• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

袖状胃切除术后渗漏的病因:当前证据

Etiology of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Current Evidence.

作者信息

Hussain Abdulzahra, Vasas Peter, Kirk Katie, Finney John, Balchandra Srinivasan

机构信息

Bariatric Unit, General Surgery Department, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, UK.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Jun;27(3):119-122. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000400.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000400
PMID:28414699
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to study the causes of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed was searched during January 2016 for publications reporting leak after SG. A total of 205 publications were identified, of which 17 papers were selected.

RESULTS

In about 3018 patients, reinforcement was used compared with 4595 patients, in whom no reinforcement was applied; both groups were representing matched bariatric populations. The use of reinforcement/buttressing has resulted in different rates of leaks ranging from 0% to 3.9%; whereas with no reinforcement/buttressing, the leak rate was 0.16% to 3.5%. The use of reinforcement/buttressing did not result in reduction of leak to a statistical significance although the trend was suggesting so (P=0.06), whereas no reinforcement/buttressing did not statistically increase the leak rate (P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistical significant difference of leak with or without reinforcement. This mean case complexity and surgical technique and experience are the sole factors for leaks following SG.

摘要

目的

本文旨在研究袖状胃切除术(SG)后发生渗漏的原因。

材料与方法

于2016年1月在PubMed上检索关于SG术后渗漏报道的文献。共识别出205篇文献,从中选取了17篇论文。

结果

约3018例患者使用了加固材料,4595例患者未使用加固材料;两组均为匹配的肥胖症患者群体。使用加固/支撑材料导致的渗漏率在0%至3.9%之间;而未使用加固/支撑材料时,渗漏率为0.16%至3.5%。使用加固/支撑材料虽有使渗漏减少的趋势(P = 0.06),但未达到统计学显著差异,而未使用加固/支撑材料也未在统计学上增加渗漏率(P = 0.10)。

结论

使用或不使用加固材料在渗漏方面无统计学显著差异。这意味着病例复杂性、手术技术和经验是SG术后发生渗漏的唯一因素。

相似文献

1
Etiology of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Current Evidence.袖状胃切除术后渗漏的病因:当前证据
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Jun;27(3):119-122. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000400.
2
Evaluating the effect of operative technique on leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study.评估手术技术对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后渗漏的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
3
The Impact of Staple Line Reinforcement Utilization on Bleeding and Leak Rates Following Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Obesity: a Propensity and Case-Control Matched Analysis.吻合器缝线加固在重度肥胖患者袖状胃切除术后对出血和渗漏发生率的影响:一项倾向评分及病例对照匹配分析
Obes Surg. 2019 Aug;29(8):2449-2463. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03883-8.
4
Definitive surgical management of staple line leak after sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术后吻合口漏的确定性手术治疗
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):1037-43. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line reinforcement with oversewing and staple line inversion vs buttressing material: A randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合缝线加固、吻合口翻折与支撑材料对术后恶心呕吐发生率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Nov;59:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences.在袖状胃切除术后,加固并不一定会降低吻合口漏的发生率。文献综述与临床经验
Obes Surg. 2009 Feb;19(2):166-172. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9668-7. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.四种吻合口加固方式下腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏率的比较:一项系统评价
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
9
Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients.高危患者袖状胃切除术中可吸收吻合钉线加固的临床与经济评估
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1710-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1991-1.
10
Large Bariatric-Specific Stents and Over-the-Scope Clips in the Management of Post-Bariatric Surgery Leaks.大型特定减肥手术支架和内镜夹在减肥手术后渗漏管理中的应用
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2808-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors and Management Approaches for Staple Line Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 402 Patients.袖状胃切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素及处理方法:一项对402例患者的单中心回顾性研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):1422. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091422.
2
Perineal pseudocontinent colostomy: an alternative method to promote patients' satisfaction and safety?会阴假性节制性结肠造口术:一种提高患者满意度和安全性的替代方法?
Prz Gastroenterol. 2023;18(2):216-218. doi: 10.5114/pg.2022.116998. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
3
Thyroid Hormone Changes After Sleeve Gastrectomy With and Without Antral Preservation.
袖状胃切除术伴与不伴胃窦保留术后甲状腺激素的变化。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):224-231. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04896-4. Epub 2020 Aug 3.