Schwaighofer B, Hübsch P, Kovarik J, Frühwald F, Kainberger F, Barton P
Abteilung für Diagnostische Radiologie, II. Medizinische Universitätsklinik Wien.
Rofo. 1988 Aug;149(2):193-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1048322.
A prospective study was carried out in 81 patients to compare the ability of colour coded Doppler sonography (angiodynography) and Tc bolus examination for demonstrating renal blood supply. In patients with normal transplant function both methods performed equally well. In anuric patients angiodynography was superior to the Tc bolus examination: In three cases angiodynography was able to provide important additional information such as absence of blood flow in peripheral intrarenal vessels or missing blood supply of a transplant pole. Angiodynography seems to be able to replace the Tc bolus examination; this statement excludes very obese patients until low-frequency probes for angiodynography will be available.
对81例患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,以比较彩色编码多普勒超声检查(血管动力学检查)和Tc团注检查显示肾血供的能力。在移植肾功能正常的患者中,两种方法表现相当。在无尿患者中,血管动力学检查优于Tc团注检查:在3例患者中,血管动力学检查能够提供重要的额外信息,如肾内周边血管无血流或移植肾极无血供。血管动力学检查似乎能够取代Tc团注检查;在有适用于血管动力学检查的低频探头之前,这一说法不适用于非常肥胖的患者。