• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《大五人格问卷中的强迫选择和李克特格式与自恋人格之间的关联性比较》

A Comparison of the Nomological Networks Associated With Forced-Choice and Likert Formats of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Georgia.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2018 May-Jun;100(3):259-267. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731
PMID:28436690
Abstract

The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is one of the most popular measures of narcissism. However, its use of a forced-choice response set might negatively affect some of its psychometric properties. The purpose of this research was to compare a Likert version of the NPI, in which only the narcissistic response of each pair was given, to the original NPI, in 3 samples of participants (N = 1,109). To this end, we compared the nomological networks of the forced-choice and Likert formats of the NPI in relation to alternative measures of narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, entitlement, self-esteem, general personality traits (reported by self and informants), interpersonal styles, and general pathological traits included in the DSM-5. The Likert format NPI-total and subscales-manifested similar construct validity to the original forced-choice format across all criteria with only minor differences that seem to be due mainly to the increased reliability and variability found in the Likert NPI Entitlement/Exploitativeness subscale. These results provide evidence that a version of the NPI that employs a Likert format can justifiably be used in place of the original.

摘要

自恋人格量表（NPI）是最受欢迎的自恋测量工具之一。然而，它使用强制选择反应集可能会对其某些心理测量特性产生负面影响。本研究的目的是在 3 组参与者样本（N=1109）中，将 NPI 的李克特版本（其中只给出了每对的自恋反应）与原始 NPI 进行比较。为此，我们比较了 NPI 强制选择和李克特格式的效标网络，与替代性的自恋、自恋型人格障碍、权利感、自尊、一般人格特质（自我报告和知情人报告）、人际风格以及 DSM-5 中包含的一般病理性特质的衡量标准。李克特格式的 NPI 总分和分量表——在所有标准上与原始的强制选择格式表现出相似的结构有效性，只有一些微小的差异，这些差异似乎主要归因于李克特 NPI 权利感/剥削性分量表中发现的可靠性和可变性的增加。这些结果为使用李克特格式的 NPI 版本可以替代原始版本提供了证据。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the Nomological Networks Associated With Forced-Choice and Likert Formats of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.《大五人格问卷中的强迫选择和李克特格式与自恋人格之间的关联性比较》
J Pers Assess. 2018 May-Jun;100(3):259-267. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1310731. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: the narcissistic personality inventory-13 and the narcissistic personality inventory-16.两种简短的夸大性自恋测量方法的测试：自恋人格问卷-13和自恋人格问卷-16。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1120-36. doi: 10.1037/a0033192. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
Five-Factor Model Best Describes Narcissistic Personality Inventory Across Different Item Response Formats.五因素模型最能描述不同项目反应格式下的自恋人格问卷。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Oct;122(5):1946-1966. doi: 10.1177/0033294118794404. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
The Structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory With Binary and Rating Scale Items.具有二分法和评定量表项目的自恋人格问卷的结构
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(6):626-37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1039015. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
A Comparison of Unidimensionality and Measurement Precision of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire.自恋人格量表与自恋钦佩与竞争量表的一维性和测量精度比较。
Assessment. 2019 Mar;26(2):281-293. doi: 10.1177/1073191116686686. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
How to Identify Narcissism With 13 Items? Validation of the German Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 (G-NPI-13).如何用 13 项指标识别自恋？德国自恋人格量表 13 项（G-NPI-13）的验证。
Assessment. 2019 Jun;26(4):630-644. doi: 10.1177/1073191117740625. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
The Effect of Response Format on the Psychometric Properties of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Consequences for Item Meaning and Factor Structure.反应格式对自恋人格问卷心理测量特性的影响：对项目意义和因素结构的影响
Assessment. 2016 Apr;23(2):203-20. doi: 10.1177/1073191114568113. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity.自恋人格问卷的主成分分析及其结构效度的进一步证据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):890-902. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.890.
9
The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: a useful tool for assessing pathological narcissism? Evidence from patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.自恋型人格障碍量表：评估病理性自恋的有用工具？来自自恋型人格障碍患者的证据。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(3):301-8. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.732636. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
10
Is the Narcissistic Personality Inventory still relevant? A test of independent grandiosity and entitlement scales in the assessment of narcissism.自恋人格量表是否仍然适用？独立的浮夸和权利量表在自恋评估中的检验。
Assessment. 2012 Mar;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/1073191111429390. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting self at stake by telling a story: Storyteller's narcissistic traits modulate physiological emotional reactions to recipient's disengagement.讲述故事时自我冒险：故事讲述者的自恋特质调节对接收者脱离的生理情绪反应。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0302703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302703. eCollection 2024.
2
Altruism and the Dark Triad.利他主义与黑暗三性格
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;10(3):234-239. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2022.113436. eCollection 2022.
3
Examining the Therapeutic Effect of Ceremonial Ayahuasca on Narcissistic Personality and Antagonistic Externalizing in Adults.
审视仪式用致幻剂 Ayahuasca 对成人自恋型人格和敌对外化的治疗效果。
J Pers Disord. 2023 Apr;37(2):131-155. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.131.
4
Momentarily narcissistic? Development of a short, state version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory applicable in momentary assessment.瞬间自恋？编制适用于瞬间评估的病理性自恋量表的简短状态版本。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:992271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992271. eCollection 2022.
5
Grandiosity, vulnerability, and narcissistic fluctuation: Examining reliability, measurement invariance, and construct validity of four brief narcissism measures.夸大、脆弱与自恋波动：检验四种简短自恋量表的信度、测量不变性和结构效度。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:993663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993663. eCollection 2022.
6
Narcissistic Traits and Executive Functions.自恋特质与执行功能
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 1;12:707887. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707887. eCollection 2021.
7
The anxious addictive narcissist: The relationship between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, anxiety symptoms and Facebook Addiction.焦虑型成瘾自恋者：浮夸型和脆弱型自恋、焦虑症状与 Facebook 成瘾之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241632. eCollection 2020.
8
Narcissism and self-esteem: A nomological network analysis.自恋与自尊：一种规范网络分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0201088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201088. eCollection 2018.
9
Narcissistic Leaders and Their Victims: Followers Low on Self-Esteem and Low on Core Self-Evaluations Suffer Most.自恋型领导者及其受害者：自尊水平低且核心自我评价低的追随者受害最深。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 29;9:422. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00422. eCollection 2018.