Suppr超能文献

不同粘结策略对牙本质与间接树脂基复合材料微拉伸粘结强度的影响。

Effect of different adhesive strategies on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite.

作者信息

Pinto Guilherme, Prieto Lúcia, Pierote Josué-Junior, Ferraz Laura, Câmara João-Victor, Aguiar Flávio-Henrique

机构信息

Graduate student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Postdoctoral student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Nov 1;12(11):e1066-e1070. doi: 10.4317/jced.57094. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength of indirect resin composite bonded to dentin using five different adhesives strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty specimens (Solidex) were produced and randomly into five groups with different adhesives strategies: (G1)- Single Bond Universal + etch + silane + RelyX Ultimate, (G2)- Single Bond Universal + silane + RelyX Ultimate, (G3)- Single Bond Universal + etch + RelyX Ultimate, (G4)- Single Bond Universal + RelyX Ultimate, and (G5)-Scotchbond Multi-purpose + RelyX ARC. After cementation the specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24hours at 37°C. The specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to obtain beams and submitted to microtensile test. Microtensile values were expressed in MPa and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey tests (α=0.05).

RESULTS

The mean bond strength in MPa groups were: G1=11,48, G2=14,15, G3=16,95, G4=17,03 and G5=16,80. Statistical analysis showed that the bond strength values were not significantly affected by the different adhesive strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementation of dentin to indirect resin composite cannot be significantly affected by different adhesive strategies used. The specimens treated with silane, etch associated with Single bond universal did not increase bond strength values. Adhesives, dental cements, dentin.

摘要

背景

使用五种不同的粘结剂策略评估间接树脂复合材料与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。

材料与方法

制作40个标本(Solidex),并随机分为五组,采用不同的粘结剂策略:(G1)-单键通用型粘结剂+酸蚀+硅烷+RelyX Ultimate;(G2)-单键通用型粘结剂+硅烷+RelyX Ultimate;(G3)-单键通用型粘结剂+酸蚀+RelyX Ultimate;(G4)-单键通用型粘结剂+RelyX Ultimate;以及(G5)-Scotchbond多功能粘结剂+RelyX ARC。粘结后,标本在37°C、湿度100%的环境中储存24小时。将标本垂直于粘结界面切割以获得梁状试件,并进行微拉伸试验。微拉伸值以MPa表示,并通过单因素方差分析和多重比较Tukey检验进行分析(α=0.05)。

结果

各实验组以MPa计的平均粘结强度为:G1 = 11.48,G2 = 14.15,G3 = 16.95,G4 = 17.03,G5 = 16.80。统计分析表明,不同的粘结剂策略对粘结强度值没有显著影响。

结论

不同的粘结剂策略对牙本质与间接树脂复合材料的粘结没有显著影响。使用硅烷、与单键通用型粘结剂相关的酸蚀处理并未提高粘结强度值。粘结剂、牙科水门汀、牙本质。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review.自酸蚀粘结系统:文献综述
Braz Dent J. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):3-10. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302442.
9
A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.一种新型通用简化型黏合剂:6 个月临床评估。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Feb;25(1):55-69. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12005. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验