Suppr超能文献

感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病者的宗教和精神应对方式。

Religious and spiritual coping in people living with HIV/Aids.

作者信息

Pinho Clarissa Mourão, Dâmaso Bruno Felipe Remigio, Gomes Eduardo Tavares, Trajano Maria de Fátima Cordeiro, Andrade Maria Sandra, Valença Marília Perrelli

机构信息

Associate Program in Postgraduate Program Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Nossa Senhora das Graças, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Residency Program in Nursing, University Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2017 Apr;70(2):392-399. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2015-0170.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

evaluate the religiosity and the religious/spiritual coping of people living with HIV/Aids.

METHOD

descriptive, cross-sectional study with quantitative approach, conducted in a reference HIV/Aids outpatient clinic in a university hospital of Recife-PE, Brazil, from June to November 2015. At total of 52 people living with HIV/Aids (PLWHA) participated in the research, which employed own questionnaire, the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), and the Religious/Spiritual Coping Scale (RCOPE).

RESULTS

the sample presented high indices of organizational religiosity (4.23±1.66), non-organizational religiosity (4.63±1.50), and intrinsic religiosity (13.13±2.84). Positive RCOPE was used in high mean scores (3.66±0.88), and negative RCOPE had low use (2.12 ± 0.74). In total, use of RCOPE was high (3.77±0.74), having predominated the positive RCOPE (NegRCOPE/PosRCOPE ratio=0.65±0.46).

CONCLUSION

it is evident the importance of encouraging religious activity and RCOPE strategies, seen in the past as inappropriate interventions in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者的宗教信仰及宗教/精神应对方式。

方法

采用描述性横断面研究,定量分析方法,于2015年6月至11月在巴西累西腓市一所大学医院的艾滋病病毒/艾滋病专科门诊进行。共有52名艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者参与研究,研究采用自行设计的问卷、杜克大学宗教指数(DUREL)和宗教/精神应对量表(RCOPE)。

结果

样本呈现出较高的组织性宗教信仰指数(4.23±1.66)、非组织性宗教信仰指数(4.63±1.50)和内在宗教信仰指数(13.13±2.84)。积极宗教/精神应对方式的平均得分较高(3.66±0.88),消极宗教/精神应对方式的使用较少(2.12±0.74)。总体而言,宗教/精神应对方式的使用频率较高(3.77±0.74),积极宗教/精神应对方式占主导(消极宗教/精神应对方式与积极宗教/精神应对方式的比例=0.65±0.46)。

结论

鼓励宗教活动和宗教/精神应对策略的重要性显而易见,过去这些被视为临床实践中不适当的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验