• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解助产士在提供新生儿血斑筛查信息方面的偏好。

Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.

作者信息

Wright Stuart James, Ulph Fiona, Lavender Tina, Dharni Nimarta, Payne Katherine

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).

Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan 18;3(1):2381468317746170. doi: 10.1177/2381468317746170. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2381468317746170
PMID:30288434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6125045/
Abstract

Understanding preferences for information provision in the context of health care service provision is challenging because of the number of potential attributes that may influence preferences. This study aimed to identify midwives' preferences for the process and outcomes of information provision in an expanded national newborn bloodspot screening program. A sample of practicing midwives completed a hybrid-stated preference survey including a conjoint analysis (CA) and discrete choice experiment to quantify preferences for the types of, and way in which, information should be provided in a newborn bloodspot screening program. Six conjoint analysis questions captured the impact of different types of information on parents' ability to make a decision, and 10 discrete choice experiment questions identified preferences for four process attributes (including parents' ability to make a decision). Midwives employed by the UK National Health Service (n = 134) completed the survey. All types of information content were perceived to improve parents' ability to make a decision except for the possibility of false-positive results. Late pregnancy was seen to be the best time to provide information, followed by day 3 postbirth. Information before 20 weeks of pregnancy was viewed as reducing parents' ability to make a decision. Midwives preferred information to be provided by an individual discussion and did not think parents should receive information on the Internet. A hybrid stated preference survey design identified that a wide variety of information should be provided to maximize parents' ability to make a decision ideally provided late in pregnancy or on day 3 postbirth.

摘要

由于可能影响偏好的潜在属性数量众多,了解在医疗服务提供背景下的信息提供偏好具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定助产士对国家扩大新生儿血斑筛查项目中信息提供过程和结果的偏好。一组执业助产士完成了一项混合陈述偏好调查,包括联合分析(CA)和离散选择实验,以量化新生儿血斑筛查项目中应提供的信息类型和方式的偏好。六个联合分析问题捕捉了不同类型信息对父母决策能力的影响,十个离散选择实验问题确定了对四个过程属性(包括父母的决策能力)的偏好。英国国民医疗服务体系雇佣的助产士(n = 134)完成了调查。除了假阳性结果的可能性外,所有类型的信息内容都被认为能提高父母的决策能力。妊娠晚期被视为提供信息的最佳时间,其次是产后第3天。妊娠20周前提供信息被认为会降低父母的决策能力。助产士更喜欢通过个人讨论提供信息,并且认为父母不应该在互联网上获取信息。一种混合陈述偏好调查设计表明,应提供各种各样的信息,以最大限度地提高父母的决策能力,理想情况下应在妊娠晚期或产后第3天提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/6125045/dbe78f033bf3/10.1177_2381468317746170-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/6125045/81c1934e001e/10.1177_2381468317746170-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/6125045/dbe78f033bf3/10.1177_2381468317746170-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/6125045/81c1934e001e/10.1177_2381468317746170-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb5/6125045/dbe78f033bf3/10.1177_2381468317746170-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening.了解助产士在提供新生儿血斑筛查信息方面的偏好。
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 Jan 18;3(1):2381468317746170. doi: 10.1177/2381468317746170. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
2
Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs.探寻新生儿血斑筛查项目中信息提供的偏好
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
3
Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project.新生儿筛查的产前信息提供:一项序贯探索性混合方法项目。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(55):1-240. doi: 10.3310/hta21550.
4
Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查项目偏好的影响。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):23814683241232935. doi: 10.1177/23814683241232935. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
5
An exploration of parents' preferences for foot care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a possible role for the discrete choice experiment.探索父母对青少年特发性关节炎足部护理的偏好:离散选择实验的可能作用。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Feb 6;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-10.
6
Service Preferences of Parents of Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Conjoint Analysis Study.儿童轻度双侧或单侧听力损失父母的服务偏好:一项联合分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):671-679. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000651.
7
Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study.父母对听力损失儿童服务的偏好:一项联合分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):842-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318157676d.
8
Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.合作设计干预措施以改善新生儿足跟血筛查阳性结果沟通的效果评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e050773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773.
9
Prioritising wheelchair services for children: a pilot discrete choice experiment to understand how child wheelchair users and their parents prioritise different attributes of wheelchair services.为儿童确定轮椅服务的优先次序:一项试点离散选择实验,以了解儿童轮椅使用者及其父母如何对轮椅服务的不同属性进行优先排序。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Jul 19;2:32. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0074-y. eCollection 2016.
10
Consent for newborn screening: screening professionals' and parents' views.新生儿筛查同意书:筛查专业人员和家长的观点。
Public Health. 2020 Jan;178:151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Maternity Care Providers' Experiences with Providing Information on Newborn Bloodspot Screening During Pregnancy: A Dutch Survey Study.产科护理人员在孕期提供新生儿血斑筛查信息的经历:一项荷兰调查研究
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 Jan 8;11(1):5. doi: 10.3390/ijns11010005.
3
Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs.探寻新生儿血斑筛查项目中信息提供的偏好
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):651-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Willingness to Pay for a Newborn Screening Test for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.为脊髓性肌萎缩症新生儿筛查检测支付费用的意愿。
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Jan;66:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.离散选择实验的应答率:一项荟萃分析
患者对罕见病遗传新生儿筛查的偏好:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e081835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081835.
4
Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom.了解不同信息提供模式对英国新生儿血斑筛查项目偏好的影响。
MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):23814683241232935. doi: 10.1177/23814683241232935. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
5
Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.杜氏肌营养不良症家庭的诊断经验及其对新生儿筛查的偏好:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2022 Jun;190(2):169-177. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31992. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
6
Preferences for aspects of antenatal and newborn screening: a systematic review.产前和新生儿筛查方面的偏好:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2278-7.
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-817. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.药学服务的离散选择实验:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1.
5
Public Perceptions of the Benefits and Risks of Newborn Screening.公众对新生儿筛查的益处和风险的看法。
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):e413-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0518. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
6
Valuing Preferences for the Process and Outcomes of Clinical Genetics Services: A Pilot Study.重视临床遗传学服务的过程和结果偏好:一项试点研究。
Patient. 2016 Apr;9(2):135-47. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0133-0.
7
The Role of Information Provision in Economic Evaluations of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Review.信息提供在新生儿血斑筛查经济评估中的作用:一项系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):615-26. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0177-2.
8
Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.
9
Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.作为离散选择实验中一个属性的风险:文献的系统综述
Patient. 2014;7(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0048-1.
10
Parental decision-making and acceptance of newborn bloodspot screening: an exploratory study.父母对新生儿足跟血筛查的决策和接受情况:一项探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e79441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079441. eCollection 2013.