Suppr超能文献

依赖培养的计数方法无法同时检测饮用水中受消毒剂损伤的和转基因的大肠杆菌。

Culture-dependent enumeration methods failed to simultaneously detect disinfectant-injured and genetically modified Escherichia coli in drinking water.

作者信息

Li Jing, Liu Lu, Yang Dong, Liu Wei-Li, Shen Zhi-Qiang, Qu Hong-Mei, Qiu Zhi-Gang, Hou Ai-Ming, Wang Da-Ning, Ding Chen-Shi, Li Jun-Wen, Guo Jian-Hua, Jin Min

机构信息

Department of Environment and Health, Tianjin Institute of Health and Environmental Medicine, Key Laboratory of Risk Assessment and Control for Environment & Food Safety, Tianjin 300050, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017 May 24;19(5):720-726. doi: 10.1039/c6em00625f.

Abstract

Underestimation of Escherichia coli in drinking water, an indicator microorganism of sanitary risk, may result in potential risks of waterborne diseases. However, the detection of disinfectant-injured or genetically modified (GM) E. coli has been largely overlooked so far. To evaluate the accuracy of culture-dependent enumeration with regard to disinfectant-injured and GM E. coli, chlorine- or ozone-injured wild-type (WT) and GM E. coli were prepared and characterized. Then, water samples contaminated with these E. coli strains were assayed by four widely used methods, including lactose tryptose broth-based multiple-tube fermentation (MTF), m-endo-based membrane filtration method (MFM), an enzyme substrate test (EST) known as Colilert, and Petrifilm-based testing slip method (TSM). It was found that MTF was the most effective method to detect disinfectant-injured WT E. coli (with 76.9% trials detecting all these bacteria), while this method could not effectively detect GM E. coli (with uninjured bacteria undetectable and a maximal detection rate of 21.5% for the injured). The EST was the only method which enabled considerable enumeration of uninjured GM E. coli, with a detection rate of over 93%. However, the detection rate declined to lower than 45.4% once the GM E. coli was injured by disinfectants. The MFM was invalid for both disinfectant-injured and GM E. coli. This is the first study to report the failure of these commonly used enumeration methods to simultaneously detect disinfectant-injured and GM E. coli. Thus, it highlights the urgent requirement for the development of a more accurate and versatile enumeration method which allows the detection of disinfectant-injured and GM E. coli on the assessment of microbial quality of drinking water.

摘要

大肠杆菌作为卫生风险的指示微生物,在饮用水中的数量被低估可能会导致水源性疾病的潜在风险。然而,到目前为止,消毒剂损伤或转基因大肠杆菌的检测在很大程度上被忽视了。为了评估基于培养法计数对于消毒剂损伤和转基因大肠杆菌的准确性,制备并表征了经氯或臭氧损伤的野生型和转基因大肠杆菌。然后,用四种广泛使用的方法对被这些大肠杆菌菌株污染的水样进行检测,包括基于乳糖胰蛋白胨肉汤的多管发酵法(MTF)、基于m-远藤氏培养基的膜过滤法(MFM)、一种名为Colilert的酶底物试验(EST)以及基于Petrifilm的测试片法(TSM)。结果发现,MTF是检测消毒剂损伤的野生型大肠杆菌最有效的方法(76.9%的试验能检测到所有这些细菌),而该方法不能有效检测转基因大肠杆菌(未损伤的细菌无法检测到,损伤的细菌最大检测率为21.5%)。EST是唯一能够对未损伤的转基因大肠杆菌进行大量计数的方法,检测率超过93%。然而,一旦转基因大肠杆菌受到消毒剂损伤,其检测率就会降至低于45.4%。MFM对消毒剂损伤的大肠杆菌和转基因大肠杆菌均无效。这是第一项报道这些常用计数方法无法同时检测消毒剂损伤的大肠杆菌和转基因大肠杆菌的研究。因此,这凸显了迫切需要开发一种更准确、更通用的计数方法,以便在评估饮用水微生物质量时能够检测出消毒剂损伤的大肠杆菌和转基因大肠杆菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验