Diviani Nicola, Dima Alexandra Lelia, Schulz Peter Johannes
Department of Health Sciences & Health Policy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Person Centered Health Care & Health Communication Group, Human Functioning Unit, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 11;19(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6749.
The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) is a tool to assess consumers' comfort and skills in using information technologies for health. Although evidence exists of reliability and construct validity of the scale, less agreement exists on structural validity.
The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (I-eHEALS) in a community sample with a focus on its structural validity, by applying psychometric techniques that account for item difficulty.
Two Web-based surveys were conducted among a total of 296 people living in the Italian-speaking region of Switzerland (Ticino). After examining the latent variables underlying the observed variables of the Italian scale via principal component analysis (PCA), fit indices for two alternative models were calculated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The scale structure was examined via parametric and nonparametric item response theory (IRT) analyses accounting for differences between items regarding the proportion of answers indicating high ability. Convergent validity was assessed by correlations with theoretically related constructs.
CFA showed a suboptimal model fit for both models. IRT analyses confirmed all items measure a single dimension as intended. Reliability and construct validity of the final scale were also confirmed. The contrasting results of factor analysis (FA) and IRT analyses highlight the importance of considering differences in item difficulty when examining health literacy scales.
The findings support the reliability and validity of the translated scale and its use for assessing Italian-speaking consumers' eHealth literacy.
电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)是一种用于评估消费者使用信息技术获取健康信息的舒适度和技能的工具。尽管有证据表明该量表具有信度和结构效度,但在结构效度方面的共识较少。
本研究旨在通过应用考虑项目难度的心理测量技术,在一个社区样本中验证意大利版电子健康素养量表(I-eHEALS),重点关注其结构效度。
对居住在瑞士意大利语区(提契诺州)的296人进行了两项基于网络的调查。通过主成分分析(PCA)检查意大利量表观测变量背后的潜在变量后,使用验证性因素分析(CFA)计算两个替代模型的拟合指数。通过考虑高能力答案比例不同的参数和非参数项目反应理论(IRT)分析来检查量表结构。通过与理论相关结构的相关性评估收敛效度。
CFA显示两个模型的拟合度都不理想。IRT分析证实所有项目按预期测量单一维度。最终量表的信度和结构效度也得到了证实。因素分析(FA)和IRT分析的对比结果突出了在检查健康素养量表时考虑项目难度差异的重要性。
研究结果支持翻译后量表的信度和效度及其用于评估意大利语消费者的电子健康素养。