Personalized Genomic Medicine Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Functional Genomics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea.
Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;77(11):2822-2833. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3033. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
Dynamic chromatin structures result in differential chemical reactivity to mutational processes throughout the genome. To identify chromatin features responsible for mutagenesis, we compared chromatin architecture around single-nucleotide variants (SNV), insertion/deletions (indels), and their context-matched, nonmutated positions. We found epigenetic differences between genomic regions containing missense SNVs and those containing frameshift indels across multiple cancer types. Levels of active histone marks were higher around frameshift indels than around missense SNV, whereas repressive histone marks exhibited the reverse trend. Accumulation of repressive histone marks and nucleosomes distinguished mutated positions (both SNV and indels) from the context-matched, nonmutated positions, whereas active marks were associated with substitution- and cancer type-specific mutagenesis. We also explained mutagenesis based on genome maintenance mechanisms, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Regional NER variation correlated strongly with chromatin features; NER machineries exhibited shifted or depleted binding around SNV, resulting in decreased NER at mutation positions, especially at sites of recurrent mutations. MMR-deficient tumors selectively acquired SNV in regions with high active histone marks, especially H3K36me3, whereas POLE-deficient tumors selectively acquired indels and SNV in regions with low active histone marks. These findings demonstrate the importance of fine-scaled chromatin structures and associated DNA repair mechanisms in mutagenesis. .
动态染色质结构导致基因组中不同位置对突变过程的化学反应性存在差异。为了鉴定导致突变的染色质特征,我们比较了单核苷酸变体(SNV)、插入/缺失(indels)及其上下文匹配的非突变位置周围的染色质结构。我们发现,在多种癌症类型中,包含错义 SNV 的基因组区域与包含移码 indels 的基因组区域之间存在表观遗传差异。移码 indels 周围的活性组蛋白标记水平高于错义 SNV,而抑制性组蛋白标记则呈现相反的趋势。抑制性组蛋白标记和核小体的积累将突变位置(包括 SNV 和 indels)与上下文匹配的非突变位置区分开来,而活性标记与取代和癌症类型特异性突变有关。我们还根据基因组维护机制(包括核苷酸切除修复(NER)、错配修复(MMR)和 DNA 聚合酶 epsilon(POLE))解释了突变。区域 NER 变化与染色质特征密切相关;NER 机械在 SNV 周围表现出移位或耗尽的结合,导致突变位置的 NER 减少,尤其是在反复突变的位点。MMR 缺陷型肿瘤选择性地在具有高活性组蛋白标记(尤其是 H3K36me3)的区域获得 SNV,而 POLE 缺陷型肿瘤选择性地在具有低活性组蛋白标记的区域获得 indels 和 SNV。这些发现表明精细的染色质结构和相关的 DNA 修复机制在突变中非常重要。