Fuentes H E, Oramas D M, Paz L H, Casanegra A I, Mansfield A S, Tafur A J
Department of Internal Medicine, John Stroger Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States.
Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Thromb Res. 2017 Jun;154:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
Venous thromboembolism (Wickham et al., 2012 [1]) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer; however, primary thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) to measure the impact of primary VTE prevention and its effect on mortality among patients with lung cancer.
With assistance from a master librarian, we searched Ovid, Scopus, DARE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM reviews-Cochrane database of systematic reviews, EBM reviews-ACP journal, and EBM Reviews-Databases for relevant studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included articles addressing the role of anticoagulation in patients with lung cancer for primary VTE prevention for outpatients. The clinical outcomes were VTE occurrence, all-cause mortality, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and data were analyzed using R and R META package (Version 0.8-2, Author: Guido Schwarzer).
Eleven studies with 5107 patients were included for the final analysis. We found 50% lower VTE occurrence in the prophylaxis group with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (OR: 0.50; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.38-0.66; I2: 0%) without an increased bleeding risk (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 0.78-5.25; I2: 71.1%). We found a mortality benefit when we grouped all VTE prevention modalities [LMWH, Warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH)] (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; I2: 18.4%), but no significant difference when LMWH (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.49-1.11; I2: 56.9%) and warfarin were analyzed individually (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.47-1.21; I2: 0%). We found higher odds of bleeding combining all treatment modalities (OR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.64-5.72; I2: 64.4%) with the greatest occurrence in the warfarin group (OR: 5.42; 95% CI: 3.48-8.45; I2: 45.7%).
Primary VTE prophylaxis with LMWH reduces the occurrence of VTE among ambulatory patients with lung cancer, without apparent increase in bleeding risk. There is a measurable mortality benefit of anticoagulation strategies that remains elusive when the analysis is restricted to a single agent.
静脉血栓栓塞症(威克姆等人,2012年[1])是癌症患者发病和死亡的主要原因之一;然而,目前并不常规推荐进行一级血栓预防。我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估一级静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防的效果及其对肺癌患者死亡率的影响。
在一位资深图书馆员的协助下,我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在Ovid、Scopus、DARE、CINAHL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、循证医学评价-考克兰系统评价数据库、循证医学评价-美国医师协会杂志以及循证医学评价-数据库中检索相关研究。我们纳入了探讨抗凝在肺癌患者一级VTE预防中作用的文章,针对门诊患者。临床结局包括VTE发生情况、全因死亡率、大出血和具有临床意义的非大出血。结果以比值比(OR)呈现,并使用R和R META软件包(版本0.8 - 2,作者:吉多·施瓦泽)进行数据分析。
最终分析纳入了11项研究,共5107例患者。我们发现,使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)的预防组VTE发生率降低了50%(OR:0.50;95%置信区间(CI):0.38 - 0.66;I²:0%),且出血风险未增加(OR:2.03;95% CI:0.78 - 5.25;I²:71.1%)。当我们将所有VTE预防方式[LMWH、华法林、普通肝素(UFH)]合并分析时,发现有死亡率获益(OR:0.75;95% CI:0.58 - 0.96;I²:18.4%),但单独分析LMWH(OR:0.74;95% CI:0.49 - 1.11;I²:56.9%)和华法林时(OR:0.75;95% CI:0.47 - 1.21;I²:0%),未发现显著差异。我们发现,所有治疗方式联合使用时出血几率更高(OR:3.06;95% CI:1.64 - 5.72;I²:64.4%),其中华法林组出血发生率最高(OR:5.42;95% CI:3.48 - 8.45;I²:45.7%)。
使用LMWH进行一级VTE预防可降低肺癌门诊患者VTE的发生率,且出血风险无明显增加。抗凝策略具有可衡量的死亡率获益,但当分析仅限于单一药物时,这种获益并不明显。