Smith Craig E, Noh Jee Young, Rizzo Michael T, Harris Paul L
University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, North Ingalls Building, 10 Floor, 300 N. Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, 617-875-9469.
Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, 3304 Benjamin Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
J Fam Stud. 2017;23(1):38-61. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1176588. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Young children are sensitive to the importance of apologies, yet little is known about when and why parents prompt apologies from children. We examined these issues with parents of 3-10-year-old children ( = 483). Parents judged it to be important for children to apologize following both intentional and accidental morally-relevant transgressions, and they anticipated prompting apologies in both contexts, showing an 'outcome bias' (i.e., a concern for the outcomes of children's transgressions rather than for their underlying intentions). Parents viewed apologies as less important after children's breaches of social convention; parents recognized differences between social domains in their responses to children's transgressions. Irrespective of parenting style, parents were influenced in similar fashion by particular combinations of transgressions and victims, though permissive parents were least likely to anticipate prompting apologies. Parents endorsed different reasons for prompting apologies as a function of transgression type, suggesting that they attend to key features of their children's transgressions when deciding when to prompt apologies.
幼儿对道歉的重要性很敏感,但对于父母何时以及为何促使孩子道歉却知之甚少。我们对3至10岁孩子的父母(N = 483)进行了调查,以研究这些问题。父母认为,孩子在故意和意外的道德相关违规行为后道歉都很重要,并且他们预计在这两种情况下都会促使孩子道歉,表现出一种“结果偏见”(即关注孩子违规行为的结果而非其潜在意图)。在孩子违反社会习俗后,父母认为道歉没那么重要;父母认识到在对孩子违规行为的反应中社会领域存在差异。无论育儿方式如何,父母都会受到违规行为和受害者特定组合的类似影响,尽管宽容型父母最不可能预计会促使孩子道歉。父母根据违规类型认可促使孩子道歉的不同原因,这表明他们在决定何时促使孩子道歉时会关注孩子违规行为的关键特征。