• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健提供者在跨专业查房期间目标的案例研究。

A case study of healthcare providers' goals during interprofessional rounds.

作者信息

Prystajecky Michael, Lee Tiffany, Abonyi Sylvia, Perry Robert, Ward Heather

机构信息

a Department of Medicine , University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon , Saskatchewan , Canada.

b Department of Community Health and Epidemiology , University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon , Saskatchewan , Canada.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):463-469. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1306497. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1080/13561820.2017.1306497
PMID:28406339
Abstract

Daily interprofessional rounds enhance collaboration among healthcare providers and improve hospital performance measures. However, it is unclear how healthcare providers' goals influence the processes and outcomes of interprofessional rounds. The purpose of this case study was to explore the goals of healthcare providers attending interprofessional rounds in an internal medicine ward. The second purpose was to explore the challenges encountered by healthcare providers while pursuing these goals. Three focus groups were held with healthcare providers of diverse professional backgrounds. Focus group field notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. The data indicated that there was no consensus among healthcare providers regarding the goals of interprofessional rounds. Discharge planning and patient care delivery were perceived as competing priorities during rounds, which limited the participation of healthcare providers. Nevertheless, study participants identified goals of rounds that were relevant to most care providers: developing shared perspectives of patients through direct communication, promoting collaborative decision making, coordinating care, and strengthening interprofessional relationships. Challenges in achieving the goals of interprofessional rounds included inconsistent attendance, exchange of irrelevant information, variable participation by healthcare providers, and inconsistent leadership. The findings of this study underscore the importance of shared goals in the context of interprofessional rounding.

摘要

每日跨专业查房可加强医疗服务提供者之间的协作,并改善医院绩效指标。然而,尚不清楚医疗服务提供者的目标如何影响跨专业查房的过程和结果。本案例研究的目的是探讨在内科病房参加跨专业查房的医疗服务提供者的目标。第二个目的是探讨医疗服务提供者在追求这些目标时遇到的挑战。与不同专业背景的医疗服务提供者举行了三次焦点小组讨论。使用主题分析法对焦点小组的现场记录和文字记录进行了分析。数据表明,医疗服务提供者在跨专业查房的目标上没有达成共识。出院计划和患者护理被视为查房期间相互竞争的优先事项,这限制了医疗服务提供者的参与。尽管如此,研究参与者确定了与大多数护理提供者相关的查房目标:通过直接沟通形成对患者的共同看法、促进协作决策、协调护理以及加强跨专业关系。实现跨专业查房目标面临的挑战包括出勤不一致、交流不相关信息、医疗服务提供者参与程度不一以及领导不一致。本研究结果强调了在跨专业查房背景下共享目标的重要性。

相似文献

1
A case study of healthcare providers' goals during interprofessional rounds.医疗保健提供者在跨专业查房期间目标的案例研究。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jul;31(4):463-469. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1306497. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Exploring challenges in the patient's discharge process from the internal medicine service: A qualitative study of patients' and providers' perceptions.探索内科服务中患者出院流程的挑战:一项关于患者和医护人员看法的定性研究
J Interprof Care. 2017 Sep;31(5):566-574. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1322562. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
3
Bedside interprofessional rounds: perceptions of benefits and barriers by internal medicine nursing staff, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians.床边跨专业查房:内科护理人员、主治医生和住院医生对其益处和障碍的看法
J Hosp Med. 2014 Oct;9(10):646-51. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2245. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
Interprofessional practice: learning how to collaborate.跨专业实践:学习如何协作。
Contemp Nurse. 2005 Sep;20(1):28-37. doi: 10.5172/conu.20.1.28.
5
Interprofessional rhetoric and operational realities: an ethnographic study of rounds in four intensive care units.跨专业的言辞与操作现实:对四个重症监护病房查房的人种志研究
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):735-48. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9662-5. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
6
Exploring interdisciplinary teamwork to support effective ward rounds.探索跨学科团队合作以支持有效的病房查房。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020 Jul 14;33(4-5):373-387. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2019-0178.
7
The Care Team Visit: Approaching Interdisciplinary Rounds With Renewed Focus.护理团队查房:以新的重点开展多学科会诊
J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Apr/Jun;33(2):135-142. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000279.
8
Improving attending rounds: Qualitative reflections from multidisciplinary providers.改进主治医师查房:多学科医护人员的质性反思
Hosp Pract (1995). 2015;43(3):186-90. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2015.1043181. Epub 2015 May 4.
9
Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.精神卫生保健中的共同决策和跨专业合作:探索障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep;27(5):373-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.785503. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Perspective: a business school view of medical interprofessional rounds: transforming rounding groups into rounding teams.观点:商学院视角下的医疗跨专业查房:将查房小组转变为查房团队。
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1768-71. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318271f8da.

引用本文的文献

1
Rounds Redesign: Our Experience In Splitting Interdisciplinary Rounds.查房重新设计:我们在拆分跨学科查房方面的经验
J Brown Hosp Med. 2024 Apr 1;3(2):115837. doi: 10.56305/001c.115837. eCollection 2024.
2
Conducting a good ward round: How do leaders do it?做好病房查房:领导者该怎么做?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;28(3):411-420. doi: 10.1111/jep.13670. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
3
Who is Responsible for Discharge Education of Patients? A Multi-Institutional Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.谁负责患者的出院教育?一项针对内科住院医师的多机构调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06508-4. Epub 2021 Feb 2.