Messer M P, Schönenberger S, Möhlenbruch M A, Pfaff J, Herweh C, Ringleb P A, Nagel S
From the Departments of Neurology (M.P.M., S.S., P.A.R., S.N.).
Neuroradiology (M.A.M., J.P., C.H.), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1177-1179. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5164. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
While mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusions is now an evidence-based treatment, its efficacy and safety in minor stroke syndromes (NIHSS ≤ 5) is not proved. We identified, in our prospective data base, 378 patients with minor strokes in the anterior circulation; 54 (14.2%) of these had proved large-vessel occlusions. Eight of 54 (14.8%) were immediately treated with mechanical thrombectomy, 6/54 (11.1%) after early neurologic deterioration, and the rest were treated with standard thrombolysis only. Rates of successful recanalization were similar between the 2 mechanical thrombectomy groups (75% versus 100%). Rates of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-1) were higher in patients with immediate thrombectomy (75%) compared with patients with delayed thrombectomy (33.3%) and thrombolysis only (55%). No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in either group. These descriptive data are encouraging, and further analysis of large registries or even randomized controlled trials in this patient subgroup should be performed.
虽然大血管闭塞的机械取栓术目前是一种基于证据的治疗方法,但其在轻度卒中综合征(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≤5分)中的疗效和安全性尚未得到证实。我们在我们的前瞻性数据库中识别出378例前循环轻度卒中患者;其中54例(14.2%)已证实存在大血管闭塞。54例中的8例(14.8%)立即接受了机械取栓治疗,6/54例(11.1%)在早期神经功能恶化后接受治疗,其余仅接受标准溶栓治疗。两个机械取栓治疗组的成功再通率相似(分别为75%和100%)。与延迟取栓患者(33.3%)和仅接受溶栓治疗的患者(55%)相比,立即接受取栓治疗的患者获得良好预后(改良Rankin量表评分0 - 1分)的比例更高。两组均未发生有症状的颅内出血。这些描述性数据令人鼓舞,应该对该患者亚组进行大型登记研究甚至随机对照试验的进一步分析。