Suppr超能文献

袖状胃切除术后渗漏的病因:当前证据

Etiology of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Current Evidence.

作者信息

Hussain Abdulzahra, Vasas Peter, Kirk Katie, Finney John, Balchandra Srinivasan

机构信息

Bariatric Unit, General Surgery Department, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, UK.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Jun;27(3):119-122. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000400.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to study the causes of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed was searched during January 2016 for publications reporting leak after SG. A total of 205 publications were identified, of which 17 papers were selected.

RESULTS

In about 3018 patients, reinforcement was used compared with 4595 patients, in whom no reinforcement was applied; both groups were representing matched bariatric populations. The use of reinforcement/buttressing has resulted in different rates of leaks ranging from 0% to 3.9%; whereas with no reinforcement/buttressing, the leak rate was 0.16% to 3.5%. The use of reinforcement/buttressing did not result in reduction of leak to a statistical significance although the trend was suggesting so (P=0.06), whereas no reinforcement/buttressing did not statistically increase the leak rate (P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistical significant difference of leak with or without reinforcement. This mean case complexity and surgical technique and experience are the sole factors for leaks following SG.

摘要

目的

本文旨在研究袖状胃切除术(SG)后发生渗漏的原因。

材料与方法

于2016年1月在PubMed上检索关于SG术后渗漏报道的文献。共识别出205篇文献,从中选取了17篇论文。

结果

约3018例患者使用了加固材料,4595例患者未使用加固材料;两组均为匹配的肥胖症患者群体。使用加固/支撑材料导致的渗漏率在0%至3.9%之间;而未使用加固/支撑材料时,渗漏率为0.16%至3.5%。使用加固/支撑材料虽有使渗漏减少的趋势(P = 0.06),但未达到统计学显著差异,而未使用加固/支撑材料也未在统计学上增加渗漏率(P = 0.10)。

结论

使用或不使用加固材料在渗漏方面无统计学显著差异。这意味着病例复杂性、手术技术和经验是SG术后发生渗漏的唯一因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验