• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮肤药物不良反应中致病药物及临床实体的趋势:一项回顾性研究。

Trends in culprit drugs and clinical entities in cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Wang Fang, Zhao Yu-Kun, Li Minyi, Zhu Zhe, Zhang Xingqi

机构信息

a Department of Dermatology , First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China.

b Department of Dermatology , Eastern Hospital of First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China , and.

出版信息

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017 Dec;36(4):370-376. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1301947. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1080/15569527.2017.1301947
PMID:28423957
Abstract

PURPOSE

Morbidity due to cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) is quite common. The specific culprit drugs change over time and clinicians must be kept informed with updated knowledge, thus preventing potential CADRs. This retrospective study is a survey of CADRs encountered in a hospital-based population in Southern China during three time intervals, from 1984 to 2015.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical records were review of 306 patients with CADRs who were admitted to our hospital from 2011 to 2015. These data were compared with patients visiting our hospital during 1984-1994 and 2003-2010.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2015, the most common CADRs were exanthematous reactions (40.8%) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN; 17.0%). There were eight cases (2.6%) of CADRs related to targeted therapy in oncology. In the 205 CADR cases that were due to single medications, the most common offending drugs were allopurinol (21.5%), cephalosporins (10.7%) and carbamazepine (10.2%). The percentages of CADR cases due to allopurinol, carbamazepine, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors were significantly higher from 2011 to 2015 compared with 1984-1994 or 2003-2010. The rate of SJS/TEN occurrence was significantly higher in the two recent periods compared with 1984-1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in drug prescriptions are a major factor that affects the CADRs seen in clinical records. Newer drugs can be culpable for CADRs, and more CADRs are now documented with increased severity at clinical presentation. Reliable screening tests for specific drugs are urgently required to eliminate possible fatalities.

摘要

目的

皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)所致的发病率相当常见。具体的致病药物会随时间变化,临床医生必须了解最新知识,从而预防潜在的CADR。这项回顾性研究是对1984年至2015年期间在中国南方一家医院人群中遇到的CADR进行的调查。

材料与方法

回顾了2011年至2015年期间我院收治的306例CADR患者的临床记录。将这些数据与1984 - 1994年和2003 - 2010年期间来我院就诊的患者进行比较。

结果

2011年至2015年,最常见的CADR是皮疹反应(40.8%)和史蒂文斯 - 约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(SJS/TEN;17.0%)。有8例(2.6%)CADR与肿瘤学中的靶向治疗有关。在205例由单一药物引起的CADR病例中,最常见的致病药物是别嘌醇(21.5%)、头孢菌素(10.7%)和卡马西平(10.2%)。与1984 - 1994年或2003 - 2010年相比,2011年至2015年期间由别嘌醇、卡马西平或表皮生长因子受体抑制剂引起的CADR病例百分比显著更高。与1984 - 1994年相比,最近两个时期SJS/TEN的发生率显著更高。

结论

药物处方的变化是影响临床记录中所见CADR的主要因素。新药可能是CADR的罪魁祸首,现在有更多的CADR被记录下来,且临床表现的严重程度增加。迫切需要针对特定药物的可靠筛查试验以消除可能的死亡病例。

相似文献

1
Trends in culprit drugs and clinical entities in cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study.皮肤药物不良反应中致病药物及临床实体的趋势:一项回顾性研究。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017 Dec;36(4):370-376. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2017.1301947. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
2
An epidemiological and clinical analysis of cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.马来西亚柔佛州一家 tertiary 医院的皮肤药物不良反应的流行病学和临床分析。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012 Nov-Dec;78(6):734-9. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.102367.
3
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: an 8-year retrospective study on hospitalized patients in Southern China.皮肤药物不良反应:对中国南方住院患者的一项8年回顾性研究。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012 Jul-Aug;78(4):488-90. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.98082.
4
Research on Susceptible Genes and Immunological Pathogenesis of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Chinese Hans.中国汉族人群皮肤药物不良反应的易感基因及免疫发病机制研究
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2015 Jul;17(1):29-31. doi: 10.1038/jidsymp.2015.6.
5
Association of HLA-A*31:01 Screening With the Incidence of Carbamazepine-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in a Japanese Population.HLA-A*31:01 筛查与日本人群中卡马西平诱导的皮肤不良反应发生率的关联。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):842-849. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0278.
6
Spontaneous cutaneous adverse drug reaction reports-An analysis of a 10-year dataset in Singapore.自发性皮肤不良反应报告——新加坡 10 年数据集分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019 Mar 13;7(2):e00469. doi: 10.1002/prp2.469. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Adverse cutaneous drug reactions among hospitalized patients: five year surveillance.住院患者的药物性皮肤不良反应:五年监测
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2013 Mar;32(1):41-5. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2012.702837. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Prevalence of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Southwest China: an 11-year retrospective survey on in-patients of a dermatology ward.西南地区皮肤药物不良反应的流行情况:皮肤科病房 11 年回顾性调查。
Dermatitis. 2012 Mar-Apr;23(2):81-5. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d1aae.
9
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.马来西亚柔佛州一家三级医院观察到的药物皮肤不良反应。
Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;49(7):834-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04481.x.
10
Clinical profile of cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a retrospective study of 1883 hospitalized patients from 2007 to 2016 in Shanghai, China.中国上海 2007 年至 2016 年 1883 例住院患者皮肤不良反应的临床特征:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Feb 1;30(1):24-31. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3713.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Strategy in the Detection of Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions: A Case Series Study.检测皮肤药物不良反应的新策略:一项病例系列研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;14(6):575. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14060575.
2
Immunological Mechanisms in Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions.皮肤药物不良反应的免疫机制
Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2024 Jan 1;32(1):1-12. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2023.170.
3
NSAID Hypersensitivity in the Pediatric Population: Classification and Diagnostic Strategies.儿科人群中的非甾体抗炎药超敏反应:分类与诊断策略
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Sep 28;15:1383-1399. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S267005. eCollection 2022.
4
Clinical Profile and Comparison of Causality Assessment Tools in Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions.皮肤药物不良反应的临床概况及因果关系评估工具比较
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2019 Jan-Feb;10(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_207_18.