Dinić Bojana M, Vujić Aleksandar
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Psychol Rep. 2019 Oct;122(5):1946-1966. doi: 10.1177/0033294118794404. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
The objective of this research was to validate the Narcissistic Personality Inventory across different response formats, given that several factor structures were proposed, ranging from two to seven factors. The original forced-choice format of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory was given to 410 participants and a modified, i.e., Likert format was given to 423 participants from the general population, along with personality and other narcissism measures. The results showed that the five-factor model proposed by Ackerman et al. had the best model fit in both response formats and that a distinction between adaptive (Leadership, Vanity, and Superiority) and some aspects of maladaptive (Manipulativeness and Exhibitionism) narcissism factors could be established. However, the redundancy of items in certain factors could be problematic and further improvements of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory should include more indicators of some proposed factors, especially of Vanity.
鉴于提出了从两个因素到七个因素的几种因素结构，本研究的目的是在不同的反应格式下验证自恋人格量表。将自恋人格量表的原始迫选格式施测于410名参与者，并将修改后的格式（即李克特格式）施测于423名来自普通人群的参与者，同时施测人格和其他自恋测量工具。结果表明，阿克曼等人提出的五因素模型在两种反应格式中都具有最佳的模型拟合度，并且可以在适应性自恋因素（领导力、虚荣和优越感）和适应不良自恋因素（操纵性和自我表现欲）的某些方面之间建立区分。然而，某些因素中项目的冗余可能会有问题，自恋人格量表的进一步改进应包括更多一些提出的因素的指标，尤其是虚荣的指标。
