• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在儿童和青少年中使用不同体重指数参考标准的影响]

[The implications of using different body mass index references in children and adolescents].

作者信息

Pedersen Dorthe Corfitzen, Pearson Seija, Baker Jennifer Lyn

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2017 Apr 3;179(14).

PMID:28416073
Abstract

To classify children as overweight or obese, their body mass index (BMI) must be compared with a growth reference and be accompanied by a clinical assessment. In Denmark, there is a lack of consensus on which BMI reference to use; a mix of national and international references are used in clinics, hospitals and research institutions. In this article, the implications of using different references are illustrated with Danish data. The comparisons show that the references yield different prevalences of overweight in a non-predictable way, making comparisons and monitoring challenging.

摘要

要将儿童归类为超重或肥胖,必须将他们的体重指数(BMI)与生长参考标准进行比较,并伴有临床评估。在丹麦,对于使用哪种BMI参考标准缺乏共识;诊所、医院和研究机构使用的是国家和国际参考标准的混合体。在本文中,使用丹麦的数据说明了使用不同参考标准的影响。比较结果表明,这些参考标准以不可预测的方式产生不同的超重患病率,这使得比较和监测具有挑战性。

相似文献

1
[The implications of using different body mass index references in children and adolescents].[在儿童和青少年中使用不同体重指数参考标准的影响]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2017 Apr 3;179(14).
2
Childhood obesity classification systems and cardiometabolic risk factors: a comparison of the Italian, World Health Organization and International Obesity Task Force references.儿童肥胖分类系统与心血管代谢危险因素:意大利、世界卫生组织及国际肥胖特别工作组参考标准的比较
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Feb 4;43(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0338-z.
3
Body mass index and childhood obesity classification systems: A comparison of the French, International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) and World Health Organization (WHO) references.体重指数与儿童肥胖分类系统:法国、国际肥胖特别工作组(IOTF)及世界卫生组织(WHO)参考标准的比较
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2015 Jun;63(3):173-82. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
[Comparison of three weight classification systems for preschool children in a region of Quebec].[魁北克某地区三种学龄前儿童体重分类系统的比较]
Sante Publique. 2013 Sep-Oct;25(5):571-8.
5
Relationship between childhood obesity cut-offs and metabolic and vascular comorbidities: comparative analysis of three growth standards.儿童肥胖临界值与代谢及血管合并症之间的关系:三种生长标准的比较分析
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Apr;27 Suppl 2:75-83. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12140. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
6
Optimal cut-off points of weight for height, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio for defining overweight and obesity in Thai school-aged children.泰国学龄儿童中用于定义超重和肥胖的身高体重、腰围及腰高比的最佳切点
J Res Health Sci. 2013 May 29;13(1):13-8.
7
Prevalence of obesity in Italian adolescents: does the use of different growth charts make the difference?意大利青少年肥胖症的流行情况:使用不同的生长图表是否会产生差异?
World J Pediatr. 2018 Apr;14(2):168-175. doi: 10.1007/s12519-018-0131-0. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
[Overweight and obesity prevalence estimates in a population from Zaragoza by using different growth references].[使用不同生长参考标准对萨拉戈萨人群超重和肥胖患病率的估计]
An Pediatr (Barc). 2015 Mar;82(3):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
9
Body mass index reference curves for Tunisian children.突尼斯儿童的身体质量指数参考曲线。
Arch Pediatr. 2018 Nov;25(8):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
A contemporary description of French newborns' growth using the Efemeris cohort.利用埃费梅里斯队列对法国新生儿生长情况的当代描述。
Arch Pediatr. 2017 May;24(5):424-431. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2017.02.023. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the prevalence of overweight/obesity overestimated among Saudi children and adolescents?沙特儿童和青少年中超重/肥胖的患病率是否被高估了?
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov-Dec;25(6):399. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_461_19.