Suppr超能文献

MISSCARE 调查量表(儿科版)的编制与验证。

Development and validation of the MISSCARE survey - Pediatric version.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2018 Dec;74(12):2922-2934. doi: 10.1111/jan.13837. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

Abstract

AIM

Develop and test the validity and reliability of MISSCARE Survey-Ped adapted from previous versions of the MISSCARE Survey, which measures omitted nursing activities and the reasons why they were left undone. Our secondary aim was to pre-test the construct validity using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA).

BACKGROUND

Missed Nursing Care is described as "every care activity necessary for the patient that is not provided or is seriously delayed". Missed Care is correlated with negative patient outcomes, such as mortality and adverse events.

DESIGN

A mixed-mode cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Participants included registered pediatric nurses and nurses working in pediatric wards. This study was conducted between June and September 2017 and consisted of four phases: (a) analysis of existing surveys and item construction; (b) content and face validity; (c) reliability analysis (acceptability for ease of use, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and test-retest to measure stability); and (d) construct validity (EFA).

RESULTS

The MISSCARE Survey-Ped consists of two sections: Section A "Missed Nursing Care Activities" (29 items) and Section B "Reasons for Missed Nursing Care Activities" (17 items). The new survey showed good validity properties and effectively identified Missed Nursing Care activities in pediatric settings.

CONCLUSION

The development and validation of the MISSCARE Survey-Ped made it possible to conduct an objective and standardized study of missed nursing care activities in the field of pediatrics. This new survey offers the opportunity to collect data that enable to design and implement interventions that improve the quality and safety of pediatric nursing.

摘要

目的

开发并检验 MISSCARE 调查-儿科版的有效性和可靠性,该版本改编自之前的 MISSCARE 调查版本,旨在衡量遗漏的护理活动及其未完成的原因。我们的次要目的是使用探索性因子分析(EFA)对构建效度进行预测试。

背景

遗漏的护理被描述为“患者所需的每一项护理活动,如果没有提供或严重延迟提供”。遗漏的护理与患者的负面结果相关,如死亡率和不良事件。

设计

混合模式的横断面调查。

方法

参与者包括注册儿科护士和在儿科病房工作的护士。这项研究于 2017 年 6 月至 9 月进行,包括四个阶段:(a)分析现有调查和项目构建;(b)内容和表面效度;(c)可靠性分析(可接受性,易于使用,Cronbach's alpha 用于内部一致性,测试-重测用于衡量稳定性);(d)结构效度(EFA)。

结果

MISSCARE 调查-儿科版由两部分组成:A 部分“遗漏的护理活动”(29 项)和 B 部分“遗漏护理活动的原因”(17 项)。新调查显示出良好的有效性特征,并能有效识别儿科环境中的遗漏护理活动。

结论

MISSCARE 调查-儿科版的开发和验证使得在儿科领域对遗漏的护理活动进行客观和标准化的研究成为可能。这项新调查提供了收集数据的机会,使我们能够设计和实施干预措施,以提高儿科护理的质量和安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验