Suppr超能文献

美国儿童安全座椅和增高座椅的使用情况:父母/照顾者报告的使用情况与观察到的使用情况估计值的比较。

Use of child safety seats and booster seats in the United States: A comparison of parent/caregiver-reported and observed use estimates.

机构信息

Division of Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Division of Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2021 Dec;79:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motor-vehicles crashes are a leading cause of death among children. Age- and size-appropriate restraint use can prevent crash injuries and deaths among children. Strategies to increase child restraint use should be informed by reliable estimates of restraint use practices.

OBJECTIVE

Compare parent/caregiver-reported and observed child restraint use estimates from the FallStyles and Estilos surveys with the National Survey of the Use of Booster Seats (NSUBS).

METHODS

Estimates of child restraint use from two online, cross-sectional surveys-FallStyles, a survey of U.S. adults, and Estilos, a survey of U.S. Hispanic adults-were compared with observed data collected in NSUBS. Parents/caregivers of children aged ≤ 12 years were asked about the child's restraint use behaviors in FallStyles and Estilos, while restraint use was observed in NSUBS. Age-appropriate restraint use was defined as rear-facing child safety seat (CSS) use for children aged 0-4 years, forward-facing CSS use for children aged 2-7 years, booster seat use for children aged 5-12 years, and seat belt use for children aged 9-12 years. Age-appropriate restraint users are described by demographic characteristics and seat row, with weighted prevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, child restraint use as reported by parents/caregivers was 90.8% (CI: 87.5-94.1) (FallStyles) and 89.4% (CI: 85.5-93.4) for observed use (NSUBS). Among Hispanic children, reported restraint use was 82.6% (CI: 73.9-91.3) (Estilos) and 84.4% (CI: 79.0-88.6) for observed use (NSUBS, Hispanic children only). For age-appropriate restraint use, estimates ranged from 74.3% (CI: 69.7-79.0) (FallStyles) to 59.7% (CI: 55.0-64.4) (NSUBS), and for Hispanic children, from 71.5% (CI: 62.1-81.0) (Estilos) to 57.2% (CI: 51.2-63.2) (NSUBS, Hispanic children only). Conclusion and Practical Application: Overall estimates of parent/caregiver-reported and observed child restraint use were similar. However, for age-appropriate restraint use, reported use was higher than observed use for most age groups.

摘要

背景

机动车事故是儿童死亡的主要原因。使用适合年龄和体型的约束装置可以预防儿童在车祸中的受伤和死亡。增加儿童约束装置使用的策略应该基于对约束装置使用情况的可靠估计。

目的

比较 FallStyles 和 Estilos 调查中的父母/照顾者报告的和观察到的儿童约束装置使用估计值与国家使用助推座椅调查(NSUBS)。

方法

比较两个在线横断面调查-FallStyles(一项针对美国成年人的调查)和 Estilos(一项针对美国西班牙裔成年人的调查)-中父母/照顾者报告的儿童约束装置使用估计值与 NSUBS 中收集的观察数据。在 FallStyles 和 Estilos 中,询问父母/照顾者关于儿童≤12 岁的儿童约束装置使用行为,而在 NSUBS 中观察约束装置使用情况。年龄适宜的约束装置使用定义为 0-4 岁儿童使用后向式儿童安全座椅(CSS),2-7 岁儿童使用前向式 CSS,5-12 岁儿童使用助推座椅,9-12 岁儿童使用安全带。按人口统计学特征和座椅排描述年龄适宜的约束装置使用者,并计算加权流行率和相应的 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

总体而言,父母/照顾者报告的儿童约束装置使用率为 90.8%(CI:87.5-94.1)(FallStyles),观察使用率为 89.4%(CI:85.5-93.4)(NSUBS)。在西班牙裔儿童中,报告的约束装置使用率为 82.6%(CI:73.9-91.3)(Estilos),观察使用率为 84.4%(CI:79.0-88.6)(仅西班牙裔儿童的 NSUBS)。对于年龄适宜的约束装置使用,估计值范围为 74.3%(CI:69.7-79.0)(FallStyles)至 59.7%(CI:55.0-64.4)(NSUBS),对于西班牙裔儿童,估计值范围为 71.5%(CI:62.1-81.0)(Estilos)至 57.2%(CI:51.2-63.2)(仅西班牙裔儿童的 NSUBS)。

结论和实际应用

父母/照顾者报告的和观察到的儿童约束装置使用的总体估计值相似。然而,对于年龄适宜的约束装置使用,大多数年龄组的报告使用率高于观察使用率。

相似文献

10

本文引用的文献

4
Predictors of restraint use among child occupants.儿童乘车时使用约束装置的预测因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Nov 17;18(8):866-869. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1318209. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
9
Child passenger safety.儿童乘客安全。
Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):788-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0213. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验