• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary versus secondary acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients.危重症患者原发性与继发性急性胃肠损伤的临床特征及预后比较
J Intensive Care. 2017 Apr 20;5:26. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0221-4. eCollection 2017.
2
Association between acute gastrointestinal injury and biomarkers of intestinal barrier function in critically ill patients.危重症患者急性胃肠损伤与肠屏障功能生物标志物之间的关联
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 29;17(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0603-z.
3
Association between nutrition support and acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients during the first 72 hours.营养支持与重症患者前 72 小时内急性胃肠损伤的关系。
Clin Nutr. 2021 Jan;40(1):217-221. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Association between acute gastrointestinal injury grading system and disease severity and prognosis in critically ill patients: A multicenter, prospective, observational study in China.急性胃肠损伤分级系统与危重症患者疾病严重程度及预后的关系:一项在中国进行的多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 10.
5
Prognostic Value of Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Combined with Disease Severity Scores in Critically Ill Patients.急性胃肠损伤联合疾病严重程度评分在危重症患者中的预后价值
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun;28(6):575-580. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24733.
6
Severity of acute gastrointestinal injury grade is a predictor of all-cause mortality in critically ill patients: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.严重程度急性胃肠损伤分级是危重症患者全因死亡率的预测因子:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Jul 14;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1780-4.
7
[Establishment of comprehensive prediction model of acute gastrointestinal injury classification of critically ill patients].[危重症患者急性胃肠损伤分级综合预测模型的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):325-330.
8
Association between Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Score (GIDS) and disease severity and prognosis in critically ill patients: A prospective, observational study.危重症患者胃肠功能障碍评分(GIDS)与疾病严重程度和预后的相关性:一项前瞻性、观察性研究。
Clin Nutr. 2023 May;42(5):700-705. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2023.03.004. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Evaluation of clinical application of ESICM acute gastrointestinal injury grading system: a single-center observational study.ESICM急性胃肠损伤分级系统的临床应用评估:一项单中心观察性研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(10):1833-6.
10
[Predictive value of SOFA score combined AGI grading system in elderly patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis with 91 patients].序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分联合急性胃肠损伤(AGI)分级系统对老年脓毒症患者的预测价值:一项纳入91例患者的回顾性分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):145-149. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between nutritional status, daily nutrition delivery and clinical outcomes of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a protocol for Isfahan multicentre prospective observational cohort ICU study (the Isfahan-ICU study).重症监护病房成年重症患者营养状况、每日营养供给与临床结局之间的关联:伊斯法罕多中心前瞻性观察队列ICU研究方案(伊斯法罕-ICU研究)
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e090825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090825.
2
Research progress on digestive disorders following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后消化系统紊乱的研究进展
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1524495. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1524495. eCollection 2024.
3
Core outcome set of daily monitoring of gastrointestinal function in adult critically ill patients: a modified Delphi consensus process (COSMOGI).成年危重症患者胃肠道功能每日监测的核心结局集:一项改良德尔菲共识制定过程(COSMOGI)
Crit Care. 2024 Dec 18;28(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05192-8.
4
Comparing gastrointestinal dysfunction score and acute gastrointestinal injury grade for predicting short-term mortality in critically ill patients.比较胃肠道功能障碍评分和急性胃肠损伤分级对预测危重症患者短期死亡率的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 14;30(42):4523-4531. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i42.4523.
5
Abdominal physical examinations in early stages benefit critically ill patients without primary gastrointestinal diseases: a retrospective cohort study.早期腹部体格检查对无原发性胃肠道疾病的危重症患者有益:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 9;11:1338061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1338061. eCollection 2024.
6
Acute gastrointestinal injury and altered gut microbiota are related to sepsis-induced cholestasis in patients with intra-abdominal infection: a retrospective and prospective observational study.急性胃肠损伤和肠道微生物群改变与腹腔内感染患者的脓毒症诱导的胆汁淤积有关:一项回顾性和前瞻性观察性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 27;10:1144786. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1144786. eCollection 2023.
7
The Serum Citrulline and D-Lactate are Associated with Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Failure in Critically Ill Patients.血清瓜氨酸和D-乳酸与危重症患者的胃肠功能障碍及衰竭相关。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Aug 3;14:4125-4134. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S305209. eCollection 2021.
8
Early Onset of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcome in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.术后胃肠道功能障碍早期发作与心脏手术不良预后相关:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):1264-1271. doi: 10.1177/0885066620946006. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Heparin-binding protein as a biomarker of gastrointestinal dysfunction in critically ill patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study in China.肝素结合蛋白作为危重症患者胃肠功能障碍的生物标志物:中国的一项回顾性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e036396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036396.
10
Serum ammonia levels on admission for predicting sepsis patient mortality at D28 in the emergency department: A 2-center retrospective study.急诊科入院时血清氨水平对预测脓毒症患者第28天死亡率的影响:一项双中心回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(11):e19477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019477.

本文引用的文献

1
Glycocalyx and sepsis-induced alterations in vascular permeability.糖萼与脓毒症诱导的血管通透性改变
Crit Care. 2015 Jan 28;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0741-z.
2
Gastrointestinal complications after ischemic stroke.缺血性中风后的胃肠道并发症。
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Nov 15;346(1-2):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
3
Enterocyte damage in critically ill patients is associated with shock condition and 28-day mortality.危重症患者的肠上皮细胞损伤与休克状态和 28 天死亡率相关。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2169-76. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828c26b5.
4
Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems.重症监护患者的胃肠功能:术语、定义和管理。ESICM 腹部问题工作组的建议。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Mar;38(3):384-94. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2459-y. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
5
Endothelial glycocalyx dysfunction in disease: albuminuria and increased microvascular permeability.疾病中的内皮糖萼功能障碍:白蛋白尿和微血管通透性增加。
J Pathol. 2012 Mar;226(4):562-74. doi: 10.1002/path.3964.
6
Gastrointestinal symptoms in intensive care patients.重症监护患者的胃肠道症状
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Mar;53(3):318-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01860.x.
7
Gastrointestinal failure score in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.危重症患者的胃肠功能衰竭评分:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(4):R90. doi: 10.1186/cc6958. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
8
Intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎患者的腹腔内高压
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R452-7. doi: 10.1186/cc3754. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
9
The importance of the gastrointestinal system in the pathogenesis of heart failure.胃肠道系统在心力衰竭发病机制中的重要性。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Nov;26(22):2368-74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi389. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
10
Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure.原发性和继发性腹腔间隔室综合征均可被早期预测,且是多器官功能衰竭的先兆。
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):848-59; discussion 859-61. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000070166.29649.F3.

危重症患者原发性与继发性急性胃肠损伤的临床特征及预后比较

Comparison of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary versus secondary acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Zhang Dong, Fu Rao, Li Yanhua, Li Hongyan, Li Yuting, Li Hongxiang

机构信息

ICU, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2017 Apr 20;5:26. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0221-4. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40560-017-0221-4
PMID:28435684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5397695/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This prospective study compared clinical characteristics and prognosis between primary (P) and secondary (S) acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) (P-AGI)/(S-AGI) in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-center observational study. Patients were included if they had been hospitalized for at least 72 h before the AGI diagnosis. Patients were classified according to severity of gastrointestinal dysfunction, while P-AGI or S-AGI were defined according to whether the gastrointestinal system was directly or indirectly involved. Clinical characteristics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores after inclusion and 28-day mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

Altogether, 282 patients were included: P and S groups enrolled 100 and 182 patients, respectively. The S group patients were older and showed increased morbidities and higher APACHE II and SOFA scores. Compared to the S group, the P group had a higher prevalence in abdominal distention and enteroparalysis and fewer patients at AGI grade I, while more patients at grade III or IV. The S group patients had the higher 28-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed AGI grades, APACHE II score, and S-AGI independently predicted the odds of 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing to the P-AGI patients, the S group patients were older, with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores. AGI grade, APACHE II score, and S-AGI independently predicted the odds of 28-day mortality in AGI patients.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性研究比较了危重症患者原发性(P)和继发性(S)急性胃肠损伤(AGI)(P-AGI)/(S-AGI)的临床特征和预后。

方法

这是一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究。纳入在AGI诊断前已住院至少72小时的患者。根据胃肠功能障碍的严重程度对患者进行分类,而P-AGI或S-AGI根据胃肠系统是直接还是间接受累来定义。记录纳入后的临床特征、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分、脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以及28天死亡率。

结果

共纳入282例患者:P组和S组分别纳入100例和182例患者。S组患者年龄更大,发病率更高,APACHE II和SOFA评分更高。与S组相比,P组腹胀和肠麻痹的患病率更高,AGI I级患者更少,而III级或IV级患者更多。S组患者的28天死亡率更高。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,AGI分级、APACHE II评分和S-AGI独立预测28天死亡率的几率。

结论

与P-AGI患者相比,S组患者年龄更大,APACHE II和SOFA评分更高。AGI分级、APACHE II评分和S-AGI独立预测AGI患者28天死亡率的几率。