• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猿类和人亚科原人髂骨下部的进化

Lower Ilium Evolution in Apes and Hominins.

作者信息

Hammond Ashley S, Almécija Sergio

机构信息

Center for Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, 20052.

Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 May;300(5):828-844. doi: 10.1002/ar.23545.

DOI:10.1002/ar.23545
PMID:28406561
Abstract

Elucidating the pelvic morphology of the Pan-Homo last common ancestor (LCA) is crucial for understanding ape and human evolution. The pelvis of Ardipithecus ramidus has been the basis of controversial interpretations of the LCA pelvis. In particular, it was proposed that the lower ilium became elongate independently in the orangutan and chimpanzee clades, making these taxa poor analogues for the pelvis of the LCA. This study examines the variation in relative lower ilium height between and within living and fossil hominoid species (and other anthropoids), and models its evolution using available fossil hominoids as calibration points. We find nuanced differences in relative lower ilium height among living hominoids, particularly in regards to gorillas, which do not have elongate lower ilia (because they are likely to represent the plesiomorphic hominoid condition for this trait). We also show that differences in relative lower ilium height among hominoid taxa are not readily explained by differences in size between species. Our maximum likelihood ancestral state reconstructions support inferences that chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes in particular) and orangutans evolved their elongate lower ilia independently. We also find that the predicted lower ilium height of the Pan-Homo LCA is shorter than all great apes except gorillas. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that finds different regions of the body show different evolutionary histories in different hominoids, and underscores that the unique combinations of morphologies of each modern and fossil hominoid species should be considered when reconstructing the mosaic nature of the Pan-Homo LCA. Anat Rec, 300:828-844, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

阐明泛人科最后一个共同祖先(LCA)的骨盆形态对于理解猿类和人类的进化至关重要。拉密达地猿的骨盆一直是对LCA骨盆有争议解释的基础。特别是,有人提出,在猩猩和黑猩猩分支中,髂骨下部独立变长,使得这些类群不太适合作为LCA骨盆的类似物。本研究考察了现存和化石类人猿物种(以及其他灵长类动物)之间以及内部相对髂骨下部高度的差异,并以现有的化石类人猿作为校准点对其进化进行建模。我们发现现存类人猿在相对髂骨下部高度上存在细微差异,特别是大猩猩,它们的髂骨下部没有变长(因为它们可能代表了该性状的原始类人猿状态)。我们还表明,类人猿分类群之间相对髂骨下部高度的差异不能简单地用物种间大小差异来解释。我们的最大似然祖先状态重建支持了这样的推断,即黑猩猩(特别是普通黑猩猩)和猩猩独立进化出了变长的髂骨下部。我们还发现,泛人科LCA预测的髂骨下部高度比除大猩猩之外的所有大猩猩都短。这项研究增加了越来越多的证据,这些证据表明身体的不同区域在不同类人猿中显示出不同的进化历史,并强调在重建泛人科LCA的镶嵌性质时,应考虑每个现代和化石类人猿物种独特的形态组合。《解剖学记录》,300:828 - 844,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司。

相似文献

1
Lower Ilium Evolution in Apes and Hominins.猿类和人亚科原人髂骨下部的进化
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017 May;300(5):828-844. doi: 10.1002/ar.23545.
2
The evolution of human and ape hand proportions.人类与猿类手部比例的演变。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 14;6:7717. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8717.
3
A late Miocene hominid partial pelvis from Hungary.来自匈牙利的中新世晚期人科部分骨盆。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Nov;136:102645. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102645. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
4
Fossil hominin shoulders support an African ape-like last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees.古人类肩部化石支持人类和黑猩猩的最后一个共同祖先类似非洲猿的观点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11829-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511220112. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
5
Scapular shape of extant hominoids and the African ape/modern human last common ancestor.现存类人猿的肩胛骨形状与非洲猿/现代人类的最近共同祖先。
J Hum Evol. 2016 May;94:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Multivariate analysis of early hominid pelvic bones.早期原始人类骨盆骨的多变量分析
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 Sep;43(2):263-70. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330430212.
7
The evolution of vertebral formulae in Hominoidea.人猿总科中椎体公式的演变。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Sep;110:18-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
8
Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes.有证据表明存在一种体型如黑猩猩的人类祖先,但却是一种体型如长臂猿的猿类祖先。
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 12;8(1):880. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00997-4.
9
Gorilla-like anatomy on Australopithecus afarensis mandibles suggests Au. afarensis link to robust australopiths.阿法南方古猿下颌骨上类似大猩猩的解剖结构表明阿法南方古猿与粗壮南方古猿存在联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 17;104(16):6568-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606454104. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
10
The great divides: Ardipithecus ramidus reveals the postcrania of our last common ancestors with African apes.重大分歧:拉密达地猿揭示了我们与非洲猿类的最后共同祖先的颅后骨骼特征。
Science. 2009 Oct 2;326(5949):100-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The developmental impacts of natural selection on human pelvic morphology.自然选择对人类骨盆形态发育的影响。
Sci Adv. 2022 Aug 19;8(33):eabq4884. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq4884. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Perspectives of lifespan extension: focus on external or internal resources?寿命延长的视角:关注外部还是内部资源?
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 27;12(6):5566-5584. doi: 10.18632/aging.102981.
3
The effects of phylogeny, body size, and locomotor behavior on the three-dimensional shape of the pelvis in extant carnivorans.系统发育、体型和运动行为对现存食肉动物骨盆三维形状的影响。
PeerJ. 2020 Feb 20;8:e8574. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8574. eCollection 2020.
4
Insights into the lower torso in late Miocene hominoid .对中新世晚期人科动物下半身的深入了解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 7;117(1):278-284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911896116. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
The hominid ilium is shaped by a synapomorphic growth mechanism that is unique within primates.人类的髋骨由一种独特于灵长类动物的同源异形生长机制塑造。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):13915-13920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905242116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Three-dimensional kinematics and the origin of the hominin walking stride.人类行走步态的三维运动学和起源。
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Aug;15(145). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0205.