Benedetti Marco, Klinich Kathleen D, Manary Miriam A, Flannagan Carol A
a University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute , Ann Arbor , Michigan.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Nov 17;18(8):866-869. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1318209. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
The objective of this study was to identify factors that predict restraint use and optimal restraint use among children aged 0 to 13 years.
The data set is a national sample of police-reported crashes for years 2010-2014 in which type of child restraint is recorded. The data set was supplemented with demographic census data linked by driver ZIP code, as well as a score for the state child restraint law during the year of the crash relative to best practice recommendations for protecting child occupants. Analysis used linear regression techniques.
The main predictor of unrestrained child occupants was the presence of an unrestrained driver. Among restrained children, children had 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.27, 2.17) times higher odds of using the recommended type of restraint system if the state law at the time of the crash included requirements based on best practice recommendations.
Children are more likely to ride in the recommended type of child restraint when their state's child restraint law includes wording that follows best practice recommendations for child occupant protection. However, state child restraint law requirements do not influence when caregivers fail to use an occupant restraint for their child passengers.
本研究的目的是确定0至13岁儿童中预测约束使用情况及最佳约束使用情况的因素。
数据集是2010 - 2014年警方报告的撞车事故的全国样本,其中记录了儿童约束装置的类型。该数据集补充了按驾驶员邮政编码链接的人口普查数据,以及撞车当年州儿童约束法相对于保护儿童乘客的最佳实践建议的评分。分析采用线性回归技术。
未受约束的儿童乘客的主要预测因素是存在未受约束的驾驶员。在受约束的儿童中,如果撞车时的州法律包括基于最佳实践建议的要求,儿童使用推荐类型约束系统的几率高出1.66倍(95%置信区间,1.27,2.17)。
当州儿童约束法包含遵循儿童乘客保护最佳实践建议的措辞时,儿童更有可能乘坐推荐类型的儿童约束装置。然而,州儿童约束法的要求不会影响照顾者未为其儿童乘客使用乘客约束装置的情况。