
A comparison of cortical button with interference screw versus suture anchor techniques for distal biceps brachii tendon repairs.
皮质纽扣与界面螺钉技术和缝线锚钉技术治疗肱二头肌长头腱远端止点修复的比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1607-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.049. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Ruptures of the distal biceps tendon.肱二头肌远端肌腱断裂。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014;72(1):110-9.
5
Double intramedullary cortical button versus suture anchors for distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison.双皮质骨纽扣与缝线锚钉用于肱二头肌远端肌腱修复的生物力学比较
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):926-33. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2590-0. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
6
The distal biceps tendon.肱二头肌远端肌腱。
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Apr;38(4):811-21; quiz 821. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.042. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
Distal biceps tendon rupture: current concepts.肱二头肌肌腱远端断裂:当前的概念。
Injury. 2013 Apr;44(4):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.029. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
8
Surgical repair of the distal biceps brachii tendon: a comparative study of three surgical fixation techniques.肱二头肌远端肌腱的手术修复:三种手术固定技术的对比研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1936-41. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1591-0. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
The double intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair.双髓内皮质纽扣固定修复肱二头肌肌腱远端。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Nov;19(11):1925-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1569-y. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Suture anchor reinsertion of distal biceps rupture: clinical results and radiological assessment of tendon healing.远端肱二头肌撕裂的缝线锚重新插入:肌腱愈合的临床结果和影像学评估。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 May;97(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.010. Epub 2011 Mar 29.