Suppr超能文献

二氧化碳(CO2)点阵激光联合脉冲染料激光(PDL)与单独使用两者之一治疗增生性烧伤瘢痕的疗效、满意度和安全性:一项单盲随机对照试验。

The efficacy, satisfaction, and safety of carbon dioxide (CO2) fractional laser in combination with pulsed dye laser (PDL) versus each one alone in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Medical Students Association, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.

Department of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Feb 20;39(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-03976-6.

Abstract

The tendency to use less-invasive laser-based methods with far more obvious effectiveness has been taken into consideration today for improvement of burning scars. The present study thus aimed to assess the efficacy of two laser-based techniques including pulsed dye laser (PDL) and ablative fractional CO2 laser (AFCL) and its combination on improving different aspects of burning scars regardless of the types of scar as hypertrophic or keloid scars. This randomized single-blinded clinical trial was performed on patients suffering hypertrophic or keloid burning scars. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups scheduling for treatment with PDL alone, AFCL alone, or its combination. All patients were visited before and 40 days after the last treatment session, and their scars were assessed. In all groups, significant improvement was revealed in the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) score, the color of scar, vascular bed in the scar, the and height of scar and its pliability; however, the improvement in each item was more highlighted in the group receiving a combination therapy with PDL and AFCL techniques. In this regard, the highest improvement was found in vascular bed and pliability in the combination therapy group as compared to other groups. Although the superiority of the combined group was not statistically significant, due to the high percentage of improvement in total VSS and most of its indicators, it can be clinically significant. The efficacy of the treatment protocols was different considering subgroups of mature and immature scars (less than 1 year), so that more improvement in pliability of scar, vascularity, and color of scar was found in the group scheduling for PDL + AFCL as compared to those who were treated with PDL alone in immature scar group but not in mature scar group. Combined treatment can be much more effective in improving the appearance and pathological characteristics of scars than each individual treatment. This effectiveness can be seen mainly in immature scars.

摘要

为了改善烧伤疤痕,今天已经考虑采用创伤更小、效果更明显的激光方法。因此,本研究旨在评估两种基于激光的技术,包括脉冲染料激光(PDL)和消融性分数 CO2 激光(AFCL)及其联合应用,改善烧伤疤痕的不同方面,无论疤痕是增生性疤痕还是瘢痕疙瘩。这是一项随机、单盲的临床试验,针对患有增生性或瘢痕疙瘩性烧伤疤痕的患者进行。患者被随机分为三组,分别接受 PDL 单独治疗、AFCL 单独治疗或联合治疗。所有患者在治疗前和最后一次治疗后 40 天进行就诊,并对他们的疤痕进行评估。在所有组中,温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评分、疤痕颜色、疤痕血管床、疤痕高度和柔韧性都有显著改善;然而,在接受 PDL 和 AFCL 联合治疗的组中,每个项目的改善更加明显。在这方面,联合治疗组在血管床和柔韧性方面的改善与其他组相比最为显著。尽管联合组的优势没有统计学意义,但由于总 VSS 及其大多数指标的改善率较高,因此具有临床意义。考虑到成熟和未成熟疤痕(<1 年)的亚组,治疗方案的疗效不同,因此,与单独接受 PDL 治疗的组相比,计划接受 PDL+AFCL 治疗的组中疤痕的柔韧性、血管生成和颜色改善更为显著,但在成熟疤痕组中并非如此。与单独治疗相比,联合治疗在改善疤痕外观和病理特征方面更为有效,特别是在未成熟疤痕中。这种有效性主要表现在未成熟的疤痕中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验