a Department of Psychology , University of Georgia.
J Pers Assess. 2018 May-Jun;100(3):259-267. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is one of the most popular measures of narcissism. However, its use of a forced-choice response set might negatively affect some of its psychometric properties. The purpose of this research was to compare a Likert version of the NPI, in which only the narcissistic response of each pair was given, to the original NPI, in 3 samples of participants (N = 1,109). To this end, we compared the nomological networks of the forced-choice and Likert formats of the NPI in relation to alternative measures of narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, entitlement, self-esteem, general personality traits (reported by self and informants), interpersonal styles, and general pathological traits included in the DSM-5. The Likert format NPI-total and subscales-manifested similar construct validity to the original forced-choice format across all criteria with only minor differences that seem to be due mainly to the increased reliability and variability found in the Likert NPI Entitlement/Exploitativeness subscale. These results provide evidence that a version of the NPI that employs a Likert format can justifiably be used in place of the original.
自恋人格量表(NPI)是最受欢迎的自恋测量工具之一。然而,它使用强制选择反应集可能会对其某些心理测量特性产生负面影响。本研究的目的是在 3 组参与者样本(N=1109)中,将 NPI 的李克特版本(其中只给出了每对的自恋反应)与原始 NPI 进行比较。为此,我们比较了 NPI 强制选择和李克特格式的效标网络,与替代性的自恋、自恋型人格障碍、权利感、自尊、一般人格特质(自我报告和知情人报告)、人际风格以及 DSM-5 中包含的一般病理性特质的衡量标准。李克特格式的 NPI 总分和分量表——在所有标准上与原始的强制选择格式表现出相似的结构有效性,只有一些微小的差异,这些差异似乎主要归因于李克特 NPI 权利感/剥削性分量表中发现的可靠性和可变性的增加。这些结果为使用李克特格式的 NPI 版本可以替代原始版本提供了证据。