• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后个性化监测的有效性和成本效益评估

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

作者信息

McFerran Ethna, O'Mahony James F, Fallis Richard, McVicar Duncan, Zauber Ann G, Kee Frank

出版信息

Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):148-160. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx002.

DOI:10.1093/epirev/mxx002
PMID:28402402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5858033/
Abstract

Lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is 5%, and 5-year survival at early stage is 92%. Individuals with precancerous lesions removed at primary screening are typically recommended surveillance colonoscopy. Because greater benefits are anticipated for those with higher risk of colorectal cancer, scope for risk-specific surveillance recommendations exists. This review assesses published cost-effectiveness estimates of postpolypectomy surveillance to consider the potential for personalized recommendations by risk group. Meta-analyses of incidence of advanced neoplasia postpolypectomy for low-risk cases were comparable to those without adenoma, with both rates under the lifetime risk of 5%. This group may not benefit from intensive surveillance, which risks unnecessary harm and inefficient use of often scarce colonoscopy capacity. Therefore, greater personalization through deintensified strategies for low-risk individuals could be beneficial. The potential for noninvasive testing, such as fecal immunochemical tests, combined with primary prevention or chemoprevention may reserve colonoscopy for targeted use in personalized risk-stratified surveillance. This review appraised evidence supporting a program of personalized surveillance in patients with colorectal adenoma according to risk group and compared the effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy with alternative prevention strategies. It assessed trade-offs among costs, benefits, and adverse effects that must be considered in a decision to adopt or reject personalized surveillance.

摘要

患结直肠癌的终生风险为5%,早期的5年生存率为92%。在初次筛查时切除癌前病变的个体通常建议进行监测性结肠镜检查。由于预计结直肠癌风险较高的个体受益更大,因此存在针对特定风险的监测建议空间。本综述评估了已发表的息肉切除术后监测的成本效益估计,以考虑按风险组进行个性化建议的可能性。对低风险病例息肉切除术后高级别瘤变发生率的荟萃分析与无腺瘤者相当,两者发生率均低于5%的终生风险。该组可能无法从强化监测中获益,强化监测有造成不必要伤害和低效利用通常稀缺的结肠镜检查能力的风险。因此,通过对低风险个体采用弱化策略实现更大程度的个性化可能有益。粪便免疫化学检测等非侵入性检测与一级预防或化学预防相结合的可能性,可能会将结肠镜检查留作在个性化风险分层监测中进行有针对性的使用。本综述评估了支持根据风险组对结直肠腺瘤患者进行个性化监测方案的证据,并比较了监测性结肠镜检查与替代预防策略的有效性。它评估了在决定采用或拒绝个性化监测时必须考虑的成本、效益和不良反应之间的权衡。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.结直肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后个性化监测的有效性和成本效益评估
Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):148-160. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx002.
2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测联合或不联合息肉切除术后监测结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):544-554. doi: 10.7326/M16-2891. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
A loss-effectiveness analysis of risk-adapted surveillance after colorectal polypectomy.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:395-8.
4
Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)与结肠镜检查用于筛查和息肉切除后的监测:一项诊断准确性和成本效益研究。
Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1642-1652. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317297. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance using Japanese data.基于日本数据的息肉切除术后结肠镜检查监测的成本效益分析。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Jan;31(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/den.13250. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
6
Surveillance colonoscopy or chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors in average-risk post-polypectomy patients: a decision analysis.平均风险息肉切除术后患者的监测结肠镜检查或使用COX-2抑制剂进行化学预防:一项决策分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 May;15(5):631-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00969.x.
7
Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.腺瘤切除术后结肠镜随访以降低结直肠癌风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(26):1-156. doi: 10.3310/OLUE3796.
8
High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.高强度监测与低强度监测在结直肠腺瘤患者中的应用:成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):612-622. doi: 10.7326/M18-3633. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
9
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便免疫化学试验与结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查中的疗效和成本效益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):684-697.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
10
Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.中国南方人群息肉切除术后结直肠腺瘤的复发和监测。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(8):838-45. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0227-3. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of Berberine Chemoprevention for Colorectal Cancer After Polypectomy.息肉切除术后小檗碱化学预防结直肠癌的成本效用分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 24;16(5):e61030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61030. eCollection 2024 May.
2
FIT for purpose: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to personalize surveillance colonoscopy for individuals at elevated risk of colorectal cancer.目的明确:一项针对结直肠癌风险升高个体的个体化监测结肠镜检查的随机对照试验的研究方案。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jul 25;38(1):201. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04493-8.
3
Risk stratification for the detection of metachronous polyps after bowel screening polypectomy: clinical outcomes from the Integrated Technologies for Improved Polyp Surveillance (INCISE) study cohort.肠筛查息肉切除术后检测同时性息肉的风险分层:来自集成技术改善息肉监测(INCISE)研究队列的临床结果。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad034.
4
Mechanism of inflammasomes in cancer and targeted therapies.炎症小体在癌症中的作用机制及靶向治疗
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 20;13:1133013. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133013. eCollection 2023.
5
The role of miR-370 and miR-138 in the regulation of BMP2 suppressor gene expression in colorectal cancer: preliminary studies.miR-370 和 miR-138 在结直肠癌中调控 BMP2 抑制基因表达中的作用:初步研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul;148(7):1569-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03977-4. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
6
Biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancer non-invasively: DNA, RNA or proteins?用于非侵入性检测结直肠癌的生物标志物:DNA、RNA还是蛋白质?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Feb 15;12(2):124-148. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i2.124.
7
Response gene to complement 32 expression in macrophages augments paracrine stimulation-mediated colon cancer progression.巨噬细胞中补体 32 反应基因的表达增强了旁分泌刺激介导的结肠癌进展。
Cell Death Dis. 2019 Oct 10;10(10):776. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2006-2.
8
Reducing Cancer Burden in the Population: An Overview of Epidemiologic Evidence to Support Policies, Systems, and Environmental Changes.减轻人群中的癌症负担:支持政策、系统和环境变革的流行病学证据概述
Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx009.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards evidence based research.迈向循证研究。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 21;355:i5440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5440.
2
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
3
Colorectal Adenomas.结直肠腺瘤
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1065-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1513581.
4
Aspirin and colorectal cancer: the promise of precision chemoprevention.阿司匹林与结直肠癌:精准化学预防的前景
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Mar;16(3):173-86. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.4. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
5
Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.看得更清晰——关于优化结肠镜腺瘤检出率的循证推荐
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 7;22(5):1767-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767.
6
Post-Polypectomy Surveillance That Would Please Goldilocks--Not Too Much, Not Too Little, but Just Right.息肉切除术后的监测要恰到好处——不多,不少,刚刚好。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Apr;150(4):791-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
New bowel cancer screening test is recommended for England.
BMJ. 2016 Jan 17;352:i273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i273.
8
Beware of Kinked Frontiers: A Systematic Review of the Choice of Comparator Strategies in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Screening.谨防扭曲的边界:子宫颈癌筛查中人乳头瘤病毒检测成本效益分析中比较策略选择的系统评价
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1138-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2939. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
Where Do We Stand With Aspirin for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer? The USPSTF Recommendations.阿司匹林用于预防结直肠癌的现状如何?美国预防服务工作组的建议。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):14-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
Faecal haemoglobin concentration influences risk prediction of interval cancers resulting from inadequate colonoscopy quality: analysis of the Taiwanese Nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.粪便血红蛋白浓度影响因结肠镜检查质量不足导致的间期癌风险预测:台湾全国性结直肠癌筛查项目分析
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):293-300. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310256. Epub 2015 Oct 29.