Suppr超能文献

接受米拉贝隆联合索利那新治疗的难治性膀胱过度活动症失禁患者的心血管安全性(BESIDE研究)

Cardiovascular safety in refractory incontinent patients with overactive bladder receiving add-on mirabegron therapy to solifenacin (BESIDE).

作者信息

Drake Marcus J, MacDiarmid Scott, Chapple Christopher R, Esen Adil, Athanasiou Stavros, Cambronero Santos Javier, Mitcheson David, Herschorn Sender, Siddiqui Emad, Huang Moses, Stoelzel Matthias

机构信息

University of Bristol and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK.

Alliance Urology Specialists, Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2017 May;71(5). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12944. Epub 2017 Apr 16.

Abstract

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: In the BESIDE study, combination therapy (antimuscarinic [solifenacin] and β -adrenoceptor agonist [mirabegron]) improved efficacy over solifenacin monotherapy without exacerbating anticholinergic side effects in overactive bladder (OAB) patients; however, a potential synergistic effect on the cardiovascular (CV) system requires investigation.

METHODS

OAB patients remaining incontinent despite daily solifenacin 5 mg during 4-week single-blind run-in, were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination (solifenacin 5 mg/mirabegron 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg after week 4), solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 weeks. CV safety assessments included frequency of CV-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), change from baseline in vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse rate) and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters.

RESULTS

The frequency of hypertension, tachycardia and ECG QT prolongation, respectively, was low and comparable across combination (1.1%, 0.3%, 0.1%), solifenacin 5 mg (0.7%, 0.1%, 0.1%), and solifenacin 10 mg groups (0.8%, 0%, 0.1%). Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in SBP, DBP, and pulse rate with combination (0.07 mm Hg [0.38], -0.35 mm Hg [0.26], 0.47 bpm [0.28]), solifenacin 5 mg (-0.93 mm Hg [0.38], -0.45 mm Hg [0.26], 0.43 bpm [0.28]) and solifenacin 10 mg (-1.28 mm Hg [0.38], -0.48 mm Hg [0.26], 0.27 bpm [0.28]) was generally comparable, with the exception of a mean treatment difference of ~1 mm Hg in SBP between combination and solifenacin monotherapy; SBP was unchanged with combination and decreased with solifenacin monotherapy. Mean changes from baseline to EoT in ECG parameters were generally similar across treatment groups, except for QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula, which was higher with solifenacin 10 mg (3.30 mseconds) vs. combination (0.49 mseconds) and solifenacin 5 mg (0.77 mseconds).

CONCLUSION

The comparable frequency of CV-related TEAEs, changes in vital signs and ECG parameters indicates no synergistic effect on CV safety outcomes when mirabegron and solifenacin are combined.

摘要

目的

在膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者中进行的BESIDE研究表明,联合治疗(抗毒蕈碱药物[索利那新]和β-肾上腺素能受体激动剂[米拉贝隆])相较于索利那新单药治疗可提高疗效,且不会加重抗胆碱能副作用;然而,对心血管(CV)系统的潜在协同作用需要进行研究。

方法

在为期4周的单盲导入期内,尽管每日服用5毫克索利那新仍有尿失禁的OAB患者,按1:1:1随机分为双盲每日联合治疗组(索利那新5毫克/米拉贝隆25毫克,第4周后增至50毫克)、索利那新5毫克组或10毫克组,并治疗12周。CV安全性评估包括与CV相关的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的频率、生命体征(收缩压[SBP]、舒张压[DBP]、脉搏率)和心电图(ECG)参数相对于基线的变化。

结果

联合治疗组(1.1%、0.3%、0.1%)、索利那新5毫克组(0.7%、0.1%、0.1%)和索利那新10毫克组(0.8%、0%、0.1%)中,高血压、心动过速和ECG QT间期延长的频率分别较低且相当。联合治疗组(0.07毫米汞柱[0.38]、-0.35毫米汞柱[0.26]、0.47次/分钟[0.28])、索利那新5毫克组(-0.93毫米汞柱[0.38]、-0. 45毫米汞柱[0.26]、0.43次/分钟[0.28])和索利那新10毫克组(-1.28毫米汞柱[ 0.38]、-0.48毫米汞柱[0.26]、0.27次/分钟[0.28])从基线到治疗结束(EoT)时SBP、DBP和脉搏率的调整后均值(SE)变化总体相当,但联合治疗与索利那新单药治疗之间SBP的平均治疗差异约为1毫米汞柱;联合治疗时SBP无变化,索利那新单药治疗时SBP降低。各治疗组从基线到EoT时ECG参数的平均变化总体相似,但使用弗里德里西亚公式校正的QT间期除外,索利那新10毫克组(3.30毫秒)高于联合治疗组(0.49毫秒)和索利那新5毫克组(0.77毫秒)。

结论

与CV相关的TEAE频率、生命体征变化和ECG参数相当,表明米拉贝隆和索利那新联合使用时对CV安全结局无协同作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44be/5485167/12a5a50d0f24/IJCP-71-na-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验