Suppr超能文献

《大五人格问卷中的强迫选择和李克特格式与自恋人格之间的关联性比较》

A Comparison of the Nomological Networks Associated With Forced-Choice and Likert Formats of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Georgia.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2018 May-Jun;100(3):259-267. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

Abstract

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is one of the most popular measures of narcissism. However, its use of a forced-choice response set might negatively affect some of its psychometric properties. The purpose of this research was to compare a Likert version of the NPI, in which only the narcissistic response of each pair was given, to the original NPI, in 3 samples of participants (N = 1,109). To this end, we compared the nomological networks of the forced-choice and Likert formats of the NPI in relation to alternative measures of narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, entitlement, self-esteem, general personality traits (reported by self and informants), interpersonal styles, and general pathological traits included in the DSM-5. The Likert format NPI-total and subscales-manifested similar construct validity to the original forced-choice format across all criteria with only minor differences that seem to be due mainly to the increased reliability and variability found in the Likert NPI Entitlement/Exploitativeness subscale. These results provide evidence that a version of the NPI that employs a Likert format can justifiably be used in place of the original.

摘要

自恋人格量表(NPI)是最受欢迎的自恋测量工具之一。然而,它使用强制选择反应集可能会对其某些心理测量特性产生负面影响。本研究的目的是在 3 组参与者样本(N=1109)中,将 NPI 的李克特版本(其中只给出了每对的自恋反应)与原始 NPI 进行比较。为此,我们比较了 NPI 强制选择和李克特格式的效标网络,与替代性的自恋、自恋型人格障碍、权利感、自尊、一般人格特质(自我报告和知情人报告)、人际风格以及 DSM-5 中包含的一般病理性特质的衡量标准。李克特格式的 NPI 总分和分量表——在所有标准上与原始的强制选择格式表现出相似的结构有效性,只有一些微小的差异,这些差异似乎主要归因于李克特 NPI 权利感/剥削性分量表中发现的可靠性和可变性的增加。这些结果为使用李克特格式的 NPI 版本可以替代原始版本提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验