Suppr超能文献

近期发病的抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(ACPA)阳性和ACPA阴性类风湿关节炎的前足炎症:临床表现相似,但潜在的炎症组织不同。

Forefoot inflammation in recent-onset ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA: clinically similar, but different in underlying inflamed tissues.

作者信息

Ton Dennis A, van Dijk Bastiaan T, van Steenbergen Hanna W, van der Helm-van Mil Annette H M

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2024 Oct 2;10(4):e004722. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004722.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although joint swelling is traditionally interpreted as synovitis, recent imaging studies showed that there is also inflammation of tenosynovium and intermetatarsal bursae in the forefoot. We aimed to increase our understanding of differences and similarities regarding forefoot involvement between ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at diagnosis. Therefore, we (1) compared metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint counts, walking disabilities and inflamed tissues between ACPA groups and (2) studied associations of joint swelling/tenderness and walking disabilities with underlying inflamed tissues within ACPA groups.

METHODS

171 ACPA-positive and 203 ACPA-negative consecutively diagnosed patients with RA had a physical joint examination (swollen joint count-66/tender joint count-68), filled a Health Assessment Questionnaire including the domain walking and underwent MRI of the MTP joints at diagnosis. Synovitis, tenosynovitis, osteitis and intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) were assessed. Findings in age-matched healthy controls were applied to define abnormalities on MRI.

RESULTS

While ACPA-negative RA patients had more swollen joints (mean SJC 8 vs 6 in ACPA-positives, p=0.003), the number of swollen MTP joints was similar (mean 1 in both groups); walking disabilities were also equally common (49% vs 53%). In contrast, inflamed tissues were all more prevalent in ACPA-positive compared with ACPA-negative RA. Within ACPA-positive RA, IMB was associated independently with MTP-joint swelling (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.0) and tenderness (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.0). While in ACPA-negatives, synovitis was associated independently with MTP-joint swelling (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.8) and tenderness (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8). Tenosynovitis contributed most to walking disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the forefoot of ACPA-positives and ACPA-negatives share clinical similarities at diagnosis, there are differences in underlying inflamed tissues. This reinforces that ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA are different entities.

摘要

目的

尽管关节肿胀传统上被解释为滑膜炎,但最近的影像学研究表明,前足的腱鞘炎和跖间滑囊炎也存在炎症。我们旨在加深对ACPA阳性和ACPA阴性类风湿关节炎(RA)在诊断时前足受累的异同的理解。因此,我们(1)比较了ACPA组之间的跖趾(MTP)关节计数、行走障碍和炎症组织,以及(2)研究了ACPA组内关节肿胀/压痛与行走障碍与潜在炎症组织的关联。

方法

171例ACPA阳性和203例ACPA阴性的连续诊断为RA的患者进行了关节体格检查(肿胀关节计数-66/压痛关节计数-68),填写了包括行走领域的健康评估问卷,并在诊断时接受了MTP关节的MRI检查。评估滑膜炎、腱鞘炎、骨炎和跖间滑囊炎(IMB)。将年龄匹配的健康对照的结果用于定义MRI上的异常。

结果

虽然ACPA阴性RA患者的肿胀关节更多(ACPA阳性患者平均肿胀关节计数为8,ACPA阴性患者为6,p=0.003),但肿胀的MTP关节数量相似(两组均为平均1个);行走障碍也同样常见(49%对53%)。相比之下,与ACPA阴性RA相比,ACPA阳性RA中炎症组织更为普遍。在ACPA阳性RA中,IMB与MTP关节肿胀(OR 2.6,95%CI 1.4至5.0)和压痛(OR 3.0,95%CI 1.8至5.0)独立相关。而在ACPA阴性患者中,滑膜炎与MTP关节肿胀(OR 2.8,95%CI 1.4至5.8)和压痛(OR 2.5,95%CI 1.3至4.8)独立相关。腱鞘炎对行走障碍的影响最大。

结论

虽然ACPA阳性和ACPA阴性患者在诊断时前足有临床相似性,但潜在的炎症组织存在差异。这进一步证明ACPA阳性和ACPA阴性RA是不同的疾病实体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5df/11448120/bf9b6b302e41/rmdopen-10-4-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验