• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠筛查息肉切除术后检测同时性息肉的风险分层:来自集成技术改善息肉监测(INCISE)研究队列的临床结果。

Risk stratification for the detection of metachronous polyps after bowel screening polypectomy: clinical outcomes from the Integrated Technologies for Improved Polyp Surveillance (INCISE) study cohort.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad034.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad034
PMID:37158435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10167706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After colorectal polypectomy, 20-50 per cent of patients develop metachronous polyps and some have increased colorectal cancer risk. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) 2020 guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy for high-risk patients based on index pathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate metachronous lesion outcome using BSG 2020 criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicentred study was conducted including patients who had polypectomy during screening colonoscopy (2009-2016) followed by surveillance. Demographics, index pathology, and BSG 2020 risk criteria were compared with regard to metachronous lesion pathology (non-advanced versus advanced lesions) and timing of detection (early versus late). Advanced lesions were defined as adenomas/serrated polyps greater than or equal to 10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, serrated polyps with dysplasia, or colorectal cancer, and late lesions those detected greater than 2 years after the index procedure.

RESULTS

Of 3090 eligible patients, 2643 were included. Among these, retrospective BSG 2020 application would have excluded 51.5 per cent from surveillance. After a median of 36 months, the advanced polyp/colorectal cancer rate in BSG 2020 high-risk patients was 16.3 versus 13.0 per cent in low-risk patients. Older age (P = 0.008) correlated with advanced metachronous lesions. Male sex, greater than five polyps, and BSG 2020 high-risk criteria correlated with non-advanced and advanced lesions (P < 0.001). Older age (P < 0.001), villous features (P = 0.006), advanced index polyp (P = 0.020), and greater than five polyps (P < 0.001) correlated with early metachronous lesions. Male sex and BSG 2020 high-risk criteria correlated with early and late lesions (P < 0.001). On multivariable regression, increased polyp number (odds ratio (OR) 1.15 (95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 1.25); P < 0.001) and villous features (OR 1.49 (95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.10); P = 0.025) independently correlated with early advanced lesions. The rate of non-advanced and advanced metachronous polyps was higher in BSG 2020 high- versus low-risk patients (44.4 versus 35.4 per cent for non-advanced and 15.7 versus 11.8 per cent for advanced; P < 0.001), but the colorectal cancer rate was similar (0.6 versus 1.2 per cent). However, when examining only lesions detected greater than 2 years after the index colonoscopy in high- versus low-risk patients, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.140).

CONCLUSION

BSG 2020 criteria correlated with metachronous polyps, but did not differentiate advanced and non-advanced lesions and were not predictive of late lesions.

摘要

背景

在结直肠息肉切除术后,20-50%的患者会出现多发性息肉,并且一些患者的结直肠癌风险增加。英国胃肠病学会(BSG)2020 年指南建议根据索引病理学对高危患者进行监测性结肠镜检查。本研究的目的是使用 BSG 2020 标准评估多发性病变的结果。

方法

进行了一项回顾性、多中心研究,包括在筛查性结肠镜检查期间(2009-2016 年)进行息肉切除术并随后进行监测的患者。比较了人口统计学、索引病理学和 BSG 2020 风险标准与多发性病变病理学(非高级病变与高级病变)和检测时间(早期与晚期)之间的关系。高级病变定义为大于或等于 10mm 的腺瘤/锯齿状息肉、高级别异型增生、锯齿状息肉伴异型增生或结直肠癌,晚期病变定义为在索引手术后 2 年以上检测到的病变。

结果

在 3090 名合格患者中,有 2643 名患者入选。在这些患者中,BSG 2020 标准的回溯应用将使 51.5%的患者无需进行监测。在中位数为 36 个月时,BSG 2020 高危患者的高级息肉/结直肠癌发生率为 16.3%,而低危患者为 13.0%。年龄较大(P=0.008)与高级别多发性病变相关。男性、大于五枚息肉和 BSG 2020 高危标准与非高级和高级病变相关(P<0.001)。年龄较大(P<0.001)、绒毛特征(P=0.006)、高级别索引息肉(P=0.020)和大于五枚息肉(P<0.001)与早期多发性病变相关。男性和 BSG 2020 高危标准与早期和晚期病变相关(P<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,息肉数量增加(比值比(OR)1.15(95%置信区间 1.07 至 1.25);P<0.001)和绒毛特征(OR 1.49(95%置信区间 1.05 至 2.10);P=0.025)与早期高级病变独立相关。BSG 2020 高危患者中非高级和高级多发性息肉的发生率高于低危患者(非高级患者为 44.4%比 35.4%,高级患者为 15.7%比 11.8%;P<0.001),但结直肠癌的发生率相似(0.6%比 1.2%)。然而,在高风险患者中仅检查指数结肠镜检查后大于 2 年检测到的病变时,未观察到显著差异(P=0.140)。

结论

BSG 2020 标准与多发性息肉相关,但不能区分高级和非高级病变,也不能预测晚期病变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfd/10167706/9ba8abd6913d/zrad034f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfd/10167706/51053ef407a8/zrad034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfd/10167706/9ba8abd6913d/zrad034f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfd/10167706/51053ef407a8/zrad034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cfd/10167706/9ba8abd6913d/zrad034f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk stratification for the detection of metachronous polyps after bowel screening polypectomy: clinical outcomes from the Integrated Technologies for Improved Polyp Surveillance (INCISE) study cohort.肠筛查息肉切除术后检测同时性息肉的风险分层:来自集成技术改善息肉监测(INCISE)研究队列的临床结果。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad034.
2
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.英国胃肠病学会/英国大肠直肠外科学会/英国公共卫生署息肉切除术后和结直肠癌切除术后监测指南。
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):201-223. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
3
Serrated Polyps in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Indicate a Similar Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasia as in the General Population.炎症性肠病中的锯齿状息肉提示异时性结直肠肿瘤发生风险与普通人群相似。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Jul;69(7):2595-2610. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08456-z. Epub 2024 May 3.
4
Diminutive Polyps With Advanced Histologic Features Do Not Increase Risk for Metachronous Advanced Colon Neoplasia.微小息肉伴高级别组织学特征并不增加结肠腺瘤性息肉患者的结直肠腺瘤复发风险。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Feb;156(3):623-634.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults.年轻成年人与异时性肿瘤:与老年人相比,未来发生晚期腺瘤和大的锯齿状息肉的风险
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):669-675. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.023. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps.常规腺瘤和锯齿状息肉切除后结直肠癌的长期风险。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):852-861.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.039. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Increased risk of metachronous large serrated polyps in individuals with 5- to 9-mm proximal hyperplastic polyps: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.5-9mm 近端增生性息肉患者中,多发性锯齿状大息肉的风险增加:来自新罕布什尔结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.034. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
8
[Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 Revised Edition].[韩国息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:2022年修订版]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 25;80(3):115-134. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2022.103.
9
Total polyp number may be more important than size and histology of polyps for prediction of metachronous high-risk colorectal neoplasms.总的息肉数量可能比息肉的大小和组织学更重要,可用于预测同时发生的高风险结直肠肿瘤。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02177-1.
10
Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.息肉切除术后监测间隔时间与高级别瘤变检出率:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2022 Oct;54(10):948-958. doi: 10.1055/a-1795-4673. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning in colorectal polyp surveillance: A paradigm shift in post-endoscopic mucosal resection follow-up.机器学习在结直肠息肉监测中的应用:内镜下黏膜切除术后随访的范式转变
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 21;31(19):106628. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i19.106628.
2
Retrospective Cohort Study: Scope for Improvement-Barriers to Post-Polypectomy Surveillance in the Integrated Technologies for Improved Polyp Surveillance Cohort.回顾性队列研究:改进的范围——息肉监测综合技术队列中息肉切除术后监测的障碍
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;61(8):1381-1386. doi: 10.1111/apt.18514. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Methods of Risk Stratifying Patients for Metachronous, Pre-Malignant Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review.新型风险分层方法在结直肠多发腺瘤及早期癌变中的应用:系统综述
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Aug;164:103421. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103421. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
2
Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.多中心回顾性队列研究中息肉切除术后结直肠癌风险:对 2020 年英国息肉切除术后监测指南的评估。
Gut. 2021 Dec;70(12):2307-2320. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323411. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.
英国胃肠病学会/英国大肠直肠外科学会/英国公共卫生署息肉切除术后和结直肠癌切除术后监测指南。
Gut. 2020 Feb;69(2):201-223. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Risk Factors for Recurrent Colorectal Polyps.结直肠息肉复发的危险因素。
Gut Liver. 2020 Jul 15;14(4):399-411. doi: 10.5009/gnl19097.
5
The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps: Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features.结直肠息肉的自然史:预测静态和动态特征概述。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Sep;47(3):515-536. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Role of baseline adenoma characteristics for adenoma recurrencein patients with high-risk adenoma.高危腺瘤患者中基线腺瘤特征对腺瘤复发的作用
Turk J Med Sci. 2017 Nov 13;47(5):1416-1424. doi: 10.3906/sag-1502-105.
7
The clinical effectiveness of different surveillance strategies to prevent colorectal cancer in people with intermediate-grade colorectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort analysis, and psychological and economic evaluations.不同监测策略对中级别结直肠腺瘤患者预防结直肠癌的临床有效性:一项回顾性队列分析以及心理和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(25):1-536. doi: 10.3310/hta21250.
8
Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study.腺瘤监测与结直肠癌发病率:一项回顾性、多中心、队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):823-834. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30187-0. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
9
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.结直肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后个性化监测的有效性和成本效益评估
Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):148-160. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx002.
10
Determining the optimal surveillance interval after a colonoscopic polypectomy for the Korean population?确定韩国人群结肠镜息肉切除术后的最佳监测间隔?
Intest Res. 2017 Jan;15(1):109-117. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.109. Epub 2017 Jan 31.