• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Asthma exacerbations among asthmatic children receiving live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccines.接受减毒活流感疫苗与灭活流感疫苗的哮喘儿童的哮喘加重情况。
Vaccine. 2017 May 9;35(20):2668-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.082. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
2
Safety of guidelines recommending live attenuated influenza vaccine for routine use in children and adolescents with asthma.指南推荐使用减毒活流感疫苗作为儿童和青少年哮喘常规使用的安全性。
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 9;37(30):4055-4060. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.081. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Effectiveness of Live Attenuated vs Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Children During the 2012-2013 Through 2015-2016 Influenza Seasons in Alberta, Canada: A Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Study.2012-2013 至 2015-2016 流感季节期间,加拿大艾伯塔省儿童使用减毒活疫苗与灭活流感疫苗的效果:加拿大免疫研究网络(CIRN)研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 1;172(9):e181514. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1514. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Live Attenuated Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Hutterite Children: A Cluster Randomized Blinded Trial.活疫苗与灭活流感疫苗在胡特尔儿童中的应用:一项集群随机、盲法试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;165(9):617-624. doi: 10.7326/M16-0513. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Influenza vaccination type, live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) versus inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), received by children, United States, 2011-12 through 2013-14 influenza seasons.2011 - 12年至2013 - 14年流感季节美国儿童接种的流感疫苗类型,即减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)与灭活流感疫苗(IIV)。
Vaccine. 2015 Sep 22;33(39):5196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.064. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
Vaccine failure and serologic response to live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in children during the 2013-2014 season.2013-2014 年度儿童中流感减毒活疫苗和灭活疫苗接种失败与血清学反应。
Vaccine. 2018 Feb 21;36(9):1214-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.016.
7
Efficacy of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines among children in rural India: A 2-year, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.印度农村地区儿童中减毒活疫苗和灭活流感疫苗的效果:一项为期 2 年的随机、三盲、安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Apr 29;18(4):e1003609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003609. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine for U.S. Children: Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccine.美国儿童流感疫苗的成本效益:减毒活流感疫苗和灭活流感疫苗
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Sep;51(3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.027. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Randomized evaluation of live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines in schools (RELATIVES) pilot study: a cluster randomized trial.学校中减毒活流感疫苗与灭活流感疫苗的随机评估(RELATIVES)试点研究:一项整群随机试验
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 15;33(4):535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.044. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
10
Safety of LAIV Vaccination in Asthma or Wheeze: A Systematic Review and GRADE Assessment.哮喘或喘息患者接种流感减毒活疫苗的安全性:系统评价与GRADE评估
Pediatrics. 2025 May 1;155(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068459.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of Asthma Exacerbations and Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Among Adults With Asthma According to Vaccination Status: Does the annual influenza vaccine have a protective effect?根据疫苗接种状况分析哮喘成人患者中哮喘急性加重和上呼吸道感染的发生率:年度流感疫苗是否具有保护作用?
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2024 Feb;24(1):70-75. doi: 10.18295/squmj.9.2023.053. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Challenges in the Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Pediatric Asthma.儿童哮喘药物治疗管理中的挑战
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;15(12):1581. doi: 10.3390/ph15121581.
3
Impact of Therapeutics on Unified Immunity During Allergic Asthma and Respiratory Infections.治疗方法对过敏性哮喘和呼吸道感染期间整体免疫的影响。
Front Allergy. 2022 Mar 25;3:852067. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.852067. eCollection 2022.
4
Safety of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Children With Asthma.儿童哮喘患者应用减毒活流感疫苗的安全性。
Pediatrics. 2022 Apr 1;149(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055432.
5
Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children with moderate to severe asthma.儿童中重度哮喘患者应用减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)的安全性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;145(4):1157-1164.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
6
Asthma.哮喘
Pediatr Rev. 2019 Nov;40(11):549-567. doi: 10.1542/pir.2018-0282.
7
Safety of guidelines recommending live attenuated influenza vaccine for routine use in children and adolescents with asthma.指南推荐使用减毒活流感疫苗作为儿童和青少年哮喘常规使用的安全性。
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 9;37(30):4055-4060. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.081. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Evaluation of the safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in children and adolescents with asthma and high-risk conditions: a population-based prospective cohort study conducted in England with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.评估在患有哮喘和高风险疾病的儿童和青少年中使用减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)的安全性:在英格兰进行的一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,该研究使用了临床实践研究数据链接。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 9;8(12):e023118. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023118.
9
The safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in children and adolescents 2 through 17 years of age: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study.2至17岁儿童和青少年使用减毒活流感疫苗的安全性:一项疫苗安全数据链研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jan;27(1):59-68. doi: 10.1002/pds.4349. Epub 2017 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines.季节性流感疫苗预防和控制。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Aug 26;65(5):1-54. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6505a1.
2
Case-centered Analysis of Optic Neuritis After Vaccines.疫苗接种后视神经炎的病例分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 1;63(1):79-81. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw224. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
3
Sudden-Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss after Immunization: A Case-Centered Analysis.免疫接种后突发性感音神经性听力损失:一项以病例为中心的分析
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jul;155(1):81-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599816639043. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Prevention and Control of Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015-16 Influenza Season.流感疫苗预防与控制:美国免疫实践咨询委员会针对2015 - 16流感季的建议
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Aug 7;64(30):818-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6430a3.
5
Safety of measles-containing vaccines in 1-year-old children.1 岁儿童麻疹疫苗的安全性。
Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):e321-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1822. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
6
Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) -- United States, 2014-15 influenza season.季节性流感疫苗预防和控制:免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)的建议--美国,2014-15 流感季节。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Aug 15;63(32):691-7.
7
Vaccines for preventing influenza in people with asthma.用于预防哮喘患者流感的疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD000364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000364.pub4.
8
A postlicensure evaluation of the safety of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in children 24-59 months of age.24-59 月龄儿童中安阿伯株活减毒流感疫苗上市后安全性评价。
Vaccine. 2013 Apr 3;31(14):1812-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.01.055. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
A US postmarketing evaluation of the frequency and safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine use in nonrecommended children younger than 5 years: 2009-2010 season.美国对推荐年龄以下(5 岁以下)儿童使用非推荐活减毒流感疫苗的频率和安全性的上市后评估:2009-2010 季节。
Vaccine. 2012 Sep 14;30(42):6099-102. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.031. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
10
Immunization and Bell's palsy in children: a case-centered analysis.儿童免疫接种与贝尔氏麻痹:以病例为中心的分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 May 1;175(9):878-85. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws011. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

接受减毒活流感疫苗与灭活流感疫苗的哮喘儿童的哮喘加重情况。

Asthma exacerbations among asthmatic children receiving live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccines.

作者信息

Ray G Thomas, Lewis Ned, Goddard Kristin, Ross Pat, Duffy Jonathan, DeStefano Frank, Baxter Roger, Klein Nicola P

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center and Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern California Region, Oakland, CA, United States.

Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center and Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern California Region, Oakland, CA, United States.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2017 May 9;35(20):2668-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.082. Epub 2017 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.082
PMID:28404355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6636629/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether there is a difference in the risk of asthma exacerbations between children with pre-existing asthma who receive live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) compared with inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified IIV and LAIV immunizations occurring between July 1, 2007 and March 31, 2014 among Kaiser Permanente Northern California members aged 2 to <18years with a history of asthma, and subsequent asthma exacerbations seen in the inpatient or Emergency Department (ED) setting. We calculated the ratio of the odds (OR) of an exacerbation being in the risk interval (1-14days) versus the comparison interval (29-42days) following immunization, separately for LAIV and IIV, and then examined whether the OR differed between children receiving LAIV and those receiving IIV ("difference-in-differences").

RESULTS

Among 387,633 immunizations, 85% were IIV and 15% were LAIV. Children getting LAIV vs. IIV were less likely to have "current or recent, persistent" asthma (25% vs. 47%), and more likely to have "remote history" of asthma (47% vs. 25%). Among IIV-vaccinated asthmatic children, the OR of an inpatient/ED asthma exacerbation was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.82-1.15). Among LAIV-vaccinated asthmatic children the OR was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17-0.90). In the difference-in-differences analysis, the odds of asthma exacerbation following LAIV were less than IIV (Ratio of ORs: 0.40, CI: 0.17-0.95, p value: 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Among children ≥2years old with asthma, we found no increased risk of asthma exacerbation following LAIV or IIV, and a decreased risk following LAIV compared to IIV.

摘要

目的

调查患有哮喘的儿童接种减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)与接种灭活流感疫苗(IIV)相比,哮喘急性发作风险是否存在差异。

材料与方法

我们确定了2007年7月1日至2014年3月31日期间,北加利福尼亚州凯撒医疗集团中年龄在2岁至未满18岁且有哮喘病史的成员接种IIV和LAIV的情况,以及随后在住院部或急诊科出现的哮喘急性发作情况。我们分别计算了LAIV和IIV接种后,急性发作处于风险区间(1 - 14天)与对照区间(29 - 42天)的比值比(OR),然后检查接受LAIV的儿童与接受IIV的儿童之间的OR是否存在差异(“差异中的差异”)。

结果

在387,633次接种中,85%为IIV,15%为LAIV。与接受IIV的儿童相比,接受LAIV的儿童患“当前或近期持续性”哮喘的可能性较小(25%对47%),而有“既往哮喘病史”的可能性较大(47%对25%)。在接种IIV的哮喘儿童中,住院/急诊科哮喘急性发作的OR为0.97(95%置信区间:0.82 - 1.15)。在接种LAIV的哮喘儿童中,OR为0.38(95%置信区间:0.17 - 0.90)。在差异中的差异分析中,LAIV接种后哮喘急性发作的几率低于IIV(OR比值:0.40,置信区间:0.17 - 0.95,p值:0.04)。

结论

在≥2岁的哮喘儿童中,我们发现接种LAIV或IIV后哮喘急性发作风险没有增加,且与IIV相比,LAIV接种后风险降低。