Aimaurai Sirinya, Jumpated Atthapinya, Krass Ines, Dhippayom Teerapon
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Apr 10;11:751-760. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S132054. eCollection 2017.
Current evidence supports the benefit of medicine-use review (MUR) for the safe and effective use of medicines. However, little is known about opinions of consumers regarding their preference for undertaking MUR, especially in the developing world, eg, in some Asian countries. We aimed to explore patients' opinions about potential MUR and other enhanced services provided by community pharmacists.
A qualitative study using focus groups was conducted at Naresuan University's community pharmacy, Phitsanulok, Thailand. MUR-naïve patients were recruited from two pharmacies in Phitsanulok. All focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.
Twenty participants attended four focus groups. The following themes were identified: 1) requirement and need for the service, 2) accessibility and convenience of receiving the service, 3) pharmacist attributes needed in delivering the service, and 4) how to promote the use of MUR successfully. The majority of participants had poor understanding about their medicines and were interested in receiving a MUR service. Regarding accessibility, convenience and close proximity of pharmacies to homes were deemed to be supportive of participants to use the service. However, several potential barriers to uptake were identified: perceived difficulty on the part of recipients in making time to receive the service and the inconvenience of having to provide medicines/records of medicines to pharmacists. The following domains of pharmacists' characteristics were viewed as supportive determinants: personality (friendliness and confidence in giving information) and attitude (willingness to provide the service and not commercially oriented). The participants suggested that promoting the services using a mix of strategies would increase an awareness of MUR service.
Recognizing the unmet needs of patients for information on their medicines provides a good opportunity for community pharmacists to offer an MUR service to ensure quality use of medicines in the community.
目前的证据支持用药回顾(MUR)对安全有效用药的益处。然而,对于消费者对进行用药回顾的偏好看法,我们知之甚少,尤其是在发展中世界,例如一些亚洲国家。我们旨在探讨患者对社区药剂师提供的潜在用药回顾及其他强化服务的看法。
在泰国彭世洛府那黎宣大学的社区药房进行了一项采用焦点小组的定性研究。从彭世洛府的两家药房招募了从未接受过用药回顾的患者。所有焦点小组均进行了录音、转录并进行主题分析。
20名参与者参加了4个焦点小组。确定了以下主题:1)服务的需求,2)接受服务的可及性和便利性,3)提供服务所需的药剂师特质,4)如何成功推广用药回顾的使用。大多数参与者对自己的药物了解不足,并且有兴趣接受用药回顾服务。关于可及性,药房离家近被认为有助于参与者使用该服务。然而,也发现了一些潜在的使用障碍:接受者认为难以抽出时间接受服务,以及必须向药剂师提供药品/用药记录带来的不便。药剂师的以下特质领域被视为支持性决定因素:个性(友好且对提供信息有信心)和态度(愿意提供服务且不以商业为导向)。参与者建议采用多种策略推广服务将提高对用药回顾服务的认识。
认识到患者对药物信息的未满足需求为社区药剂师提供了一个提供用药回顾服务的好机会,以确保社区内药物的合理使用。