Department of Prosthodontics, Shahed University, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran, Iran.
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):67-74. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12622. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
To evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bonding between resin cement and lithia or zirconia-based ceramics using an in vitro study.
Three zirconia ceramic blocks (IPS e.max ZirCAD) and three lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (IPS e.max CAD) were sintered and duplicated in resin composite. The zirconia specimens underwent various treatments (n = 1): (i) Sandblast + primer (ZiSa); (ii) sandblast + laser irradiation + primer (ZiSaLa); or (iii) laser irradiation + primer (ZiLa). The lithium disilicate specimens also underwent various treatments: (i) sandblast + HF + silane (LiSaE); (ii) sandblast + silane (LiSa); or (iii) sandblast + laser irradiation + silane (LiSaLa). The ceramic-composite blocks were cemented with resin cement and cut to produce bars with approx. 1 mm bonding areas. The specimens were thermocycled, and bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine. The fracture type was determined by observing the fractured surface under a stereomicroscope. The mean bond strengths of the specimens were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's tests (α = 0.05).
Mean comparison of the μTBS showed no significant difference between LiSaE and LiSa (p > 0.05), but significant differences between LiSaE and other groups (p ≤ 0.01). No significant differences were found between the ZiSaLa and ZiSa groups (p > 0.05). The modes of failure in all groups were mostly adhesive (57% to 80%). The mean bond strengths in laser-irradiated ceramics were significantly lower than those from other surface treatments. All ZiLa specimens debonded before testing (pretest failure).
Lithium disilicate ceramic surface treated with a combination of sandblasting and silane application provided a bond strength comparable to that provided by sandblasting in combination with acid etching and applying silane. Groups treated with laser irradiation had significantly lower bond strengths than other groups.
通过体外研究评估不同表面处理对树脂水门汀与锂基或氧化锆基陶瓷粘结的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。
烧结并复制了 3 个氧化锆陶瓷块(IPS e.max ZirCAD)和 3 个二硅酸锂陶瓷块(IPS e.max CAD)于树脂复合材料中。对氧化锆试件进行了不同的处理(n = 1):(i)喷砂+底涂剂(ZiSa);(ii)喷砂+激光辐照+底涂剂(ZiSaLa);或(iii)激光辐照+底涂剂(ZiLa)。二硅酸锂试件也进行了不同的处理:(i)喷砂+HF+硅烷(LiSaE);(ii)喷砂+硅烷(LiSa);或(iii)喷砂+激光辐照+硅烷(LiSaLa)。用树脂水门汀将陶瓷-复合材料块粘结,然后切割成具有约 1mm 粘结面积的棒状。对试件进行热循环,然后在万能试验机上进行粘结强度测试。通过体视显微镜观察断裂面确定断裂类型。使用单因素方差分析和 Duncan 检验(α = 0.05)对试件的平均粘结强度进行统计分析。
μTBS 的均值比较显示,LiSaE 与 LiSa 之间无显著差异(p > 0.05),但 LiSaE 与其他组之间有显著差异(p ≤ 0.01)。ZiSaLa 与 ZiSa 组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。所有组的破坏模式主要为粘接力破坏(57%至 80%)。激光辐照陶瓷的平均粘结强度明显低于其他表面处理。所有 ZiLa 试件在测试前均发生脱粘(预测试失败)。
经过喷砂和硅烷联合处理的二硅酸锂陶瓷表面,其粘结强度可与喷砂联合酸蚀和硅烷处理相当。经激光辐照处理的组的粘结强度明显低于其他组。