• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人烧伤后瘢痕结局预测因素的识别:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。

Identification of factors predicting scar outcome after burn in adults: A prospective case-control study.

作者信息

Wallace Hilary J, Fear Mark W, Crowe Margaret M, Martin Lisa J, Wood Fiona M

机构信息

Burn Injury Research Unit, Faculty of Health and Medial Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Burns Service of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1271-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2017.03.017
PMID:28420569
Abstract

This study examined influences on scarring after burn in a prospective study using a defined outcome measure: scar height measured by a modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS). A prospective case-control study was conducted among 616 adult subjects who sustained a burn in Western Australia. Patient factors influencing scar outcome including gender, Fitzpatrick skin type and selected co-morbidities were explored, as well as injury and clinical factors. A logistic regression model for raised scar after burn was developed which achieved an overall correct prediction rate of 81.1%; 74.8% for those with raised scar and 86.0% for those without raised scar. From this study, injury and clinical predictors for raised scar after adjustment for other variables are: increasing %TBSA, greater burn depth as indicated by level of surgical intervention, wound complications and prolonged hospital stay. Intrinsic patient predictors for raised scar in patients with comparable injuries are: young age (≤30 years), female gender and Fitzpatrick skin types 4-6. The strength of association statistics (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals) reported will be of practical benefit for clinical decision-making and counselling of patients, and plausible biological explanations for the findings support the validity of the results.

摘要

本研究采用一种明确的结局指标

通过改良温哥华瘢痕量表(mVSS)测量瘢痕高度,以前瞻性研究的方式探究烧伤后瘢痕形成的影响因素。在西澳大利亚州对616名成年烧伤患者进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究。研究探讨了影响瘢痕结局的患者因素,包括性别、菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型和选定的合并症,以及损伤和临床因素。建立了一个烧伤后瘢痕增生的逻辑回归模型,其总体正确预测率为81.1%;瘢痕增生患者的预测率为74.8%,无瘢痕增生患者的预测率为86.0%。通过本研究,在对其他变量进行调整后,烧伤后瘢痕增生的损伤和临床预测因素为:烧伤总面积百分比增加、手术干预程度所表明的烧伤深度增加、伤口并发症和住院时间延长。在损伤程度相当的患者中,瘢痕增生的内在患者预测因素为:年轻(≤30岁)、女性以及菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型4 - 6。所报告的关联强度统计数据(比值比和95%置信区间)将对临床决策和患者咨询具有实际益处,并且对研究结果合理的生物学解释支持了结果的有效性。

相似文献

1
Identification of factors predicting scar outcome after burn in adults: A prospective case-control study.成人烧伤后瘢痕结局预测因素的识别:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1271-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
2
Identification of factors predicting scar outcome after burn injury in children: a prospective case-control study.儿童烧伤后瘢痕结局预测因素的识别:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Burns Trauma. 2017 Jul 3;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s41038-017-0084-x. eCollection 2017.
3
A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.改良温哥华瘢痕量表结合体表面积(mVSS-TBSA):一种创新烧伤瘢痕评估方法的组内信度。
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
4
Predicting severity of pathological scarring due to burn injuries: a clinical decision making tool using Bayesian networks.预测烧伤所致病理性瘢痕的严重程度:一种使用贝叶斯网络的临床决策工具。
Int Wound J. 2014 Jun;11(3):246-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01080.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
Analysis of the predictors of hypertrophic scarring pain and neuropathic pain after burn.烧伤后肥厚性瘢痕疼痛和神经性疼痛的预测因素分析
Burns. 2022 Sep;48(6):1425-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
6
Modified Vancouver Scar Scale score is linked with quality of life after burn.改良温哥华瘢痕量表评分与烧伤后的生活质量相关。
Burns. 2017 Jun;43(4):741-746. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
7
Genetic risk factors for hypertrophic scar development.肥厚性瘢痕形成的遗传风险因素。
J Burn Care Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):477-82. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182a2aa41.
8
Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.烧伤客观瘢痕量表(BOSS):基于客观测量设备的烧伤瘢痕量表的验证。
Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
9
Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix following early dermabrasion reduces length of stay in extensive deep dermal burns.早期磨皮术后使用猪脱细胞真皮基质可缩短大面积深度真皮烧伤的住院时间。
Burns. 2016 May;42(3):598-604. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.10.018. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
10
Genetic influence on scar height and pliability after burn injury in individuals of European ancestry: A prospective cohort study.遗传因素对欧洲裔个体烧伤后瘢痕高度和柔韧性的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Burns. 2019 May;45(3):567-578. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of systematic nursing on scar appearance following radical thyroidectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.系统性护理对甲状腺癌根治术后瘢痕外观的影响:一项回顾性队列分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 10;15(1):29235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06419-6.
2
Unveiling the Link: The Potential Roles of Vitamin D in Keloid Pathophysiology.揭示关联:维生素D在瘢痕疙瘩病理生理学中的潜在作用
Exp Dermatol. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/exd.70043.
3
Exploring the gaps: A scoping review of burn injury research in skin of colour.探索差距:对有色人种皮肤烧伤研究的范围综述
Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):e13252. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13252.
4
Evidence Supporting Conservative Scar Management Interventions Following Burn Injury: A Review Article.烧伤后支持保守瘢痕管理干预措施的证据:一篇综述文章。
J Burn Care Res. 2025 Aug 12;46(3):504-514. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae204.
5
The efficacy, satisfaction, and safety of carbon dioxide (CO2) fractional laser in combination with pulsed dye laser (PDL) versus each one alone in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.二氧化碳(CO2)点阵激光联合脉冲染料激光(PDL)与单独使用两者之一治疗增生性烧伤瘢痕的疗效、满意度和安全性:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Feb 20;39(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03976-6.
6
The Short- and Long-Term Outcome Priorities of a Western Australian Adult Burn Population.西澳大利亚州成年烧伤人群的近期和远期预后重点。
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Mar 4;45(2):451-458. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad175.
7
Development and validation of a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring.病理性瘢痕风险评估量表的制定与验证。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3628-3638. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14241. Epub 2023 May 21.
8
Current understanding of the chronic stress response to burn injury from human studies.人类研究对烧伤损伤慢性应激反应的当前理解。
Burns Trauma. 2023 Mar 14;11:tkad007. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad007. eCollection 2023.
9
Management of Burn Scars: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.烧伤瘢痕的管理:一项五年回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 13;14(11):e31448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31448. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Burn model system national longitudinal database representativeness by race, ethnicity, gender, and age.烧伤模型系统国家纵向数据库的代表性,包括种族、民族、性别和年龄。
PM R. 2022 Apr;14(4):452-461. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12618. Epub 2021 Jun 22.