Woodworth Thasia G, Morgacheva Olga, Pimienta Olga L, Troum Orrin M, Ranganath Veena K, Furst Daniel E
Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Jul 1;56(7):1177-1188. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew445.
To examine whether the RA MRI score (RAMRIS) for RA of the wrist/hand meets the OMERACT filter criteria-truth (validity), discrimination and feasibility.
We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed and Scopus, from 1970 through June 2014, focused on MRI measures of synovitis, osteitis/bone marrow oedema, erosions and/or joint space narrowing in RA randomized controlled trials and observational studies with cohort size ⩾10. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook criteria.
Of 634 MRI titles/abstracts, 202 met the review criteria, with 92 providing at least 1 type of validity. Four articles provided criterion validity, and 26 articles utilized RAMRIS to assess 1.5 T MRI images. Histopathology data showed inflammation corresponding to MRI of synovitis and osteitis. MRI erosions corresponded to those identified with CT. Content and construct validity for RAMRIS synovitis, osteitis and erosions were documented by correlations with clinical, laboratory and/or radiographic data. Each measure was sensitive to change and responsive to therapy. RAMRIS synovitis and osteitis were able to discriminate between the efficacy of treatments vs placebo in 12-week studies, whereas RAMRIS erosions required studies of ⩾24 weeks.
RAMRIS synovitis, osteitis and erosions imaged with 1.5 T MRI are valid and useful for evaluating joint inflammation and damage for RA of the wrist/hand, according to the OMERACT filter.
探讨用于评估类风湿关节炎(RA)手腕/手部的RA MRI评分(RAMRIS)是否符合OMERACT筛选标准——真实性(有效性)、区分度和可行性。
我们在PubMed和Scopus数据库中进行了一项系统的文献综述,时间跨度从1970年至2014年6月,重点关注RA随机对照试验和队列规模⩾10的观察性研究中滑膜炎、骨炎/骨髓水肿、侵蚀和/或关节间隙变窄的MRI测量。使用Cochrane手册标准评估证据强度。
在634篇MRI标题/摘要中,202篇符合综述标准,其中92篇提供了至少一种有效性类型。4篇文章提供了标准效度,26篇文章使用RAMRIS评估1.5T MRI图像。组织病理学数据显示炎症与滑膜炎和骨炎的MRI表现相对应。MRI侵蚀与CT识别的侵蚀相对应。通过与临床、实验室和/或影像学数据的相关性记录了RAMRIS滑膜炎、骨炎和侵蚀的内容效度和结构效度。各项测量对变化敏感且对治疗有反应。在12周的研究中,RAMRIS滑膜炎和骨炎能够区分治疗与安慰剂的疗效,而RAMRIS侵蚀则需要⩾24周的研究。
根据OMERACT筛选标准,1.5T MRI成像的RAMRIS滑膜炎、骨炎和侵蚀对于评估手腕/手部RA的关节炎症和损伤是有效且有用的。