Developmental Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 May;193:104809. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104809. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
The current project studied the direct, near transfer, and far transfer effects of cognitive flexibility training in two experiments with 117 3-year-olds. In both Experiments 1 and 2, children performed three Dimensional Change Card Sorting (DCCS) tasks in a pre-training/training/post-training design. The training consisted of giving corrective feedback in the training DCCS task. In Experiment 2, in addition, three other executive control tasks were administered during pre-training and post-training. Results showed a direct effect of feedback in the training DCCS task and transfer of this effect to the post-training DCCS task after 1 week with different sorting rules and different stimuli. These findings show that preschoolers learned to switch sorting rules in the context of the DCCS task, independent of the specific sorting rules, and that this effect is not transient. No support was found for transfer to the other executive control tasks. A possible explanation is that the feedback mainly improved rule switching, an ability that is specifically required for performing a cognitive flexibility task but not the other executive control tasks.
当前的项目在两个实验中研究了认知灵活性训练的直接、近迁移和远迁移效应,共有 117 名 3 岁儿童参与。在实验 1 和实验 2 中,儿童在预训练/训练/后训练设计中完成了三个三维变化卡片分类(DCCS)任务。训练包括在训练 DCCS 任务中提供纠正反馈。在实验 2 中,此外,在预训练和后训练期间还进行了另外三个执行控制任务。结果表明,在训练 DCCS 任务中提供反馈有直接影响,并且在 1 周后,在具有不同分类规则和不同刺激的情况下,这种影响会转移到后训练 DCCS 任务。这些发现表明,学龄前儿童学会了在 DCCS 任务的背景下切换分类规则,而不依赖于特定的分类规则,并且这种效果不是短暂的。没有证据表明对其他执行控制任务有转移。一种可能的解释是,反馈主要改善了规则切换,这是执行认知灵活性任务所必需的能力,而不是其他执行控制任务所必需的能力。