Sherwood R L, Thomas P T, Kawanishi C Y, Fenters J D
Life Sciences Research, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois 60616.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jul;54(7):1744-51. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.7.1744-1751.1988.
Pulmonary infections may be induced in experimental animals by using several exposure routes. Inhalation of microbial aerosols is often viewed as the most relevant exposure route, although the comparability of either intranasal (i.n.) or intratracheal (i.t.) inoculation to aerosol inhalation is unclear. In these studies, the infection of mice with either Streptococcus zooepidemicus or influenza virus was compared following i.n., i.t., or aerosol challenge. The 50% lethal dose was determined by each exposure route for both microbes, and the organ clearance of a 50% lethal dose was determined. Mice were as or more sensitive to bacterial or viral infection following i.n. or i.t. instillation as compared with aerosol challenge. Organ clearance patterns of virus or bacteria varied slightly with exposure route.
通过几种暴露途径可在实验动物中诱发肺部感染。吸入微生物气溶胶通常被视为最相关的暴露途径,尽管鼻内(i.n.)或气管内(i.t.)接种与气溶胶吸入的可比性尚不清楚。在这些研究中,比较了经鼻内、气管内或气溶胶攻击后,小鼠感染兽疫链球菌或流感病毒的情况。确定了两种微生物每种暴露途径的50%致死剂量,并测定了50%致死剂量的器官清除率。与气溶胶攻击相比,小鼠经鼻内或气管内滴注后对细菌或病毒感染的敏感性相同或更高。病毒或细菌的器官清除模式随暴露途径略有不同。