Erb Christopher D, Moher Jeff, Song Joo-Hyun, Sobel David M
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 296 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, United States.
Psychology Department, Williams College, 18 Hoxsey Street, Williamstown, MA 01267, United States.
Cognition. 2017 Jul;164:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.023. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
Recent studies have suggested that dissociable processes featuring distinct types of inhibition support cognitive control in tasks requiring participants to override a prepotent response with a control-demanding alternative response. An open question concerns how these processes support cognitive flexibility in rule-switching tasks. We used a technique known as reach tracking to investigate how 5- to 8-year-olds (Experiment 1) and adults (Experiment 2) select, maintain, and switch between incompatible rule sets in a computerized version of the Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS). Our results indicate that rule switching differentially impacts two key processes underlying cognitive control in children and adults. Adult performance also revealed a strong response bias not observed in children, which complicated a direct comparison of switching between the age groups and reopens questions concerning the relation between child and adult performance on the task. We discuss these findings in the context of a contemporary model of cognitive control.
最近的研究表明,具有不同类型抑制的可分离过程在要求参与者用需要控制的替代反应来克服优势反应的任务中支持认知控制。一个悬而未决的问题是,这些过程如何在规则切换任务中支持认知灵活性。我们使用一种称为伸手跟踪的技术来研究5至8岁儿童(实验1)和成年人(实验2)在计算机化的维度变化卡片分类任务(DCCS)中如何选择、维持和在不兼容的规则集之间进行切换。我们的结果表明,规则切换对儿童和成年人认知控制的两个关键过程有不同的影响。成年人的表现还显示出一种儿童未观察到的强烈反应偏差,这使得直接比较不同年龄组之间的切换变得复杂,并重新引发了关于儿童和成年人在该任务上表现之间关系的问题。我们在当代认知控制模型的背景下讨论这些发现。