Suppr超能文献

父母何时以及为何促使孩子道歉:违规类型和教养方式的作用。

When and Why Parents Prompt Their Children to Apologize: The Roles of Transgression Type and Parenting Style.

作者信息

Smith Craig E, Noh Jee Young, Rizzo Michael T, Harris Paul L

机构信息

University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, North Ingalls Building, 10 Floor, 300 N. Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, 617-875-9469.

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, 3304 Benjamin Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

出版信息

J Fam Stud. 2017;23(1):38-61. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1176588. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

Abstract

Young children are sensitive to the importance of apologies, yet little is known about when and why parents prompt apologies from children. We examined these issues with parents of 3-10-year-old children ( = 483). Parents judged it to be important for children to apologize following both intentional and accidental morally-relevant transgressions, and they anticipated prompting apologies in both contexts, showing an 'outcome bias' (i.e., a concern for the outcomes of children's transgressions rather than for their underlying intentions). Parents viewed apologies as less important after children's breaches of social convention; parents recognized differences between social domains in their responses to children's transgressions. Irrespective of parenting style, parents were influenced in similar fashion by particular combinations of transgressions and victims, though permissive parents were least likely to anticipate prompting apologies. Parents endorsed different reasons for prompting apologies as a function of transgression type, suggesting that they attend to key features of their children's transgressions when deciding when to prompt apologies.

摘要

幼儿对道歉的重要性很敏感,但对于父母何时以及为何促使孩子道歉却知之甚少。我们对3至10岁孩子的父母(N = 483)进行了调查,以研究这些问题。父母认为,孩子在故意和意外的道德相关违规行为后道歉都很重要,并且他们预计在这两种情况下都会促使孩子道歉,表现出一种“结果偏见”(即关注孩子违规行为的结果而非其潜在意图)。在孩子违反社会习俗后,父母认为道歉没那么重要;父母认识到在对孩子违规行为的反应中社会领域存在差异。无论育儿方式如何,父母都会受到违规行为和受害者特定组合的类似影响,尽管宽容型父母最不可能预计会促使孩子道歉。父母根据违规类型认可促使孩子道歉的不同原因,这表明他们在决定何时促使孩子道歉时会关注孩子违规行为的关键特征。

相似文献

2
4
Evaluations of moral and conventional intergroup transgressions.对道德和常规群体间违规行为的评估。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;34(4):489-501. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12145. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Apologies repair children's trust: The mediating role of emotions.道歉修复儿童的信任:情绪的中介作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Dec;176:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
Costly group apology communicates a group's sincere "intention".昂贵的群体道歉传达了群体真诚的“意图”。
Soc Neurosci. 2020 Apr;15(2):244-254. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1697745. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Morality, Intentionality, and Intergroup Attitudes.道德、意向性与群体间态度。
Behaviour. 2014;151(2-3):337-359. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003132.
3
Domain differences in early social interactions.早期社会互动中的领域差异。
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):817-25. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12002. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
4
Young children's responses to guilt displays.幼儿对内疚表现的反应。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1248-62. doi: 10.1037/a0024462.
5
The accidental transgressor: morally-relevant theory of mind.意外的违规者:与道德相关的心理理论。
Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验