Cates Christopher J, Rowe Brian H
Population Health Sciences and Education, St George’s, University of London, London,
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD000364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000364.pub4.
Influenza vaccination is recommended for asthmatic patients in many countries as observational studies have shown that influenza infection can be associated with asthma exacerbations. However, influenza vaccination has the potential to cause wheezing and adversely affect pulmonary function. While an overview concluded that there was no clear benefit of influenza vaccination in patients with asthma, this conclusion was not based on a systematic search of the literature.
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccination in children and adults with asthma.
We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reviewed reference lists of articles. The latest search was carried out in November 2012.
We included randomised trials of influenza vaccination in children (over two years of age) and adults with asthma. We excluded studies involving people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Inclusion criteria and assessment of trial quality were applied by two review authors independently. Data extraction was done by two review authors independently. Study authors were contacted for missing information.
Nine trials were included in the first published version of this review, and nine further trials have been included in four updates. The included studies cover a wide diversity of people, settings and types of influenza vaccination, and we pooled data from the studies that employed similar vaccines. PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE DURING THE INFLUENZA SEASON: A single parallel-group trial, involving 696 children, was able to assess the protective effects of influenza vaccination. There was no significant reduction in the number, duration or severity of influenza-related asthma exacerbations. There was no difference in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) although children who had been vaccinated had better symptom scores during influenza-positive weeks. Two parallel-group trials in adults did not contribute data to these outcomes due to very low levels of confirmed influenza infection. ADVERSE EFFECTS OF INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VACCINE IN THE FIRST TWO WEEKS FOLLOWING VACCINATION: Two cross-over trials involving 1526 adults and 712 children (over three years old) with asthma compared inactivated trivalent split-virus influenza vaccine with a placebo injection. These trials excluded any clinically important increase in asthma exacerbations in the two weeks following influenza vaccination (risk difference 0.014; 95% confidence interval -0.010 to 0.037). However, there was significant heterogeneity between the findings of two trials involving 1104 adults in terms of asthma exacerbations in the first three days after vaccination with split-virus or surface-antigen inactivated vaccines. There was no significant difference in measures of healthcare utilisation, days off school/symptom-free days, mean lung function or medication usage.EFFECTS OF LIVE ATTENUATED (INTRANASAL) INFLUENZA VACCINATION: There were no significant differences found in exacerbations or measures of lung function following live attenuated cold recombinant vaccine versus placebo in two small studies on 17 adults and 48 children. There were no significant differences in asthma exacerbations found for the comparison live attenuated vaccine (intranasal) versus trivalent inactivated vaccine (intramuscular) in one study on 2229 children (over six years of age).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty remains about the degree of protection that vaccination affords against asthma exacerbations that are related to influenza infection. Evidence from more recently published randomised trials of inactivated split-virus influenza vaccination indicates that there is no significant increase in asthma exacerbations immediately after vaccination in adults or children over three years of age. We were unable to address concerns regarding possible increased wheezing and hospital admissions in infants given live intranasal vaccination.
在许多国家,建议哮喘患者接种流感疫苗,因为观察性研究表明,流感感染可能与哮喘加重有关。然而,流感疫苗接种有可能引发喘息并对肺功能产生不利影响。虽然一项综述得出结论,哮喘患者接种流感疫苗没有明显益处,但该结论并非基于对文献的系统检索。
本综述的目的是评估流感疫苗接种对哮喘儿童和成人的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane气道组试验注册库,并查阅了文章的参考文献列表。最近一次检索于2012年11月进行。
我们纳入了针对哮喘儿童(两岁以上)和成人的流感疫苗接种随机试验。我们排除了涉及慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的研究。
两名综述作者独立应用入选标准并评估试验质量。两名综述作者独立进行数据提取。就缺失信息与研究作者进行了联系。
本综述的首次发表版本纳入了9项试验,在4次更新中又纳入了9项试验。纳入的研究涵盖了广泛的人群、环境和流感疫苗接种类型,我们汇总了使用相似疫苗的研究数据。
一项涉及696名儿童的单组平行试验能够评估流感疫苗接种的保护作用。与流感相关的哮喘加重的次数、持续时间或严重程度没有显著降低。一秒用力呼气量(FEV)没有差异,尽管接种疫苗的儿童在流感阳性周的症状评分更好。两项针对成人的平行试验由于确诊流感感染水平极低,未提供这些结果的数据。
两项交叉试验涉及1526名成人和712名三岁以上哮喘儿童(三岁以上),将三价裂解病毒流感灭活疫苗与安慰剂注射进行了比较。这些试验排除了流感疫苗接种后两周内哮喘加重的任何具有临床意义的增加(风险差异0.014;95%置信区间-0.010至0.037)。然而,在两项涉及1104名成人的试验结果中,关于接种裂解病毒或表面抗原灭活疫苗后前三天的哮喘加重情况存在显著异质性。在医疗保健利用、缺课天数/无症状天数、平均肺功能或药物使用方面没有显著差异。
减毒活(鼻内)流感疫苗接种的效果:在两项针对17名成人和48名儿童的小型研究中,减毒活冷重组疫苗与安慰剂相比,在加重情况或肺功能指标方面没有发现显著差异。在一项针对2229名六岁以上儿童的研究中,减毒活疫苗(鼻内)与三价灭活疫苗(肌肉注射)相比,在哮喘加重方面没有发现显著差异。
疫苗接种对与流感感染相关的哮喘加重的保护程度仍不确定。最近发表的关于灭活裂解病毒流感疫苗接种的随机试验证据表明,三岁以上成人或儿童接种疫苗后哮喘加重情况没有显著增加。我们无法解决关于给婴儿接种鼻内减毒活疫苗可能增加喘息和住院风险的担忧。