Liu Ning, Tian Li, Jiang Rong-Xian, Xu Chao, Shi Lei, Lei Wei, Zhang Yang
aDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University bDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an cDepartment of Orthopedics, 62th Hospital of PLA, Puer, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(16):e6720. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006720.
Odontoid process fracture accounts for 5% to 15% of all cervical spine injuries, and the rate is higher among elderly people. The anterior cannulated screw fixation has been widely used in odontoid process fracture, but the fixation strength may still be limited under some circumstances. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical fixation strength of expansive double-threaded bi-directional compression screw (EDBCS) compared with cannulated lag screw (CLS) and improved Herbert screw (IHS) for fixation of type II odontoid process fracture.Thirty fresh cadaveric C2 vertebrae specimens were harvested and randomly divided into groups A, B, and C. A type II fracture model was simulated by osteotomy. Then the specimens of the 3 groups were stabilized with a single CLS, IHS, or EDBCS, respectively. Each specimen was tested in torsion from 0° to 1.25° for 75 s in each of 5 cycles clockwise and 5 cycles anticlockwise. Shear and tensile forces were applied at the anterior-to-posterior and proximal-to-distal directions, respectively, both to a maximum load of 45 N and at a speed of 1 mm/min.The mean torsional stiffness was 0.309 N m/deg for IHS and 0.389 N m/deg for EDBCS, which were significantly greater compared with CLS, respectively (0.169 N m/deg) (P < .05 and P < .05). The mean shear stiffness for the EDBCS was 238 N/mm, which was significantly greater than CLS (150 N/mm) and IHS (132 N/mm) (P < .05 and P < .05). All 3 screws only partly restored tensile stiffness, but not significantly.Fixation with the EDBCS can improve the biomechanical strength for odontoid process fracture compared with CLS and IHS, especially in terms of torsional and shear stiffness.
齿突骨折占所有颈椎损伤的5%至15%,在老年人中的发生率更高。前路空心螺钉固定已广泛应用于齿突骨折,但在某些情况下固定强度可能仍有限。本研究旨在探讨膨胀双螺纹双向加压螺钉(EDBCS)与空心拉力螺钉(CLS)和改良Herbert螺钉(IHS)相比,用于固定Ⅱ型齿突骨折的生物力学固定强度。收集30个新鲜尸体C2椎体标本,随机分为A、B、C组。通过截骨术模拟Ⅱ型骨折模型。然后分别用单枚CLS、IHS或EDBCS固定3组标本。每个标本在0°至1.25°范围内进行扭转测试,顺时针和逆时针各5个循环,每个循环75秒。分别在前向后和近向远向方向施加剪切力和拉力,最大载荷均为45N,速度为1mm/min。IHS的平均扭转刚度为0.309N·m/°,EDBCS为0.389N·m/°,与CLS(0.169N·m/°)相比均显著更高(P<0.05和P<0.05)。EDBCS的平均剪切刚度为238N/mm,显著大于CLS(150N/mm)和IHS(132N/mm)(P<0.05和P<0.05)。所有3种螺钉仅部分恢复了拉伸刚度,但差异不显著。与CLS和IHS相比,EDBCS固定可提高齿突骨折的生物力学强度,尤其是在扭转和剪切刚度方面。