Zhang Dong, Fu Rao, Li Yanhua, Li Hongyan, Li Yuting, Li Hongxiang
ICU, The First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, China.
J Intensive Care. 2017 Apr 20;5:26. doi: 10.1186/s40560-017-0221-4. eCollection 2017.
This prospective study compared clinical characteristics and prognosis between primary (P) and secondary (S) acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) (P-AGI)/(S-AGI) in critically ill patients.
This was a prospective, single-center observational study. Patients were included if they had been hospitalized for at least 72 h before the AGI diagnosis. Patients were classified according to severity of gastrointestinal dysfunction, while P-AGI or S-AGI were defined according to whether the gastrointestinal system was directly or indirectly involved. Clinical characteristics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores after inclusion and 28-day mortality were recorded.
Altogether, 282 patients were included: P and S groups enrolled 100 and 182 patients, respectively. The S group patients were older and showed increased morbidities and higher APACHE II and SOFA scores. Compared to the S group, the P group had a higher prevalence in abdominal distention and enteroparalysis and fewer patients at AGI grade I, while more patients at grade III or IV. The S group patients had the higher 28-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed AGI grades, APACHE II score, and S-AGI independently predicted the odds of 28-day mortality.
Comparing to the P-AGI patients, the S group patients were older, with higher APACHE II and SOFA scores. AGI grade, APACHE II score, and S-AGI independently predicted the odds of 28-day mortality in AGI patients.
本前瞻性研究比较了危重症患者原发性(P)和继发性(S)急性胃肠损伤(AGI)(P-AGI)/(S-AGI)的临床特征和预后。
这是一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究。纳入在AGI诊断前已住院至少72小时的患者。根据胃肠功能障碍的严重程度对患者进行分类,而P-AGI或S-AGI根据胃肠系统是直接还是间接受累来定义。记录纳入后的临床特征、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分、脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以及28天死亡率。
共纳入282例患者:P组和S组分别纳入100例和182例患者。S组患者年龄更大,发病率更高,APACHE II和SOFA评分更高。与S组相比,P组腹胀和肠麻痹的患病率更高,AGI I级患者更少,而III级或IV级患者更多。S组患者的28天死亡率更高。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,AGI分级、APACHE II评分和S-AGI独立预测28天死亡率的几率。
与P-AGI患者相比,S组患者年龄更大,APACHE II和SOFA评分更高。AGI分级、APACHE II评分和S-AGI独立预测AGI患者28天死亡率的几率。