Suppr超能文献

通过重新分析“改善循环复苏护理”试验观察轻度治疗性低温的生存获益。

Observed survival benefit of mild therapeutic hypothermia reanalysing the Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care trial.

作者信息

Nürnberger Alexander, Herkner Harald, Sterz Fritz, Olsen Jan-Aage, Lozano Michael, van Grunsven Pierre M, Lerner E Brooke, Persse David, Malzer Reinhard, Brouwer Marc A, Westfall Mark, Souders Chris M, Travis David T, Herken Ulrich R, Wik Lars

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.

Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Prehospital Emergency Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Jun;47(6):439-446. doi: 10.1111/eci.12759. Epub 2017 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild therapeutic hypothermia is argued being beneficial for outcome after cardiac arrest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of Circulation Improving Resuscitation Care (CIRC) trial data to assess if therapeutic cooling to 33 ± 1 °C core temperature had an association with survival. Of 4231 adult, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac origin initially enrolled, eligibility criteria for therapeutic hypothermia were met by 1812. Logistic regression was undertaken in a stepwise fashion to account for the impact on outcome of each significant difference and for the variable of interest between the groups.

RESULTS

Out-of- and in-hospital cooled were 263 (15%), only after admission cooled were 230 (13%) and not cooled were 357 (20%) patients. The group cooled out of- and in hospital had 98 (37%) survivors as compared to the groups cooled in hospital only [80 (35%)] and of those not cooled [68 (19%)]. After adjusting for known covariates (sex, age, witnessed cardiac arrest, no- and low-flow time, shockable initial rhythm, random allocation, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and percutaneous coronary intervention), the odds ratio for survival comparing no cooling to out-of- plus in-hospital cooling was 0·53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0·46-0·61, P < 0·001], and comparing to in-hospital cooling only was 0·67 (95% CI: 0·50-0·89, P = 0·006).

CONCLUSION

Mild therapeutic hypothermia initiated out of hospital and/or in hospital was associated with improved survival within this secondary analysis of the CIRC cohort compared to no therapeutic hypothermia.

摘要

背景

轻度治疗性低温被认为对心脏骤停后的预后有益。

材料与方法

对循环改善复苏护理(CIRC)试验数据进行回顾性分析,以评估将核心体温降至33±1°C的治疗性降温是否与生存率相关。在最初纳入的4231例推测为心源性的院外成人心脏骤停患者中,1812例符合治疗性低温的纳入标准。采用逐步逻辑回归分析,以考虑每组显著差异对预后的影响以及组间感兴趣的变量。

结果

院外和院内降温的患者有263例(15%),仅入院后降温的患者有230例(13%),未降温的患者有357例(20%)。院外和院内降温组有98例(37%)幸存者,而仅院内降温组有80例(35%)幸存者,未降温组有68例(19%)幸存者。在调整已知协变量(性别、年龄、目击心脏骤停、无血流和低血流时间、可电击的初始心律、随机分组、旁观者心肺复苏和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)后,未降温与院外加院内降温相比的生存优势比为0.53[95%置信区间(CI):0.46 - 0.61,P < 0.001],与仅院内降温相比为0.67(95%CI:0.50 - 0.89,P = 0.006)。

结论

在对CIRC队列的这项二次分析中,与未进行治疗性低温相比,院外和/或院内开始的轻度治疗性低温与生存率提高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb9b/5488218/b1bd1dce16f5/ECI-47-439-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验