• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速思考会增加风险决策中的框架效应。

Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.

机构信息

1 Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine.

2 Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):530-543. doi: 10.1177/0956797616689092. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1177/0956797616689092
PMID:28406376
Abstract

Every day, people face snap decisions when time is a limiting factor. In addition, the way a problem is presented can influence people's choices, which creates what are known as framing effects. In this research, we explored how time pressure interacts with framing effects in risky decision making. Specifically, does time pressure strengthen or weaken framing effects? On one hand, research has suggested that framing effects evolve through the deliberation process, growing larger with time. On the other hand, dual-process theory attributes framing effects to an intuitive, emotional system that responds automatically to stimuli. In our experiments, participants made decisions about gambles framed in terms of either gains or losses, and time pressure was manipulated across blocks. Results showed increased framing effects under time pressure in both hypothetical and incentivized choices, which supports the dual-process hypothesis that these effects arise from a fast, intuitive system.

摘要

每天,人们在时间有限的情况下都要做出即时决策。此外,问题呈现的方式也会影响人们的选择,从而产生所谓的框架效应。在这项研究中,我们探讨了时间压力如何与风险决策中的框架效应相互作用。具体来说,时间压力是会增强还是削弱框架效应?一方面,研究表明框架效应是通过深思熟虑的过程发展起来的,随着时间的推移会变得更大。另一方面,双重加工理论将框架效应归因于一个直观的、情绪化的系统,它会对刺激自动做出反应。在我们的实验中,参与者根据收益或损失来做出赌博决策,并且在不同的区块中操纵时间压力。结果表明,在假设和激励选择下,时间压力下的框架效应都有所增加,这支持了双重加工理论,即这些效应源于一个快速的、直观的系统。

相似文献

1
Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.快速思考会增加风险决策中的框架效应。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):530-543. doi: 10.1177/0956797616689092. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
2
Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.框架效应与风险敏感决策。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder.背景对强迫症中冒险行为和决策时间的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Apr;75:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
The order of information processing alters economic gain-loss framing effects.信息处理的顺序会改变经济得失框架效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
Working memory loads differentially influence frame-induced bias and normative choice in risky decision making.工作记忆负荷对风险决策中的框架诱导偏差和规范选择有差异影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214571. eCollection 2019.
6
Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making.年龄、损失最小化和概率在决策中的作用。
Gerontology. 2018;64(5):475-484. doi: 10.1159/000487636. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
7
Beyond gains and losses: the effect of need on risky choice in framed decisions.超越得失:框架决策中需求对风险选择的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1136-47. doi: 10.1037/a0027855. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
8
Neurobiological and memory models of risky decision making in adolescents versus young adults.青少年与年轻成年人冒险决策的神经生物学和记忆模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1125-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023943.
9
Is the framing effect a framing affect?框架效应是一种框架影响吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jun;72(6):1412-1421. doi: 10.1177/1747021818796016. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
10
The foreign-language effect: thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases.外语效应:用外语思考能减少决策偏见。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):661-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797611432178. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Choosing the right frame: how context preferences facilitate subsequent decisions.选择正确的框架:情境偏好如何促进后续决策。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79510-z.
2
Time pressure effects on decision-making in intertemporal loss scenarios: an eye-tracking study.时间压力对跨期损失情景下决策的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1451674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451674. eCollection 2024.
3
Cognitive Correlates of Risky Decision-Making in Individuals with and without ADHD: A Meta-analysis.
注意缺陷多动障碍患者与非患者风险决策的认知关联:一项荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09646-2.
4
Individual differences moderate effects in an Unusual Disease paradigm: A psychophysical data collection lab approach and an online experiment.个体差异在一种罕见疾病范式中调节效应:一种心理物理学数据收集实验室方法和一项在线实验。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 28;14:1086699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1086699. eCollection 2023.
5
Non-parametric mixture modeling of cognitive psychological data: A new method to disentangle hidden strategies.认知心理数据的非参数混合建模:一种分离隐藏策略的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2232-2248. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01837-0. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis.基于情境的行为干预的计算机制:大规模分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2114914119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114914119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.保持预算一致!研究关于亏损的风险决策的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265822. eCollection 2022.
8
How Cues of Being Watched Promote Risk Seeking in Fund Investment in Older Adults.被注视的线索如何促进老年人基金投资中的风险寻求行为。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 12;12:765632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.765632. eCollection 2021.
9
Time to Pay Attention? Information Search Explains Amplified Framing Effects Under Time Pressure.是时候引起重视了?信息搜索解释了时间压力下框架效应的放大。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;33(1):90-104. doi: 10.1177/09567976211026983. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Investigating the origin and consequences of endogenous default options in repeated economic choices.研究重复经济选择中内源性默认选项的起源和后果。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0232385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232385. eCollection 2020.