• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探寻新生儿血斑筛查项目中信息提供的偏好

Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs.

作者信息

Wright Stuart J, Ulph Fiona, Dharni Nimarta, Payne Katherine

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007
PMID:28408008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The national newborn bloodspot screening programs (NBSPs) are continually expanding to screen for more conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify parents' preferences for information and the way in which this is provided in example NBSPs.

METHODS

A hybrid choice experiment, combining a conjoint analysis and a discrete choice experiment, was designed. A sample of current and future parents between the ages of 18 and 45 years was identified via an Internet panel. Respondents completed one of two survey versions (9 conditions and 20 conditions) comprising a validated measure of attitudes toward involvement in decision making, 6 CA questions (11 information attributes), 10 DCE questions (4 attributes: 3 process and the ability to make an informed decision), and demographic questions.

RESULTS

Of the 702 respondents who completed the survey, 58% were women, 48% were between 25 and 34 years old, and 48% were current parents. All types of information were identified to statistically significantly improve parents' ability to make a decision. Participants preferred taking an "active" role in decision making. Respondents to the 9-condition survey preferred information before 20 weeks (willingness to pay [WTP] £11.88; CI £5.56 to £19.53) and the 20-condition group after 20 weeks (WTP £15.91; CI £10.64 to £21.63). All respondents disliked receiving information 3 days after birth, with the 20-condition group also being averse to receiving it on day 5 (WTP -£11.20; CI -£18.40 to 5.72). Respondents in both groups preferred to receive their information in an individual discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that parents' preferences for receiving NBS information differ from how this information is given in current UK practice.

摘要

背景

国家新生儿血斑筛查项目(NBSPs)正在不断扩展,以筛查更多病症。

目的

量化父母对信息的偏好以及在示例NBSPs中提供信息的方式。

方法

设计了一项混合选择实验,结合了联合分析和离散选择实验。通过互联网面板确定了年龄在18至45岁之间的当前和未来父母样本。受访者完成了两个调查版本之一(9种病症和20种病症),其中包括对参与决策态度的有效测量、6个联合分析问题(11个信息属性)、10个离散选择实验问题(4个属性:3个过程和做出明智决策的能力)以及人口统计学问题。

结果

在完成调查的702名受访者中,58%为女性,48%年龄在25至34岁之间,48%为当前父母。所有类型的信息在统计学上均显著提高了父母的决策能力。参与者倾向于在决策中发挥“积极”作用。9种病症调查版本的受访者更喜欢在20周前获得信息(支付意愿[WTP]为11.88英镑;置信区间为5.56英镑至19.53英镑),而20种病症组的受访者更喜欢在20周后获得信息(WTP为15.91英镑;置信区间为10.64英镑至21.63英镑)。所有受访者都不喜欢在出生后3天收到信息,20种病症组的受访者也不愿意在第5天收到信息(WTP为 -11.20英镑;置信区间为 -18.40英镑至5.72英镑)。两组受访者都更喜欢通过个人讨论来获取信息。

结论

本研究表明,父母对接收新生儿筛查信息的偏好与英国当前实践中提供信息的方式不同。

相似文献

1
Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs.探寻新生儿血斑筛查项目中信息提供的偏好
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.了解助产士在提供新生儿血斑筛查信息方面的偏好。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan 18;3(1):2381468317746170. doi: 10.1177/2381468317746170. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
3
Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查项目偏好的影响。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):23814683241232935. doi: 10.1177/23814683241232935. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
4
Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.新生儿筛查的产前信息提供:一项序贯探索性混合方法项目。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(55):1-240. doi: 10.3310/hta21550.
5
Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol.在北卡罗来纳州新生儿外显子测序通用筛查(NC NEXUS)研究中评估父母为其子女进行下一代测序的决策:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2686-4.
6
Understanding parent preferences for NHS paediatric allergy services.了解家长对英国国家医疗服务体系儿科过敏服务的偏好。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2020 Oct;50(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1111/cea.13712. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
An evaluation of pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes about newborn bloodspot screening.对孕妇关于新生儿血斑筛查的知识和态度的评估。
Midwifery. 2017 Feb;45:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
8
Maternal knowledge and attitudes to universal newborn hearing screening: Reviewing an established program.母亲对新生儿普遍听力筛查的知识与态度:回顾一项既定计划。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Feb;105:146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
9
Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: a survey of underrepresented parents.对使用新生儿干血斑进行研究的态度:代表性不足的父母调查。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.010.
10
Informing New Mothers about Newborn Screening Bloodspot Repositories during Postpartum Hospitalization.在产后住院期间告知新妈妈有关新生儿筛查血斑库的信息。
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2019 Nov/Dec;44(6):332-337. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000562.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternity Care Providers' Experiences with Providing Information on Newborn Bloodspot Screening During Pregnancy: A Dutch Survey Study.产科护理人员在孕期提供新生儿血斑筛查信息的经历:一项荷兰调查研究
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 Jan 8;11(1):5. doi: 10.3390/ijns11010005.
2
Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.产前和新生儿筛查计划在健康经济评估中的获益和危害:VALENTIA 系统评价和定性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(25):1-180. doi: 10.3310/PYTK6591.
3
Psychosocial Impact of False-Positive Newborn Screening Results: A Scoping Review.
新生儿筛查假阳性结果的社会心理影响:一项范围综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;11(5):507. doi: 10.3390/children11050507.
4
Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查项目偏好的影响。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):23814683241232935. doi: 10.1177/23814683241232935. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
5
How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.女性希望如何接收关于无创性产前检测的信息?来自离散选择实验的证据。
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-1389. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
6
Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.杜氏肌营养不良症家庭的诊断经验及其对新生儿筛查的偏好:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2022 Jun;190(2):169-177. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31992. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review.健康经济评估中采用的产前和新生儿筛查计划的效益和危害评估方法:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 24;11(8):e048031. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048031.
8
Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.产前和新生儿筛查方面的偏好:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2278-7.
9
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
10
Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.了解助产士在提供新生儿血斑筛查信息方面的偏好。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan 18;3(1):2381468317746170. doi: 10.1177/2381468317746170. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.