• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项涉及 6100 万人的社会影响和政治动员实验。

A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.

机构信息

Political Science Department, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.

出版信息

Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11421.

DOI:10.1038/nature11421
PMID:22972300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3834737/
Abstract

Human behaviour is thought to spread through face-to-face social networks, but it is difficult to identify social influence effects in observational studies, and it is unknown whether online social networks operate in the same way. Here we report results from a randomized controlled trial of political mobilization messages delivered to 61 million Facebook users during the 2010 US congressional elections. The results show that the messages directly influenced political self-expression, information seeking and real-world voting behaviour of millions of people. Furthermore, the messages not only influenced the users who received them but also the users' friends, and friends of friends. The effect of social transmission on real-world voting was greater than the direct effect of the messages themselves, and nearly all the transmission occurred between 'close friends' who were more likely to have a face-to-face relationship. These results suggest that strong ties are instrumental for spreading both online and real-world behaviour in human social networks.

摘要

人们认为,人类行为是通过面对面的社交网络传播的,但在观察性研究中很难识别社交影响效应,也不知道在线社交网络是否以同样的方式运作。在这里,我们报告了在 2010 年美国国会选举期间向 6100 万 Facebook 用户发送政治动员信息的随机对照试验结果。结果表明,这些信息直接影响了数百万人的政治自我表达、信息搜索和现实世界的投票行为。此外,这些信息不仅影响了收到信息的用户,还影响了他们的朋友以及朋友的朋友。社会传播对现实世界投票的影响大于信息本身的直接影响,而且几乎所有的传播都发生在“亲密朋友”之间,这些朋友更有可能存在面对面的关系。这些结果表明,在人类社交网络中,强关系对于传播在线和现实世界的行为都很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c27/3834737/006af3e37a48/nihms524815f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c27/3834737/32955cf924aa/nihms524815f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c27/3834737/006af3e37a48/nihms524815f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c27/3834737/32955cf924aa/nihms524815f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c27/3834737/006af3e37a48/nihms524815f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization.一项涉及 6100 万人的社会影响和政治动员实验。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-8. doi: 10.1038/nature11421.
2
Social influence and political mobilization: Further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election.社会影响与政治动员:来自2012年美国总统大选一项随机试验的进一步证据
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0173851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173851. eCollection 2017.
3
Inferring tie strength from online directed behavior.从在线有向行为推断关系强度。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052168. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
4
Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.2015年哥伦比亚选举中的意识形态消费主义:政治意识形态、推特活动与选举结果之间的联系
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):37-43. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.
5
Do Online Voting Patterns Reflect Evolved Features of Human Cognition? An Exploratory Empirical Investigation.网络投票模式是否反映了人类认知的进化特征?一项探索性实证研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0129703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129703. eCollection 2015.
6
Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement.依赖 Facebook 获取新闻及其对政治参与的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0212263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212263. eCollection 2019.
7
Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks.交友、即时通讯和面对面交往:青少年线上和线下社交网络的重叠。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):356-68. doi: 10.1037/a0026980.
8
Social science: Poked to vote.社会科学:被催促投票。
Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):212-4. doi: 10.1038/489212a.
9
Face to (face)book: the two faces of social behavior?直面社交行为的两面性:脸书社交的利与弊
J Pers. 2013 Jun;81(3):290-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00804.x. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Health-Seeking Influence Reflected by Online Health-Related Messages Received on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Survey.社交媒体上收到的与健康相关的在线信息所反映的求健康影响:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 16;19(11):e382. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5989.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomy of a Swedish population-scale network.瑞典人口规模网络剖析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15966-x.
2
"Don't you plan on voting?" The motives and effects of peer pressure in voter mobilization.“你不打算投票吗?”同伴压力在选民动员中的动机与影响。
Quart J Polit Sci. 2025;20(2):231-268. doi: 10.1561/100.00024022. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
3
Divisive negative discourse biases social experience: a live experiment at a massive public event.分裂性负面话语会使社会体验产生偏差:一项在大型公共活动中的现场实验。

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.识别社交网络中的有影响力和易感染成员。
Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):337-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
2
Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior.社会传染理论:探究动态社会网络和人类行为。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):556-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.5408. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
3
The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.通过在线网络进行抗议招募的动态。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1273. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05652-8. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
4
Perceived community alignment increases information sharing.感知到的社区一致性会增加信息共享。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):5864. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59915-8.
5
Social Predictors of Hearing Aid Purchase: Do Stigma, Social Network Composition, Social Support, and Loneliness Matter?助听器购买的社会预测因素:耻辱感、社交网络构成、社会支持和孤独感重要吗?
Ear Hear. 2025;46(5):1149-1163. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001656. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
6
The role of social media ads for election outcomes: Evidence from the 2021 German election.社交媒体广告对选举结果的作用:来自2021年德国选举的证据。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Mar 5;4(3):pgaf073. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf073. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
A research agenda for encouraging prosocial behaviour on social media.一份关于鼓励社交媒体上亲社会行为的研究议程。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):441-449. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02102-y. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
8
Conversational linguistic features inform social-relational inference.对话语言特征为社会关系推理提供信息。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02654-0.
9
Networks of Negativity: Gaining Attention Through Cyberbullying.消极网络:通过网络欺凌获得关注。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;21(12):1699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121699.
10
Studying factual versus social cues as triggers of change in food behaviour.研究事实性线索与社会性线索作为食物行为改变的触发因素。
J Nutr Sci. 2024 Dec 3;13:e88. doi: 10.1017/jns.2024.82. eCollection 2024.
Sci Rep. 2011;1:197. doi: 10.1038/srep00197. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers.社交网络与狩猎采集者的合作
Nature. 2012 Jan 25;481(7382):497-501. doi: 10.1038/nature10736.
5
An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior.同群现象在健康行为采用中的实验研究。
Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1269-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1207055.
6
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.通过唤起自我来激发选民投票率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12653-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103343108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.在线系统中社会影响的自发涌现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18375-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914572107. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
8
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.在线社交网络实验中的行为传播。
Science. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1194-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1185231.
9
It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election.《Facebook 用户在 2008 年选举中的政治参与:情况复杂》
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Mar;14(3):107-14. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0226. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
10
Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks.人类社交网络中的合作行为级联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 23;107(12):5334-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913149107. Epub 2010 Mar 8.