• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前吸烟者在肺癌筛查环境中对获取戒烟信息的偏好。

Current Smokers' Preferences for Receiving Cessation Information in a Lung Cancer Screening Setting.

作者信息

Carter-Harris Lisa, Schwindt Rhonda, Bakoyannis Giorgos, Ceppa DuyKhanh Pham, Rawl Susan M

机构信息

Indiana University School of Nursing, 600 Barnhill Drive, NU W427, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.

George Washington University School of Nursing, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2018 Oct;33(5):1120-1125. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1222-7.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-017-1222-7
PMID:28405898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5638665/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify current smokers' communication format preferences for receiving smoking cessation information in a lung cancer screening setting. A cross-sectional correlational design using survey methodology with 159 screening-eligible current smokers was the method used. Data was dichotomized (digital versus traditional preference) and analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression. Race was a statistically significant predictor with White participants having four times greater odds of reporting preference for a digital format for receiving smoking cessation information such as social media and/or supportive text messages (OR: 4.06; p = 0.004). Lung cancer screening is a new venue where current long-term smokers can be offered information about smoking cessation while they are engaging in a health-promoting behavior and potentially more likely to contemplate quitting. It is important to consider the communication format preference of current smokers to support cessation uptake. This study is the first to examine communication format preference of current smokers in the context of the lung cancer screening venue. Key differences noted by race support the need for further research examining multiple formats of communication with efforts to maximize options in the cancer screening setting.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定当前吸烟者在肺癌筛查环境中接收戒烟信息时对沟通形式的偏好。采用的方法是对159名符合筛查条件的当前吸烟者进行横断面相关设计,并使用调查方法。数据被二分法分类(数字形式与传统形式偏好),并使用Pearson卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和逻辑回归进行分析。种族是一个具有统计学意义的预测因素,白人参与者报告偏好数字形式(如社交媒体和/或支持性短信)接收戒烟信息的几率高出四倍(比值比:4.06;p = 0.004)。肺癌筛查是一个新的场所,在此可以为当前的长期吸烟者提供戒烟信息,此时他们正在参与促进健康的行为,并且可能更有可能考虑戒烟。考虑当前吸烟者的沟通形式偏好以支持戒烟接受度很重要。本研究是首次在肺癌筛查场所的背景下研究当前吸烟者的沟通形式偏好。种族方面的关键差异支持了进一步研究的必要性,即研究多种沟通形式,并努力在癌症筛查环境中最大化选择。

相似文献

1
Current Smokers' Preferences for Receiving Cessation Information in a Lung Cancer Screening Setting.当前吸烟者在肺癌筛查环境中对获取戒烟信息的偏好。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Oct;33(5):1120-1125. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1222-7.
2
Low Rates of Patient-Reported Physician-Patient Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening among Current Smokers: Data from Health Information National Trends Survey.当前吸烟者中患者报告的肺癌筛查医患讨论率较低:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 May;28(5):963-973. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0629.
3
A qualitative analysis of smokers' perceptions about lung cancer screening.吸烟者对肺癌筛查认知的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4496-0.
4
Smoking Cessation in the ITALUNG Lung Cancer Screening: What Does "Teachable Moment" Mean?ITALUNG 肺癌筛查中的戒烟:“可教时刻”意味着什么?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1484-1491. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz148.
5
Patient-Physician Discussions on Lung Cancer Screening: A Missed Teachable Moment to Promote Smoking Cessation.医患肺癌筛查讨论:促进戒烟的错失教学时机。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Mar 16;22(3):431-439. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty254.
6
Attending community-based lung cancer screening influences smoking behaviour in deprived populations.参加基于社区的肺癌筛查会影响贫困人群的吸烟行为。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Jan;139:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
Racial Differences in Tobacco Cessation and Treatment Usage After Lung Screening: An Examination of the National Lung Screening Trial.肺部筛查后戒烟及治疗使用情况的种族差异:对国家肺部筛查试验的一项研究
Oncologist. 2016 Jan;21(1):40-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0325. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Challenges to Educating Smokers About Lung Cancer Screening: a Qualitative Study of Decision Making Experiences in Primary Care.向吸烟者宣传肺癌筛查面临的挑战:一项关于初级保健中决策经历的定性研究
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1142-1149. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1420-y.
9
Are smokers less likely to seek preventive healthcare measures in Italy?在意大利,吸烟者寻求预防性医疗保健措施的可能性更低吗?
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Sep;27(5):507-513. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000357.
10
Tobacco use and motivation to stop smoking among long-term smokers who are ineligible for lung cancer screening.不符合肺癌筛查条件的长期吸烟者的烟草使用情况及戒烟动机。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;111:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Views on Medical Events in Lung Cancer Screening as Teachable Moments for Smoking Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.肺癌筛查中医疗事件作为吸烟行为改变可教时刻的患者观点:一项系统评价与综合分析
J Smok Cessat. 2023 Jun 3;2023:6647364. doi: 10.1155/2023/6647364. eCollection 2023.
2
Attitudes towards the integration of smoking cessation into lung cancer screening in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study of individuals eligible to attend.英国将戒烟纳入肺癌筛查的态度:一项针对有资格参加的个体的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1703-1716. doi: 10.1111/hex.13513. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.美国肺癌筛查中的种族和社会经济差异:系统评价。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery.利用社交媒体进行健康研究:招募和干预实施的方法学与伦理学考量
Digit Health. 2018 May 7;4:2055207618771757. doi: 10.1177/2055207618771757. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoking cessation results in a clinical lung cancer screening program.戒烟会促成一项临床肺癌筛查计划。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(Suppl 6):S481-7. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.11.
2
Smoking cessation interventions within the context of Low-Dose Computed Tomography lung cancer screening: A systematic review.低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查背景下的戒烟干预措施:一项系统评价
Lung Cancer. 2016 Aug;98:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.028. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
3
Beyond Traditional Newspaper Advertisement: Leveraging Facebook-Targeted Advertisement to Recruit Long-Term Smokers for Research.超越传统报纸广告:利用脸书定向广告招募长期吸烟者参与研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 15;18(6):e117. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5502.
4
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales.肺癌筛查健康信念量表的编制与心理测量学评估
Cancer Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;40(3):237-244. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000386.
5
Preferences for the Provision of Smoking Cessation Education Among Cancer Patients.癌症患者对戒烟教育提供方式的偏好。
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):7-11. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1035-0.
6
Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于手机的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 10;4(4):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
7
Randomised controlled trial evaluation of Tweet2Quit: a social network quit-smoking intervention.Tweet2Quit的随机对照试验评估:一种社交网络戒烟干预措施
Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(2):188-194. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052768. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Pairing smoking-cessation services with lung cancer screening: A clinical guideline from the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.将戒烟服务与肺癌筛查相结合:来自烟草使用与依赖治疗协会和尼古丁与烟草研究协会的临床指南。
Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1150-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29926. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
Incorporating a Smoking Cessation Intervention into Lung Cancer Screening Programs: Preliminary Studies.将戒烟干预措施纳入肺癌筛查项目:初步研究
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(6):703-23. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2015.1082171.
10
Primary Care Provider-Delivered Smoking Cessation Interventions and Smoking Cessation Among Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.初级保健提供者实施的戒烟干预措施与国家肺癌筛查试验参与者的戒烟情况
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1509-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2391.