DeBoer Mark D, Valdez Rupa, Chernavvsky Daniel R, Grover Monica, Burt Solorzano Christine, Herbert Kirabo, Patek Stephen
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Jun;8(3):625-636. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0259-2. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of frequency and tone of parent-youth communication on glycemic control as measured by the Family Communication Inventory (FCI). Adolescence provides a unique set of diabetes management challenges, including suboptimal glycemic control. Continued parental involvement in diabetes management is associated with improved HbA1c outcomes; however, diabetes-related conflict within the family can have adverse effects. Although it is clear that communication plays an important role in diabetes outcomes, the specific impact of frequency and tone of such communication is largely understudied.
A total of 110 youths with type 1 diabetes and their parents completed questionnaires assessing diabetes-related adherence, family conflict, and family communication (i.e., frequency and tone) during a routine clinic visit. Routine testing of HbA1c was performed.
Youth- and parent-reported frequency of communication were unrelated to HbA1c. Instead, greater discrepancies between parents and children on reported frequency of communication (most commonly parents reporting frequent and youth reporting less frequent communication) corresponded with poorer glycemic control and increased family conflict. More positive tone of communication as rated by youth was associated with lower HbA1c.
Diabetes-related communication is more complex than conveyed simply by how often children and their parents communicate. Tone of communication and discrepancies in a family's perception of the frequency of communication were better than frequency as predictors of glycemic control. The FCI appears to capture the frequency and tone of diabetes-related communication, though larger-scale studies are warranted to inform future use of this scale.
本研究旨在评估亲子沟通的频率和语气对血糖控制的影响,血糖控制情况通过家庭沟通量表(FCI)进行衡量。青春期带来了一系列独特的糖尿病管理挑战,包括血糖控制欠佳。父母持续参与糖尿病管理与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平改善相关;然而,家庭内部与糖尿病相关的冲突可能产生不利影响。尽管很明显沟通在糖尿病治疗结果中起着重要作用,但此类沟通的频率和语气的具体影响在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。
共有110名1型糖尿病青少年及其父母在一次常规门诊就诊期间完成了问卷调查,评估与糖尿病相关的依从性、家庭冲突和家庭沟通(即频率和语气)。进行了HbA1c的常规检测。
青少年和父母报告的沟通频率与HbA1c无关。相反,父母与孩子在报告的沟通频率上差异越大(最常见的情况是父母报告沟通频繁而青少年报告沟通不频繁),血糖控制越差,家庭冲突也越多。青少年评定的更积极的沟通语气与较低的HbA1c相关。
与糖尿病相关的沟通比简单地通过孩子及其父母沟通的频率所传达的更为复杂。沟通语气以及家庭对沟通频率认知上的差异,比沟通频率更能预测血糖控制情况。FCI似乎能够捕捉与糖尿病相关沟通的频率和语气,不过需要开展更大规模的研究,以便为该量表的未来应用提供参考。