Selonen Vesa, Wistbacka Ralf
Section of Ecology Department of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland.
Department of Biology University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 2;7(7):2204-2213. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2814. eCollection 2017 Apr.
The lifetime movements of an individual determine the gene flow and invasion potential of the species. However, sex dependence of dispersal and selective pressures driving dispersal have gained much more attention than dispersal at different life and age stages. Natal dispersal is more common than dispersal between breeding attempts, but breeding dispersal may be promoted by resource availability and competition. Here, we utilize mark-recapture data on the nest-box population of Siberian flying squirrels to analyze lifetime dispersal patterns. Natal dispersal means the distance between the natal nest and the nest used the following year, whereas breeding movements refer to the nest site changes between breeding attempts. The movement distances observed here were comparable to distances reported earlier from radio-telemetry studies. Breeding movements did not contribute to lifetime dispersal distance and were not related to variation in food abundance or habitat patch size. Breeding movements of males were negatively, albeit not strongly, related to male population size. In females, breeding movement activity was low and was not related to previous breeding success or to competition between females for territories. Natal philopatry was linked to apparent death of a mother; that is, we did not find evidence for mothers bequeathing territories for offspring, like observed in some other rodent species. Our results give an example of a species in which breeding movements are not driven by environmental variability or nest site quality. Different evolutionary forces often operate in natal and breeding movements, and our study supports the view that juveniles are responsible for redistributing individuals within and between populations. This emphasizes the importance of knowledge on natal dispersal, if we want to understand consequences of movement ecology of the species at the population level.
个体的一生活动决定了该物种的基因流动和入侵潜力。然而,扩散的性别依赖性以及驱动扩散的选择压力比不同生活和年龄阶段的扩散受到了更多关注。出生扩散比繁殖尝试之间的扩散更为常见,但繁殖扩散可能会受到资源可用性和竞争的促进。在这里,我们利用西伯利亚飞鼠巢箱种群的标记重捕数据来分析一生的扩散模式。出生扩散是指出生巢穴与次年使用的巢穴之间的距离,而繁殖活动则指繁殖尝试之间的巢穴位置变化。这里观察到的移动距离与早期无线电遥测研究报告的距离相当。繁殖活动对一生的扩散距离没有贡献,并且与食物丰度或栖息地斑块大小的变化无关。雄性的繁殖活动与雄性种群大小呈负相关,尽管相关性不强。在雌性中,繁殖活动较低,并且与先前的繁殖成功率或雌性之间对领地的竞争无关。出生留居与母亲的明显死亡有关;也就是说,我们没有发现像在其他一些啮齿动物物种中观察到的那样,母亲将领地遗赠给后代的证据。我们的研究结果给出了一个例子,说明一个物种的繁殖活动不是由环境变异性或巢穴质量驱动的。不同的进化力量通常在出生和繁殖活动中起作用,我们的研究支持这样一种观点,即幼体负责在种群内部和种群之间重新分配个体。如果我们想在种群水平上理解该物种移动生态学的后果,这就强调了了解出生扩散知识的重要性。