• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会对选择行为的影响:区分局部驱动和全局驱动的优先连接

Social influence on selection behaviour: Distinguishing local- and global-driven preferential attachment.

作者信息

Pan Xue, Hou Lei, Liu Kecheng

机构信息

Informatics Research Centre, Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UD, United Kingdom.

Data Science and Cloud Service Research Centre, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0175761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175761. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175761
PMID:28406984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5391099/
Abstract

Social influence drives human selection behaviours when numerous objects competing for limited attentions, which leads to the 'rich get richer' dynamics where popular objects tend to get more attentions. However, evidences have been found that, both the global information of the whole system and the local information among one's friends have significant influence over the one's selection. Consequently, a key question raises that, it is the local information or the global information more determinative for one's selection? Here we compare the local-based influence and global-based influence. We show that, the selection behaviour is mainly driven by the local popularity of the objects while the global popularity plays a supplementary role driving the behaviour only when there is little local information for the user to refer to. Thereby, we propose a network model to describe the mechanism of user-object interaction evolution with social influence, where the users perform either local-driven or global-driven preferential attachments to the objects, i.e., the probability of an objects to be selected by a target user is proportional to either its local popularity or global popularity. The simulation suggests that, about 75% of the attachments should be driven by the local popularity to reproduce the empirical observations. It means that, at least in the studied context where users chose businesses on Yelp, there is a probability of 75% for a user to make a selection according to the local popularity. The proposed model and the numerical findings may shed some light on the study of social influence and evolving social systems.

摘要

当众多对象争夺有限的注意力时,社会影响会驱动人类的选择行为,这会导致“富者愈富”的动态变化,即受欢迎的对象往往会获得更多关注。然而,已经发现证据表明,整个系统的全局信息以及一个人朋友之间的局部信息对这个人的选择都有重大影响。因此,一个关键问题出现了,即对于一个人的选择而言,是局部信息还是全局信息更具决定性?在这里,我们比较基于局部的影响和基于全局的影响。我们表明,选择行为主要由对象的局部受欢迎程度驱动,而全局受欢迎程度仅在用户几乎没有局部信息可参考时才起到补充作用来驱动行为。由此,我们提出一个网络模型来描述具有社会影响的用户 - 对象交互演化机制,其中用户对对象执行局部驱动或全局驱动的优先连接,即目标用户选择某个对象的概率与其局部受欢迎程度或全局受欢迎程度成正比。模拟结果表明,大约75%的连接应由局部受欢迎程度驱动,以重现实证观察结果。这意味着,至少在所研究的用户在Yelp上选择商家的背景下,用户有75%的概率根据局部受欢迎程度进行选择。所提出的模型和数值结果可能会为社会影响和不断演化的社会系统的研究提供一些启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/2dbe9d6d50ec/pone.0175761.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/6fb6d95b5b55/pone.0175761.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/ce6117472144/pone.0175761.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/2dbe9d6d50ec/pone.0175761.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/6fb6d95b5b55/pone.0175761.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/ce6117472144/pone.0175761.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3932/5391099/2dbe9d6d50ec/pone.0175761.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Social influence on selection behaviour: Distinguishing local- and global-driven preferential attachment.社会对选择行为的影响:区分局部驱动和全局驱动的优先连接
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0175761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175761. eCollection 2017.
2
Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of activity and popularity.刻画并模拟活动及人气的动态变化。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089192. eCollection 2014.
3
User recommendation in healthcare social media by assessing user similarity in heterogeneous network.基于异构网络中用户相似性评估的医疗保健社交媒体中的用户推荐。
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Sep;81:63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
4
Quantitative agent based model of user behavior in an Internet discussion forum.基于主体的互联网讨论论坛用户行为量化模型。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 4;8(12):e80524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080524. eCollection 2013.
5
Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender.青少年攻击行为、亲社会行为和社会地位的友谊动态:性别调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Nov;46(11):2305-2320. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Building a Social Network One Choice at a Time.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0133463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133463. eCollection 2015.
7
Emergence of scale-free leadership structure in social recommender systems.社会推荐系统中无标度领导结构的出现。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e20648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020648. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
8
Competition-induced criticality in a model of meme popularity.竞争导致模因流行度的临界点。
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Jan 31;112(4):048701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.048701. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Investigation of user behavior on social networking sites.社交网站上用户行为的调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0169693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169693. eCollection 2017.
10
An on demand data integration model for biological databases.一种用于生物数据库的按需数据集成模型。
Int J Data Min Bioinform. 2009;3(1):40-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergent scale-free networks.涌现的无标度网络。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 14;3(7):pgae236. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae236. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Stability of similarity measurements for bipartite networks.二分网络相似性度量的稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 4;6:18653. doi: 10.1038/srep18653.
2
Identifying the Role of Common Interests in Online User Trust Formation.识别共同兴趣在网络用户信任形成中的作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0121105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121105. eCollection 2015.
3
Memory effect of the online user preference.在线用户偏好的记忆效应
Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 13;4:6560. doi: 10.1038/srep06560.
4
Social influence bias: a randomized experiment.社会影响偏差:一项随机实验。
Science. 2013 Aug 9;341(6146):647-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1240466.
5
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.一项涉及 6100 万人的社会影响和政治动员实验。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11421.
6
Popularity versus similarity in growing networks.在不断发展的网络中,受欢迎程度和相似度。
Nature. 2012 Sep 27;489(7417):537-40. doi: 10.1038/nature11459. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
7
Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.社会传染理论:探究动态社会网络和人类行为。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):556-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5408. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
Social selection and peer influence in an online social network.社会选择和在线社交网络中的同辈影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):68-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109739109. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
9
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.社会影响如何破坏群体智慧效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 31;108(22):9020-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008636108. Epub 2011 May 16.
10
Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of online popularity.刻画和建模在线流行度的动态变化。
Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Oct 8;105(15):158701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.158701.