Ammerman Brooke A, Berman Mitchell E, McCloskey Michael S
Arch Suicide Res. 2018 Apr-Jun;22(2):193-223. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1319312. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
The majority of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) research has used self- or clinician-rated measures of behavior which (a) are subject to reporting biases, or (b) have limited use in experimental designs that could illuminate causal relationships. Laboratory-based behavioral tasks have therefore been developed to assess NSSI-related behaviors more directly. We reviewed the behavioral methods that have been developed to assess NSSI tendencies or behaviors over the past 30 years. Several categories of laboratory analogues were identified: NSSI-related stimuli (e.g., NSSI pictures, implicit association tasks, guided imagery), experimenter administered pain stimuli (e.g., cold, heat, pressure, shock, and blade), and self-selected pain stimuli (e.g., cold and shock). These behavioral methods assess various aspects of NSSI and all have distinct advantages and shortcomings. Overall, these approaches have made significant contributions to the field complementing self- and clinician-ratings.
大多数非自杀性自伤(NSSI)研究使用的是自我报告或临床医生评定的行为测量方法,这些方法要么(a)容易受到报告偏差的影响,要么(b)在能够阐明因果关系的实验设计中的用途有限。因此,基于实验室的行为任务已被开发出来,以更直接地评估与NSSI相关的行为。我们回顾了过去30年中为评估NSSI倾向或行为而开发的行为方法。确定了几类实验室模拟方法:与NSSI相关的刺激(如NSSI图片、内隐联想任务、引导式意象)、实验者施加的疼痛刺激(如冷、热、压力、电击和刀片)以及自我选择的疼痛刺激(如冷和电击)。这些行为方法评估了NSSI的各个方面,且都有明显的优缺点。总体而言,这些方法为该领域做出了重大贡献,对自我报告和临床医生评定起到了补充作用。