• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 2%利多卡因、4%阿替卡因和 0.5%布比卡因在下颌神经阻滞麻醉对症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果的前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。

Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.

出版信息

J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31(2):124-128. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1642.

DOI:10.11607/ofph.1642
PMID:28437508
Abstract

AIMS

To compare the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine on producing inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

METHODS

A total of 91 adult patients who were actively experiencing mandibular molar pain were involved in this study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups on the basis of the anesthetic solution used. The first group received IANB with 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, the second group received IANB with 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and the third group received IANB with 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine. After 15 minutes of IANB, conventional endodontic access preparation was started. The pain during the treatment was noted on a Heft-Parker visual analog scale (HP VAS). The primary outcome measure was anesthetic success, and anesthesia was considered successful if the patient reported no pain or weak/mild pain (HP VAS score < 55 mm) during endodontic treatment (pulp access and canal preparation procedures). The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The anesthetic success rates of 2% lidocaine, 4% articaine, and 0.5% bupivacaine were 23%, 33%, and 17%, respectively. The differences were statistically insignificant (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The 2% lidocaine solution used for IANB had similar success rates when compared with 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine.

摘要

目的

比较 1.8 毫升 2%利多卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素、4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素和 0.5%布比卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素在患有症状性不可复性牙髓炎的患者中产生下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)的麻醉效果。

方法

本研究共纳入 91 名主动经历下颌磨牙疼痛的成年患者。根据所用麻醉剂溶液将患者随机分为三组。第一组接受 1.8 毫升 2%利多卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素的 IANB,第二组接受 4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素的 IANB,第三组接受 0.5%布比卡因加 1:200000 肾上腺素的 IANB。IANB 后 15 分钟开始常规根管预备。治疗过程中的疼痛采用 Heft-Parker 视觉模拟量表(HP VAS)记录。主要结局指标为麻醉成功率,如果患者在根管治疗(牙髓进入和根管预备过程)期间报告无疼痛或弱/轻度疼痛(HP VAS 评分<55mm),则认为麻醉成功。采用单因素方差分析和卡方检验进行数据分析。

结果

2%利多卡因、4%阿替卡因和 0.5%布比卡因的麻醉成功率分别为 23%、33%和 17%。差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

与 4%阿替卡因和 0.5%布比卡因相比,2%利多卡因溶液用于 IANB 的成功率相似。

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of 2% Lidocaine, 4% Articaine, and 0.5% Bupivacaine on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.比较 2%利多卡因、4%阿替卡因和 0.5%布比卡因在下颌神经阻滞麻醉对症状性不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果的前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31(2):124-128. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1642.
2
Comparison of Preoperative Oral Ketorolac on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal and Lingual Infiltration with Articaine and Lidocaine in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study.术前口服酮咯酸对不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞及阿替卡因和利多卡因颊舌浸润麻醉效果的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照双盲研究
J Endod. 2015 Nov;41(11):1773-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.四卡因在下颌神经阻滞和颊侧浸润技术用于不可复性牙髓炎患者牙髓麻醉的麻醉效果:一项前瞻性随机双盲临床试验。
J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.009.
4
Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.在治疗不可复性牙髓炎的患牙中,使用阿替卡因行阻滞麻醉和浸润麻醉的效果对比:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
5
Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.在下颌磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎中,阿替卡因与利多卡因作为补充颊侧浸润麻醉剂的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.022. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
6
Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后,补充颊侧和舌侧注射阿替卡因和利多卡因对不可逆性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.012.
7
A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.一项在下颌牙齿不可逆性牙髓炎患者下颌神经阻滞失败后,不同辅助局部麻醉技术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
8
Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study.阿替卡因与利多卡因作为下牙槽神经阻滞失败后的补充内淋巴管注射的疗效:一项随机双盲研究。
J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Effect of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized double-blind study.碳酸氢钠缓冲利多卡因对有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患牙下牙槽神经阻滞成功率的影响:一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究。
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):33-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
Anaesthetic efficacy of supplemental lingual infiltration of mandibular molars after inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.下颌磨牙在下颌神经阻滞加颊侧浸润麻醉后补充舌侧浸润麻醉对不可复性牙髓炎患者的麻醉效果。
Int Endod J. 2013 Jul;46(7):660-5. doi: 10.1111/iej.12042. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the interaction of local anesthetic agents with sequential and continuous chelation in root dentin - An study.评估局部麻醉剂与根管牙本质中顺序性和连续性螯合作用的相互作用——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Aug;28(8):821-825. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_371_25. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Cryotherapy as a supplementary aid to inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial.冷冻疗法作为有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞的辅助手段:一项随机对照试验。
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Jul 22;5(5):55. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.254. eCollection 2025 Sep-Oct.
3
Influence of Premedication and Dental Anxiety on Anesthetic Efficacy in Patients Undergoing Root Canal for Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis in Upper and Lower Molars: A Comparative Study of Articaine and Bupivacaine.
术前用药和牙科焦虑对上下颌磨牙有症状不可逆性牙髓炎患者根管治疗麻醉效果的影响:阿替卡因与布比卡因的对比研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;13(5):199. doi: 10.3390/dj13050199.
4
Comparative evaluation of the influence of the palatal root length on the efficacy of maxillary buccal infiltration by open and closed mouth technique: a randomized control trial.腭根长度对张口和闭口技术上颌颊侧浸润麻醉效果影响的比较评估:一项随机对照试验
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec;24(6):407-414. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.6.407. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
5
A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023 reveals research hotspots and trends in the connection between sport and regenerative medicine.一项 2013 年至 2023 年的文献计量分析揭示了运动与再生医学之间关联的研究热点和趋势。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 5;103(27):e38846. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038846.
6
Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study.阿替卡因与利多卡因在双侧同时拔除正畸上颌前磨牙中的疗效比较:一项半口对照研究
Cureus. 2023 Dec 6;15(12):e50078. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50078. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Comparison of Efficacy of Lidocaine and Articaine as Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocking Agents in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较利多卡因和阿替卡因作为有症状不可复性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉剂的疗效:随机对照试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 16;59(10):1840. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101840.
8
Do NSAIDs used prior to standard inferior alveolar nerve blocks improve the analgesia of mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis? An umbrella review.NSAIDs 在标准下牙槽神经阻滞之前使用是否能提高不可逆性牙髓炎下颌磨牙的镇痛效果?伞状评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):1885-1897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04979-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
9
Efficacy of 4% articaine 2% lidocaine in mandibular and maxillary block and infiltration anaesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.4%阿替卡因与2%利多卡因在下颌和上颌阻滞及浸润麻醉中对不可逆性牙髓炎患者的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2021 Sep 24;9:e12214. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12214. eCollection 2021.
10
Effectiveness of different anesthetic methods for mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同麻醉方法对有症状不可复性牙髓炎下颌后牙的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6477-6500. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04145-7. Epub 2021 Aug 28.