Suppr超能文献

[MISSCARE调查 - 意大利语版本:一项意大利验证研究的结果]

[MISSCARE Survey - Italian Version: findings from an Italian validation study].

作者信息

Sist Luisa, Contini Carla, Bandini Anna, Bandini Stefania, Massa Licia, Zanin Roberta, Maricchio Rita, Gianesini Gloria, Bassi Erika, Tartaglini Daniela, Palese Alvisa, Ferraresi Annamaria

机构信息

Coordinatore Infermieristico PARE, Dipartimento Medico della Continuità Assistenziale e delle Disabilità, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italia.

Responsabile attività didattiche professionalizzanti, Corso di Laurea in Infermieristica, Università di Bologna, Polo Scientifico Didattico di Ravenna - sede di Faenza, Italia.

出版信息

Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2017 Jan-Feb;73(1):29-45.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Missed Nursing Care (MNC) refers to nursing interventions that are not completed, partially completed, or postponed. Despite the relevance of MNC, no assessment tools are available in the Italian context, and no data regarding the occurrence of this phenomenon has been documented on a large scale to date.

OBJECTIVES

The study aims were: (1) to validate the Italian version of the MISSCARE Survey tool; (2) to measure the prevalence of missed interventions and reasons for missed care as perceived by clinical nurses working in Italian health care settings.

METHODS

After having conducted the forward and backward translation, pre-pilot and pilot phases were developed to ensure face and content validity as well as semantic and conceptual equivalence of the Italian version with the original version. The MISSCARE survey questionnaire was then distributed to 1,233 clinical nurses of whom 1,003 completed the questionnaire. Overall, 979 questionnaires were analysed. The questionnaires were completed from January to March 2012, by nurses working in medical and surgical hospital departments in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy. Construct validity and internal consistency of the instrument were assessed.

RESULTS

The face and content validity were ascertained by a group of experts. The instrument acceptability was good given that 79.4% of respondents replied to all items. Construct validity was investigated by an Exploratory Factor Analysis. Four factors explaining 64.18% of variance emerged: communication, lack of facilities/supplies, lack of staff, and unexpected events. Internal consistency, evaluated with Cronbach a, was 0.94. The nursing interventions omitted with greater frequency were, in order: ambulation (74.8%), passive mobilization (69.6%) and oral care (51.3%). The three main reasons for missed interventions were: an unexpected increase in the number of patients (90.5%), increased instability of the clinical condition (86.1%) and insufficient human resources (85.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the MISSCARE Survey was shown to have good psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be used to evaluate the missed nursing care phenomenon in Italy and will allow for international comparisons.

摘要

背景

漏做护理(MNC)是指未完成、部分完成或推迟的护理干预措施。尽管漏做护理具有相关性,但在意大利的环境中尚无可用的评估工具,并且迄今为止尚未大规模记录有关这一现象发生情况的数据。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)验证MISSCARE调查工具的意大利语版本;(2)测量在意大利医疗保健机构工作的临床护士所感知的漏做干预措施的发生率以及漏做护理的原因。

方法

在进行了正向和反向翻译之后,开展了预试验和试验阶段,以确保意大利语版本在表面效度和内容效度以及语义和概念等效性方面与原始版本一致。然后,将MISSCARE调查问卷分发给1233名临床护士,其中1003人完成了问卷。总体而言,对979份问卷进行了分析。这些问卷于2012年1月至3月由在意大利艾米利亚 - 罗马涅地区的医疗和外科医院科室工作的护士完成。对该工具的结构效度和内部一致性进行了评估。

结果

一组专家确定了表面效度和内容效度。鉴于79.4%的受访者回答了所有项目,该工具的可接受性良好。通过探索性因素分析对结构效度进行了研究。出现了四个解释64.18%方差的因素:沟通、设施/用品不足、人员短缺和意外事件。用Cronbach α评估的内部一致性为0.94。遗漏频率较高的护理干预措施依次为:行走(74.8%)、被动活动(69.6%)和口腔护理(51.3%)。漏做干预措施的三个主要原因是:患者数量意外增加(90.5%)、临床状况稳定性增加(86.1%)和人力资源不足(85.5%)。

结论

MISSCARE调查的意大利语版本显示出良好的心理测量特性。因此,它可用于评估意大利的漏做护理现象,并将允许进行国际比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验