Malmstrøm M L, Gögenur I, Riis L B, Hassan H, Klausen T W, Perner T, Săftoiu A, Vilmann P
Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Køge, Denmark.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jun;32(6):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2820-x. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
With an increasing demand for more accurate preoperative staging methods for colon cancer, we aimed to compare preoperative tumour (T)- and nodal (N)-stage in patients with left-sided colon cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) with post-operative histology as gold standard.
A total of 44 patients were prospectively recruited at Herlev and Roskilde University Hospitals during November 2014-January 2016. Thirty-five patients were included in the final analysis and underwent EUS, CT and surgery within 2 weeks. Diagnostic values were evaluated for "low risk" (T1+T2+T3 with ≤5 mm extramural invasion) and "high risk" (T3 with >5 mm of extramural spread + T4) colonic cancer.
Sensitivity and specificity in "low risk" colonic cancer evaluated with EUS was 0.90 [0.74;0.98] and 0.75 [0.19;0.99] and with CT 0.96 [0.80;0.99] and 0.25 [<0.01;0.81]. EUS and CT were poor in predicting N0 or N+ disease.
The sensitivity of EUS and CT were good and comparable regarding T-stage evaluation, while EUS had a significantly higher specificity in the evaluation of "low risk" tumours. The results obtained for "high risk" colonic cancer were difficult to evaluate due to small patient numbers. EUS could be considered as a supplement to CT scans in selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapies, or local transmural treatment, in the future.
NCT02324023.
随着对结肠癌更精确术前分期方法的需求不断增加,我们旨在以术后组织学为金标准,比较内镜超声检查(EUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)对左侧结肠癌患者术前肿瘤(T)分期和淋巴结(N)分期的情况。
2014年11月至2016年1月期间,在赫勒夫和罗斯基勒大学医院前瞻性招募了44例患者。最终分析纳入了35例患者,这些患者在2周内接受了EUS、CT和手术。对“低风险”(T1+T2+T3且壁外侵犯≤5mm)和“高风险”(T3且壁外扩散>5mm+T4)结肠癌的诊断价值进行了评估。
用EUS评估“低风险”结肠癌时的敏感性和特异性分别为0.90[0.74;0.98]和0.75[0.19;0.99],用CT评估时分别为0.96[0.80;0.99]和0.25[<0.01;0.81]。EUS和CT在预测N0或N+疾病方面表现不佳。
在T分期评估方面,EUS和CT的敏感性良好且相当,而EUS在评估“低风险”肿瘤时特异性显著更高。由于患者数量少,“高风险”结肠癌的结果难以评估。未来,在选择新辅助治疗或局部透壁治疗的患者时,EUS可被视为CT扫描的补充。
NCT02324023。