Ray G Thomas, Lewis Ned, Goddard Kristin, Ross Pat, Duffy Jonathan, DeStefano Frank, Baxter Roger, Klein Nicola P
Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center and Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern California Region, Oakland, CA, United States.
Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center and Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern California Region, Oakland, CA, United States.
Vaccine. 2017 May 9;35(20):2668-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.082. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
To investigate whether there is a difference in the risk of asthma exacerbations between children with pre-existing asthma who receive live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) compared with inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV).
We identified IIV and LAIV immunizations occurring between July 1, 2007 and March 31, 2014 among Kaiser Permanente Northern California members aged 2 to <18years with a history of asthma, and subsequent asthma exacerbations seen in the inpatient or Emergency Department (ED) setting. We calculated the ratio of the odds (OR) of an exacerbation being in the risk interval (1-14days) versus the comparison interval (29-42days) following immunization, separately for LAIV and IIV, and then examined whether the OR differed between children receiving LAIV and those receiving IIV ("difference-in-differences").
Among 387,633 immunizations, 85% were IIV and 15% were LAIV. Children getting LAIV vs. IIV were less likely to have "current or recent, persistent" asthma (25% vs. 47%), and more likely to have "remote history" of asthma (47% vs. 25%). Among IIV-vaccinated asthmatic children, the OR of an inpatient/ED asthma exacerbation was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.82-1.15). Among LAIV-vaccinated asthmatic children the OR was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17-0.90). In the difference-in-differences analysis, the odds of asthma exacerbation following LAIV were less than IIV (Ratio of ORs: 0.40, CI: 0.17-0.95, p value: 0.04).
Among children ≥2years old with asthma, we found no increased risk of asthma exacerbation following LAIV or IIV, and a decreased risk following LAIV compared to IIV.
调查患有哮喘的儿童接种减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)与接种灭活流感疫苗(IIV)相比,哮喘急性发作风险是否存在差异。
我们确定了2007年7月1日至2014年3月31日期间,北加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团中年龄在2岁至未满18岁且有哮喘病史的成员接种IIV和LAIV的情况,以及随后在住院部或急诊科出现的哮喘急性发作情况。我们分别计算了LAIV和IIV接种后,急性发作处于风险区间(1 - 14天)与对照区间(29 - 42天)的比值比(OR),然后检查接受LAIV的儿童与接受IIV的儿童之间的OR是否存在差异(“差异中的差异”)。
在387,633次接种中,85%为IIV,15%为LAIV。与接受IIV的儿童相比,接受LAIV的儿童患“当前或近期持续性”哮喘的可能性较小(25%对47%),而有“既往哮喘病史”的可能性较大(47%对25%)。在接种IIV的哮喘儿童中,住院/急诊科哮喘急性发作的OR为0.97(95%置信区间:0.82 - 1.15)。在接种LAIV的哮喘儿童中,OR为0.38(95%置信区间:0.17 - 0.90)。在差异中的差异分析中,LAIV接种后哮喘急性发作的几率低于IIV(OR比值:0.40,置信区间:0.17 - 0.95,p值:0.04)。
在≥2岁的哮喘儿童中,我们发现接种LAIV或IIV后哮喘急性发作风险没有增加,且与IIV相比,LAIV接种后风险降低。